Mark J. O'Brien

PRO

Mark J. O'Brien

4.9
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 27 years

Federal crime Lawyer at Tampa, FL
Practice Areas: Federal Crime, White Collar Crime, Criminal Defense ... +2 more

511 W Bay St., Suite 330, Tampa, FL

Virtual Consultation Available

Free Consultation

About Mark

Biography

Federal Criminal Trouble? State Criminal Trouble? Former Federal Prosecutor and State Prosecutors and a Defense Team of Retired Federal Agents. Speak to an Attorney Now. 24/7/365. Discreet, Fast, and Free Consultation.

You Only Get One Chance for a Second Chance! Appeal Now! Federal Criminal Appeals. State Criminal Appeals. Former Federal Prosecutor and State Prosecutors and a Defense Team of Retired Federal Agents. Speak to an Attorney Now. 24/7/365. Discreet, Fast, and Free Consultation.

Federal Criminal Trouble? State Criminal Trouble? Former Federal Prosecutor and State Prosecutors and a Defense Team of Retired Federal Agents. Speak to an Attorney Now. 24/7/365. Discreet, Fast, and Free Consultation.

Federal Criminal Trouble? Former Federal Prosecutor and Miami Prosecutor and a Defense Team of Retired Federal Agents. Speak to an Attorney Now. 24/7/365. Discreet, Fast, and Free Consultation.

Sex Crime Trouble? CP Crime Trouble? Federal Criminal Trouble? State Criminal Trouble? Former Federal Prosecutor and State Prosecutors and a Defense Team of Retired Federal Agents. Speak to an Attorney Now. 24/7/365. Discreet, Fast, and Free Consultation.

Federal White Collar Criminal Trouble? State White Collar Criminal Trouble? Former Federal Prosecutor and State Prosecutors and a Defense Team of Retired Federal Agents. Speak to an Attorney Now. 24/7/365. Discreet, Fast, and Free Consultation.

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Federal Crime 40%

Tax Fraud, Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud, Bank Fraud, Mortgage Fraud Securities Fraud, Medicare Fraud, Health Care Fraud, Bribery, IRS Issues, Identity Theft Embezzlement, Insider Trading, Ponzi Schemes, Money Laundering, Sarbanes Oxley Conspiracy to Commit

28 years | 1,000 cases

40%
White Collar Crime 25%

Tax Fraud, Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud, Bank Fraud, Mortgage Fraud Securities Fraud, Medicare Fraud, Health Care Fraud, Bribery, IRS Issues, Identity Theft Embezzlement, Insider Trading, Ponzi Schemes, Money Laundering, Sarbanes Oxley Conspiracy to Commit

28 years | 1,000 cases

25%
Criminal Defense 15%

My law firm defends criminal cases throughout Florida. Drug Crimes, Gun Crimes, Conspiracy Crimes, and General Federal and State Criminal Defense

28 years | 1,000 cases

15%
Sex Crime 15%

Child Pornography Possession, Child Pornography Production, Child Pornography Transportation, Child Pornography Distribution, Child Pornography Receipt, Sex Trafficking Offenses, Conspiracy to Commit a Federal Sex Crime

28 years | 1,000 cases

15%
Appeals 5%

My law firm handles state and federal criminal appeals and post-conviction motions.

28 years | 1,000 cases

5%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 60 minutes

Retainer

Always


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Licenses

Licensed in Montana for 2 years

State: Montana

Acquired: 2023

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Florida for 27 years

State: Florida

Acquired: 1998

Member in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Massachusetts for 27 years

State: Massachusetts

Acquired: 1998

Active

No misconduct found

Location

O'Brien Hatfield, PA

511 W Bay St., Suite 330, Tampa, FL, 33606

markjobrien.com/lp/avvo/

O'Brien Hatfield, PA

121 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1500, Orlando, FL, 32801

markjobrien.com/lp/avvo/

O'Brien Hatfield, PA

1001 Brickell Bay Dri ve, 2700 M-1, Miami, FL, 33131

markjobrien.com/lp/avvo/

Mark J. O'Brien's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.9 /5.0

57 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (57) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews | Appeals

Posted by anonymous | March 27, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Appeals

The Best Federal Defense Lawyer in America

When I needed the best defense possible, Mark O’Brien and his firm were there every step of the way. My case was huge, and the odds were stacked against me, but Mark’s unmatched skill, experience, and determination made all the difference. He fought relentlessly, ensuring I was treated fairly, and ev...en personally met with the warden to get me out of solitary confinement. That’s the kind of dedication you can’t buy. Mark is highly respected, highly rated, and highly awarded—and he deserves every bit of it. He was always available to answer my questions, keeping me informed and confident throughout the process. His entire office is top-tier, handling everything with professionalism and care. Most importantly, he won my case. I never went to prison, and he’s still fighting to get my record cleared completely on appeal. If you need a federal defense attorney who will protect you, fight for you, and get results, Mark O’Brien is the one you want in your corner. There is no one better.

Posted by Joseph | December 15, 2023 | Hired Attorney | Appeals

Amazing representation

Mark J O’Brien is certainly a man of his word. He was my court appointed attorney back in 2009. I came to him with a significant criminal history, a case I was guilty of, and really no chance at getting leniency. My guidelines were 262 to 327 months. In the end, I was sentenced to 300 months, not...hing this firm could have done differently at that time. Mark did tell me at that time if I ever made it back into court, contact him, and he would represent me. After 11 years, I finally got an appeal granted. I contacted Mark, he said we will represent you going forward. Which they did and when resentenced I received 168 months, with Credit for time served. I had one year left to complete that sentence. Mark again told me when you get out, you will have three years supervision. He stated again when you file your motion to get early term on your probation get a hold of me. Of course, after 18 months on my supervision I contacted Mark’s office. He told me as long as my probation officer approves it , he will file the motion for me. my probation officer said after I complete two years himself , and his supervisor would support such motion. Marks office was diligent in preparing the paperwork. Then finally once the probation officer approved it. Marks office, then filed the motion. after a few days in front of the judge it was granted. So when I say Mark is a man of his word I know this through through for over 14 years now. I would highly recommend anyone that wants a legal team that actually cares to hire the best.

Posted by Joseph | February 06, 2020 | Hired Attorney | Appeals

Attorney Mark J O’Brien Botched Proffer Session

February 2014 I retained attorney Mark J O’Brien for a preindictment investigation. I believe attorney O’Brien used coercion trickery promises and deceit when he intentionally knowingly hoodwinked me into an interview with the government. Attorney O’Brien lied to me, he told me AUSA Jay Hoffer gave m...e immunity he wanted to meet w/me for a proffer session, he secured a proffer agreement and that my statements are protected by the federal rule of evidence 410 criminal procedure 11f not admissible at trail, he told me to speak freely tell my side of the story without fear my statements will be used against me at trail, tell the truth there will be no charges filed. Approx one year after the interview I learned from the government that the interview wasn't a proffer session but a voluntary interview, O’Brien never secured a proffer agreement therefore my statements weren’t protected by the federal rule evidence 410 criminal procedure 11f which means my statements are admissible at trail. I don’t believe this was. A mistake I believe this was intentionally done there is no explanation for O’Briens actions. I believe based on evidence and facts that O’Brien concocted a scheme in order to get me into interview with the AUSA and FBI so they could manufacture evidence to cut off my chances of winning at trial. Before the interview O’Brien did not request the proffer agreement, he did not take contemporaneous notes, record the interview, read, adopt or sign the FBI 302 form. Agent Higgins went unchecked free to write whatever he wanted. AUSA Jay Hoffer used the manufactured confession during the entire trail, FBI Higgins testified four times and he used it four times in his closing arguments. The government hung hat a tainted confession. They produced no evidence I had knowledge of the fraud. The government star witness Brendan Bolger (who received 8 months for $50,000,000.00 bank fraud yup you read that correctly) testified “he never disclosed the fraud to me” “we never had that conversation”. Not one witness testified that I had knowledge of the fraud at the time the loans were made, not even the mortgage broker. The only evidence the government was able to produce that I had knowledge of the fraud was the manufactured confession from the April 2014 interview. Attoreny O’Brien stated on the record in his 2018 Response Affidavit 2255 that the AUSA Jay Hoffer authorized the April 2014 proffer session and he authorized him to move forward without securing the proffer agreement. AUSA Jay Hoffer responded to O’Brien Affidavit stating that he never authorized O’Brien the April 2014 interview was a proffer session, the April 2014 interview was voluntary interview therefore the government could use the statements from the April 2014 interview. O’Brien gave the government, involuntary interview which led to a manufacture confession which led to a false witness (FBI Higgins) which all led to my conviction. Because of O’Briens ineffectiveness, malfeasance and gross negligence I was convicted of a crime I had no knowledge of nor was I a willing participant. I truly believe based off of O’Briens actions or lack of attorney O’Brien curried favored with AUSA Jay Hoffer and intentionally knowingly set me up. O’Brien and the government made it appear as if I confessed incriminated myself, when in actuality it was O’Brien who convicted me. There is no other explanation for O’Briens actions why he did what he did. Attorney O’Brien doesn’t know the difference between a voluntary interview v. proffer session and he doesn’t know how to conduct a proffer session. O’Brien stated that “it’s his practice not to secure proffer agreements because he doesn’t like to take away his clients rights”, well that’s exactly what he did to me, he took away my right to a fair trail. Do not put your life in this mans hands, he is a wreck less rogue attorney, he didn’t have my best interest at heart. This is my personal experience in dealing with attorney O’Brien.

See All Client Reviews

Mark J. O'Brien's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Mark
Bjorn Erik Brunvand headshot
Bjorn Brunvand

Federal crime lawyer | Jan 17

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"It is without hesitation that I endorse Mark J. O'Brien. I would trust him to zealously represent family and friends. We have handled many cases together over the years and I have the utmost respect for him and his team."

Eric Gerard headshot
Eric Gerard

Criminal defense lawyer | Jan 16

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I've had the privilege of trying cases against Mark when I was a federal prosecutor and later working alongside him in private practice, and I can confidently say that he's one of the finest defense lawyers anywhere in the country. Mark defends his clients with equal parts passion and pragmatism, holding the government's feet to the fire at every turn while remaining vigilant of opportunities to resolve his clients' situations on the most favorable terms. When the only option is trial, his clients know they are going into battle with a fierce advocate of exceptional courtroom talent (and the track record to prove it). If a friend or loved one were ever in a jam, Mark would be my first call -- he's that good."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2025

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2024

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2023

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2022

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2021

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2020

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2019

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2018

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2017

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2016

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2013

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers

2012

Top 40 Under 40, The National Trial Lawyers

Work Experience

1998 - 2001

Prosecutor, Miami Dade State Attorney's Office Felony Division

1996 - 1997

Judicial Law Clerk, Delaware County Court

Associations

2012 - Present

National Trial Lawyers Association

2004 - Present

Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

2004 - Present

Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers

2003 - Present

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

1999 - Present

American Bar Association

Sample of Legal Cases

USA v. BLANGO - CASE NO.: 2:07-CR-39-FTM-34 (Fort Myers)

Two Not Guilty Verdicts of Armed Bank Robbery and Two Not Guilty Verdicts as to Using and Possessing a Firearm During a Crime of Violence.

USA v. SPOONER - CASE NO.: 8:11-CR-69-JDW-AEP (Tampa)

Not Guilty Verdict as to Conspiracy to Distribute 50 Grams of More of Methamphetamine (Mandatory Life), Not Guilty Verdict as to 5 Grams or More of Methamphetamine (Mandatory 20 Years), guilty as to less than 5 grams (no minimum mandatory).

USA v. JERLOW - CASE NO.: 8:08-CR-00340-VMC-EAJ (Tampa)

Motion to Suppress Evidence Granted. The original charges were dropped.

USA v. CRUZ-ALVAREZ - CASE NO.: 5:08-CR-22-OC-10-GRJ (Ocala)

Verdict of Not Guilty.

USA v. LEWIS - CASE NO.: 8:08-CR-127-RAL-26-MAP (Tampa)

Hung Jury

USA v. SMITH - CASE NO.: 6:04-CR-37-ORL-19-JGG (Orlando)

Not Guilty Verdict as to Conspiracy to Distribute 50 Kilograms of Cocaine and Not Guilty Verdict as to Conspiracy to Possess $850,000 in Counterfeit Money, guilty as to possession of marijuana.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1998

Delaware Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1995

Siena College

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2015

Intensive Trial Advocacy Program

Criminal Trial Advocacy

Publications

2012

Aspatore, 2012 Strategies For Defending Identity Theft Cases"

Languages

Spanish

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution