Mark J. O'Brien

PRO

Mark J. O'Brien

4.9
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 27 years

Federal crime Lawyer at Tampa, FL
Practice Areas: Federal Crime, White Collar Crime, Criminal Defense ... +2 more

511 W Bay St., Suite 330, Tampa, FL

Virtual Consultation Available

Free Consultation

About Mark

Biography

Federal Criminal Trouble? State Criminal Trouble? Former Federal Prosecutor and State Prosecutors and a Defense Team of Retired Federal Agents. Speak to an Attorney Now. 24/7/365. Discreet, Fast, and Free Consultation.

You Only Get One Chance for a Second Chance! Appeal Now! Federal Criminal Appeals. State Criminal Appeals. Former Federal Prosecutor and State Prosecutors and a Defense Team of Retired Federal Agents. Speak to an Attorney Now. 24/7/365. Discreet, Fast, and Free Consultation.

Federal Criminal Trouble? State Criminal Trouble? Former Federal Prosecutor and State Prosecutors and a Defense Team of Retired Federal Agents. Speak to an Attorney Now. 24/7/365. Discreet, Fast, and Free Consultation.

Federal Criminal Trouble? Former Federal Prosecutor and Miami Prosecutor and a Defense Team of Retired Federal Agents. Speak to an Attorney Now. 24/7/365. Discreet, Fast, and Free Consultation.

Sex Crime Trouble? CP Crime Trouble? Federal Criminal Trouble? State Criminal Trouble? Former Federal Prosecutor and State Prosecutors and a Defense Team of Retired Federal Agents. Speak to an Attorney Now. 24/7/365. Discreet, Fast, and Free Consultation.

Federal White Collar Criminal Trouble? State White Collar Criminal Trouble? Former Federal Prosecutor and State Prosecutors and a Defense Team of Retired Federal Agents. Speak to an Attorney Now. 24/7/365. Discreet, Fast, and Free Consultation.

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Federal Crime 40%

Tax Fraud, Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud, Bank Fraud, Mortgage Fraud Securities Fraud, Medicare Fraud, Health Care Fraud, Bribery, IRS Issues, Identity Theft Embezzlement, Insider Trading, Ponzi Schemes, Money Laundering, Sarbanes Oxley Conspiracy to Commit

28 years | 1,000 cases

40%
White Collar Crime 25%

Tax Fraud, Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud, Bank Fraud, Mortgage Fraud Securities Fraud, Medicare Fraud, Health Care Fraud, Bribery, IRS Issues, Identity Theft Embezzlement, Insider Trading, Ponzi Schemes, Money Laundering, Sarbanes Oxley Conspiracy to Commit

28 years | 1,000 cases

25%
Criminal Defense 15%

My law firm defends criminal cases throughout Florida. Drug Crimes, Gun Crimes, Conspiracy Crimes, and General Federal and State Criminal Defense

28 years | 1,000 cases

15%
Sex Crime 15%

Child Pornography Possession, Child Pornography Production, Child Pornography Transportation, Child Pornography Distribution, Child Pornography Receipt, Sex Trafficking Offenses, Conspiracy to Commit a Federal Sex Crime

28 years | 1,000 cases

15%
Appeals 5%

My law firm handles state and federal criminal appeals and post-conviction motions.

28 years | 1,000 cases

5%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 60 minutes

Retainer

Always


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Licenses

Licensed in Montana for 2 years

State: Montana

Acquired: 2023

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Florida for 27 years

State: Florida

Acquired: 1998

Member in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Massachusetts for 27 years

State: Massachusetts

Acquired: 1998

Active

No misconduct found

Location

O'Brien Hatfield, PA

511 W Bay St., Suite 330, Tampa, FL, 33606

markjobrien.com/lp/avvo/

O'Brien Hatfield, PA

121 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1500, Orlando, FL, 32801

markjobrien.com/lp/avvo/

O'Brien Hatfield, PA

1001 Brickell Bay Dri ve, 2700 M-1, Miami, FL, 33131

markjobrien.com/lp/avvo/

Mark J. O'Brien's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.9 /5.0

57 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (57) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 6 - 10 of 10 reviews | Practice Area Knowledge

Posted by anonymous | June 06, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense

Effective Title IX Expertise

We are professionals from the Northeast whose son has been attending a college in Florida. This spring, we found ourselves swept up in a crisis any parent would dread: our son was falsely accused of sexual assault. We first hired a perfectly competent local criminal lawyer who, we learned, was not ...familiar with Title IX process. We soon realized that we needed a lawyer experienced in BOTH criminal law AND Title IX to defend our son against this horrible accusation. We received a professional referral to Mark O’ Brien by a Title IX lawyer in the NE. During our first telephone conversation, we were immediately assured of Mark’s commitment, skill, and knowledge of the details of the complex, mercurial, and idiosyncratic Title IX process. Mark and his investigator, Gerry Rivera, immediately leapt into action. They gathered information from us and from our son, secured our son’s safety, assured that he would receive due process, attended to our needs as anxious parents, and kept us regularly updated about developments in the case. Mark and Gerry helped our understandably traumatized son feel more secure that he had a strong and experienced legal team behind him. Most importantly, Mark and Gerry both handled the Title IX investigators with professional courtesy and informed, appropriately authoritative toughness. This legal team’s balance of finesse and power shifted the process, so we felt confident that we had hired professionals who could protect our son through this harrowing process. Importantly, Mark and Jerry helped all three of us feel confident enough that our son could get on with his life and school and we could get on with our lives and work. Best of all: justice was served! Our son was exonerated within 3 weeks of Mark taking his case. We are therefore delighted to strongly endorse Mark’s practice.

Posted by Edwin | October 07, 2015 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense

A highly skilled and caring defense attorney.

Mark O'Brien and his law firm took my case earlier this year. I have to say it has been a great experience in what was a very bad situation I had put myself in. Not only is Attorney Mark highly skilled but genuinely cares for the well being of his cleints. His firm worked with me on my budget towards... paying him, which I am extremenly greatful for. The predicament I had put myself in could of cost me years away from my family and much hardhsips. Mark and his firm were patient and communicated well through my case which he managed to find me a very favorful outcome. Bottomline is Mark and his firm are genuinely good people who are highly skilled in thier practice. Without a doubt it was a great decision to have him as my attorney. Edwin. V

Posted by Nathan | January 14, 2015 | Criminal Defense

The Best Criminal Defense Attorney

Should you ever need a smart,caring, and highly skilled criminal defense attorney Mark O' Brien and associates are who you want fighting in your corner and no one else. Mr. O' Brien was there to help me understand and prepare for every step in the legal process. I always felt he was giving my case th...e attention it needed and deserved. I wasn't seen as a paycheck but as an individual needing good legal counsel. His case results thoroughly prove this. Thanks Mark O' Brien!

Posted by David | January 12, 2015

You will no be disappointed, hire Mark!

Better than expected results. I found that Mark J. O'Brien is very professional, caring, easy to communicate with, explains the situation and the various options extremely well. Superior knowledge of the legal aspects of the situation I had to deal with for my daughter. We were very happy wit...h the results and I don't think any other law firm could have done a better job! You should definitely hire or at least consult with Mark.

Posted by Joseph | February 06, 2020 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense

Attorney Mark J O’Brien Botched Proffer Session

February 2014 I retained attorney Mark J O’Brien for a preindictment investigation. I believe attorney O’Brien used coercion trickery promises and deceit when he intentionally knowingly hoodwinked me into an interview with the government. Attorney O’Brien lied to me, he told me AUSA Jay Hoffer gave m...e immunity he wanted to meet w/me for a proffer session, he secured a proffer agreement and that my statements are protected by the federal rule of evidence 410 criminal procedure 11f not admissible at trail, he told me to speak freely tell my side of the story without fear my statements will be used against me at trail, tell the truth there will be no charges filed. Approx one year after the interview I learned from the government that the interview wasn't a proffer session but a voluntary interview, O’Brien never secured a proffer agreement therefore my statements weren’t protected by the federal rule evidence 410 criminal procedure 11f which means my statements are admissible at trail. I don’t believe this was. A mistake I believe this was intentionally done there is no explanation for O’Briens actions. I believe based on evidence and facts that O’Brien concocted a scheme in order to get me into interview with the AUSA and FBI so they could manufacture evidence to cut off my chances of winning at trial. Before the interview O’Brien did not request the proffer agreement, he did not take contemporaneous notes, record the interview, read, adopt or sign the FBI 302 form. Agent Higgins went unchecked free to write whatever he wanted. AUSA Jay Hoffer used the manufactured confession during the entire trail, FBI Higgins testified four times and he used it four times in his closing arguments. The government hung hat a tainted confession. They produced no evidence I had knowledge of the fraud. The government star witness Brendan Bolger (who received 8 months for $50,000,000.00 bank fraud yup you read that correctly) testified “he never disclosed the fraud to me” “we never had that conversation”. Not one witness testified that I had knowledge of the fraud at the time the loans were made, not even the mortgage broker. The only evidence the government was able to produce that I had knowledge of the fraud was the manufactured confession from the April 2014 interview. Attoreny O’Brien stated on the record in his 2018 Response Affidavit 2255 that the AUSA Jay Hoffer authorized the April 2014 proffer session and he authorized him to move forward without securing the proffer agreement. AUSA Jay Hoffer responded to O’Brien Affidavit stating that he never authorized O’Brien the April 2014 interview was a proffer session, the April 2014 interview was voluntary interview therefore the government could use the statements from the April 2014 interview. O’Brien gave the government, involuntary interview which led to a manufacture confession which led to a false witness (FBI Higgins) which all led to my conviction. Because of O’Briens ineffectiveness, malfeasance and gross negligence I was convicted of a crime I had no knowledge of nor was I a willing participant. I truly believe based off of O’Briens actions or lack of attorney O’Brien curried favored with AUSA Jay Hoffer and intentionally knowingly set me up. O’Brien and the government made it appear as if I confessed incriminated myself, when in actuality it was O’Brien who convicted me. There is no other explanation for O’Briens actions why he did what he did. Attorney O’Brien doesn’t know the difference between a voluntary interview v. proffer session and he doesn’t know how to conduct a proffer session. O’Brien stated that “it’s his practice not to secure proffer agreements because he doesn’t like to take away his clients rights”, well that’s exactly what he did to me, he took away my right to a fair trail. Do not put your life in this mans hands, he is a wreck less rogue attorney, he didn’t have my best interest at heart. This is my personal experience in dealing with attorney O’Brien.

See All Client Reviews

Mark J. O'Brien's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Mark
Bjorn Erik Brunvand headshot
Bjorn Brunvand

Federal crime lawyer | Jan 17

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"It is without hesitation that I endorse Mark J. O'Brien. I would trust him to zealously represent family and friends. We have handled many cases together over the years and I have the utmost respect for him and his team."

Eric Gerard headshot
Eric Gerard

Criminal defense lawyer | Jan 16

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I've had the privilege of trying cases against Mark when I was a federal prosecutor and later working alongside him in private practice, and I can confidently say that he's one of the finest defense lawyers anywhere in the country. Mark defends his clients with equal parts passion and pragmatism, holding the government's feet to the fire at every turn while remaining vigilant of opportunities to resolve his clients' situations on the most favorable terms. When the only option is trial, his clients know they are going into battle with a fierce advocate of exceptional courtroom talent (and the track record to prove it). If a friend or loved one were ever in a jam, Mark would be my first call -- he's that good."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2025

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2024

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2023

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2022

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2021

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2020

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2019

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2018

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2017

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2016

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2013

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers

2012

Top 40 Under 40, The National Trial Lawyers

Work Experience

1998 - 2001

Prosecutor, Miami Dade State Attorney's Office Felony Division

1996 - 1997

Judicial Law Clerk, Delaware County Court

Associations

2012 - Present

National Trial Lawyers Association

2004 - Present

Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

2004 - Present

Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers

2003 - Present

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

1999 - Present

American Bar Association

Sample of Legal Cases

USA v. BLANGO - CASE NO.: 2:07-CR-39-FTM-34 (Fort Myers)

Two Not Guilty Verdicts of Armed Bank Robbery and Two Not Guilty Verdicts as to Using and Possessing a Firearm During a Crime of Violence.

USA v. SPOONER - CASE NO.: 8:11-CR-69-JDW-AEP (Tampa)

Not Guilty Verdict as to Conspiracy to Distribute 50 Grams of More of Methamphetamine (Mandatory Life), Not Guilty Verdict as to 5 Grams or More of Methamphetamine (Mandatory 20 Years), guilty as to less than 5 grams (no minimum mandatory).

USA v. JERLOW - CASE NO.: 8:08-CR-00340-VMC-EAJ (Tampa)

Motion to Suppress Evidence Granted. The original charges were dropped.

USA v. CRUZ-ALVAREZ - CASE NO.: 5:08-CR-22-OC-10-GRJ (Ocala)

Verdict of Not Guilty.

USA v. LEWIS - CASE NO.: 8:08-CR-127-RAL-26-MAP (Tampa)

Hung Jury

USA v. SMITH - CASE NO.: 6:04-CR-37-ORL-19-JGG (Orlando)

Not Guilty Verdict as to Conspiracy to Distribute 50 Kilograms of Cocaine and Not Guilty Verdict as to Conspiracy to Possess $850,000 in Counterfeit Money, guilty as to possession of marijuana.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1998

Delaware Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1995

Siena College

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2015

Intensive Trial Advocacy Program

Criminal Trial Advocacy

Publications

2012

Aspatore, 2012 Strategies For Defending Identity Theft Cases"

Languages

Spanish

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution