Free Consultation
$0 first 30 minutes
also known as North Tampa Legal Group, P.A., Chris E. Ragano, Esq.
Mr. Ragano currently serves on the Board of Directors for the North Tampa Bar Association. He is also a member of the Florida Bar (Family Law Section) and the Hillsborough County Bar Association (Family Law Section). He is a past Chair for the Family Law Section (Hillsborough County Bar Association) and gas served on the Executive Counsel Committee. He is also the former chair on the Executive Committee for the Family Law Inns of Court. He has also served on The Florida Bar Grievance Committee.
Mr. Ragano is a frequent speaker and lecturer on advanced family law litigation. He has previously lectured for The Florida Bar, National Business Institute, North Tampa Bar Association, Hillsborough County Bar Association (Family Law Section) and Bay Area Legal Services.
5
Practice Areas
31 years
31 years
31 years
Free Consultation
$0 first 30 minutes
$ 200-400 per hour
Always
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: Florida
Acquired: 1997
Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2022
14041-A North Dale Mabry Highway, Unit N-6, Tampa, FL, 33618-2406
26 Client Reviews
Showing 1 - 5 of 8 reviews | General Knowledge
Posted by anonymous | March 22, 2020 | Hired Attorney | Divorce & Separation
Very knowledgeable concerning military divorce
Chris and his team were very well versed in the divorce process as it pertained to military retirement and equitable distribution. His legal advice was critical to making sound decisions for my future post-divorce.
Posted by anonymous | July 31, 2019 | Hired Attorney | Family
Professional & Excellent Litigation Skills
I retained Mr. Ragano in order to relocate with my 2 minor children out of Florida and he delivered beyond my expectations! My fiancé had heard about Mr. Ragano based on his great reputation as a litigator and he delivered on that reputation. After six long years of high conflict with my ex-husband a...
Posted by Felicia | January 18, 2019 | Hired Attorney
Knowledgeable, prompt, and friendly
Mr. Ragano is an excellent lawyer and I’ve had the absolute best experience with him and his law office. He, and everyone at the law firm, is very prompt, friendly, and extremely knowledgeable. He is, by far, the best attorney that I have ever had in my experience and worth every penny.
Posted by Allison | October 10, 2017 | Hired Attorney | Appeals
Appellate Attorney
Chris is a brilliant and caring trial attorney. As an appellate attorney, I have handled several appeals for Chris, both as the appellant and the appellee, and I have seen the magnificent work he has done for his clients. Because of Chris' dedication to details and his knowlege of the law, I have bee...
Posted by anonymous | October 05, 2017 | Hired Attorney | Divorce & Separation
DO NOT HIRE
Mr. Ragano failed to advocate for my family as he allowed opposing counsel to dictate the course of our highly contested divorce primarily involving (documented) parental alienation and child custody. He did not demonstrate any ability or interest to battle very capable opposing counsel who was qui...
This is your second attempt to slander this firm with inaccurate information. It is unfortunate that when clients of the Law Firm of Chris E. Ragano do not achieve the results they want that they distort the facts of representation and how the case was handled because they have to blame someone instead of accepting responsibility themselves. The blame is usually directed towards the attorney or law firm, because to accept any responsibility for the outcome of their own case would haunt them for the rest of their lives. I, and the staff I employ, are staunch advocates for the rights and the best interests of our clients and what we consider to be their most precious assets, their children. In this case, the client second guessed advice that was given by conferring with other individuals who were employed in the legal profession (not as attorneys but as support staff with little legal experience) but who do not have the 20+ years' experience that I have handling complex and highly contested marital and family law cases. Anyone who reads this review would recognize that it was written not because I or my firm did not do the best job possible but, in spite of our hard work things did not go her way. First and foremost it is my responsibility to listen to what the client is saying, and then discuss from an objective and unemotional stand point the strengths and weaknesses of their case and what I believe we can actually achieve. Marital and family law cases are highly emotionally charged cases where clients only see their own perspective and not the overall picture. After I remove the emotions from the case, I then strategize with the client to present the evidence to the Court so that an informed decision can be made by the Judge. In essence, we can only take the facts as they exist and we have to wade through conjecture, emotions, and sometimes opinions of friends and relatives who are adding fuel to the clients' fire. Those opinions are not based on law or precedent. I will never distort or misrepresent the truth to the Court just to achieve the results that a client wants. In reality to do so I am doing my client a disservice, not to mention the fact that I would never destroy my credibility as an officer of the Court. As to the reviewer's comments regarding my appearance or lack of preparedness, anyone who has worked with me in the past twenty years' would tell you those comments are truly baseless and really just another attempt by the reviewer to attack my professionalism. I am known throughout the legal community as a litigator who works tirelessly for my clients and I pride myself on being over prepared to represent my clients and achieve the best possible outcome for them and their children based on the true facts of a case, and not an emotional distortion presented by the client. Other attorneys practicing marital and family law do not hesitate to refer cases which are complex or become contested to my office because they have confidence in my abilities as a litigator. The Court makes the final determination on cases, and takes into considerations all evidence presented, including the mental health or any apparent mental deficits presented by the client during the course of the pending case. It is clear that based on the presentation that the client made, the Judge did waht it felt was in the best interests of the children, not what the mother wanteFinally with regard to the issue of a bar grievance, first the reviewed is incorrect that any reprimand by the bar stays on an attorney's grievance history for 10 years. It does not simply "disappear". The Florida Bar did investigate this matter and based upon the same facts presented in this review, with documentation from my office substantiating the work performed, the Florida Bar closed its investigation with a finding of no probable cause. If you check my bar profile under grievance history you will plainly see that it says "none"
"I have known Chris for well over 20 years through litigation against him. He was always zealous and compelling. Of late I have been assigned on several of his cases as a Guardian ad Litem. In those cases I had the opportunity to observe him in court as a bystander. Chris is always respectful of the court, forceful when needed, and cognizant of what the court needed to hear. I admire Chris because too many attorneys lose sight of the children I represent. Chris has always heard me out and then addressed his clients when needed...all for the best interests of the children. When Chris and I litigated, even though he was zealous about his clients, he and I always managed to settle our differences and we came to peaceful resolutions that ultimately were in our clients' best interests. Chris has the knowledge to walk that line between litigation and settlement."
"I have known Chris for many years and have had cases with him on the other side. He is a great attorney to work with even if you cannot agree. He is extremely professional and ethical."
"It is a pleasure to have Chris as a colleague. You should consider Chris if you are searching for a results oriented attorney."
"It is my pleasure to e endorse Chris on Avvo. Chris is professional. He combines an excellent form of client education with his approach to the law."
"I gladly endorse Chris. He is professional and knowledgable. Chris posses and unparalleled passion for his work and clients."
"Chris is an excellent attorney. Chris shows his knowledge, in his work and the relationships he has with his clients."
Family lawyer
Family lawyer
Family lawyer
Family lawyer
Personal injury lawyer
This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2022.
Disbarment issued in FL, 2022
updated on 06/30/2023This is the most serious penalty for a lawyer. If this attorney is currently practicing law, you should contact the Florida Bar to understand the reasons for this disbarment.
Suspension with Conditions issued in FL, 2022
updated on 06/30/2022This means an attorney lost his or her license to practice law for a period of time. The attorney typically returns to practicing law when the suspension expires.
2017
AV, Martindale-Hubbell
2006 - Present
President, North Tampa Legal Group, P.A.
2000 - Present
Florida Bar, Family Law Section, Domestic Violence CommitteeMember
2008 - 2009
Family Law American Inn of Court of TampaFormer Executive Committee Chair
2007 - 2008
Florida Bar, Thirteenth Circuit Professionalism CommitteeFormer Chair
2006 - 2007
Florida Bar, Thirteenth Circuit Grievance CommitteeFormer Chair
2005 - 2006
Hillsborough County Bar Association, Family Law SectionFormer Chair
2005 - 2006
Hillsborough County Bar Association, Family Law SectionFormer Chair
Denied Husband Alimony and his request for Credits/Setoffs.
Court granted Former Wife supervised Time Sharing and Ultimate Decision Making.
Court denied Husband alimony and awarded our client, the Wife, an "unequal" distribution of the assets in her favor due to his misconduct and waste of marital assets. Court also awarded attorney's fees.
Mother's Petition for Paternity and Child Support (Past and Prospective) Granted
Court ruled that Husband could have unsupervised, overnight time-sharing in the United States during Spring Break, Christmas Break and Long Weekends. Court also allowed Husband to have unsupervised Summer time sharing in Austria.
Court granted his request to modify his monthly alimony payment and denied former wife's request to increase it.
Court denied wife her relocation request and ordered "equal" time sharing for the husband.
Court vacated post-nuptial agreement based on extreme emotional distress.
Court denied former wife's request under Rule 1.540.
Court ordered unsupervised contact and "equal" time sharing.
N/A
law
2016
2014
Family Law A-Z
2012
Getting Started: Initial Interview, Pleadings, and Hearings.
2010
Trends in a Changing Environment – “Domestic Violence
2010
2009
How the Revised Statute 61.13 Effects Child Support
2009
Establishment, Delinquency, and Enforcement of Income Deduction Orders
2009
Domestic Violence Update
2008
The 3 D's - Untangling Dependency, Domestic Violence, and Divorce
2006
Prosecuting the Respondent in Domestic Violence Cases: A Petitioner's Perspective
2005
Domestic Violence : An Informative Guide To The Family Law Practitioner
2004
The Bad and The Ugly - An Informative Guide to Defending and Prosecuting Domestic Violence Injunctions
2003
Prosecuting and Defending Domestic Violence Injunctions
2010
2010
2010
2010
2008
English
Spanish
Legal Answers
Legal Guides
GAL responsibilities? When one parent is proving the other parent lies and isn’t caring for child’s health
02 Jun 2020
Can my children’s decision change custody ?
25 May 2020
What can I do about my daughter mom not living with her ?
21 May 2020