Justin Taylor Pikramenos

Justin Taylor Pikramenos

2.4
Rating: 5.7

Licensed for 17 years

Bankruptcy and debt Lawyer at Tampa, FL
Practice Areas: Bankruptcy & Debt, Estate Planning, Tax, Family

406 N. Morgan St, Tampa, FL

About Justin

Biography

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Florida for 17 years

State: Florida

Acquired: 2008

Member in Good Standing

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2019

Location

The Pikramenos Law Group, PLLC

406 N. Morgan St, Tampa, FL, 33602

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Justin Taylor Pikramenos's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

2.4 /5.0

13 Client Reviews

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | Punctuality

Posted by anonymous | February 10, 2014 | Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

Not Recommended as a Bankruptcy Lawyer

Mr Pikramenos was hired to provide legal help with a bankruptcy case chapter 13. During this time he was either late to hearings or failed to show. His paperwork to the court was incomplete and often lost. This required him to continually ask for documents previously provided. I would call a week... or so before the hearings and ask if he needed anything else. His reply was always everything is fine. When the hearings came the court would ask again for missing paperwork. After a final warning from the court that they were going to dismiss my case and sue me for abusing the process did he finally complete the paperwork. The next phase was the confirmation hearing. Again, I was assured all would be fine and the agreed plan would go thru. Well needless to say it did not go thru as presumed. The trustee modified the plan. I guess Mr Pikramenos did not get the memo and inform me of the new plan. There is other work that still needs to be done and he fails to return phone calls or emails. I was reading a previous review which Mr. Pikramenos states that his office returns phone and email request within 24 hours. I think in my case it is closer to 24 weeks from my first of numerous calls/emails and still counting. If you choose to hire Mr Pikramenos, good luck to you. I think you will need it. In summary: Quick to collect money, poor record keeping , poor submitting required paperwork in timely manner, poor follow through, poor communication. Just poor work in general. The ole saying goes.... Hiring an attorney is either the best decision or worst decision made. I without a doubt think it was the later.

Justin Pikramenos

Replied last February 10, 2014

I am not sure who this client is, but as any attorney knows a chapter 13 undergoes a series of confirmation hearings and the trustee seeks changes and updated information along the way. Many times the attorneys and the trustees speak before the confirmation hearings and resolve issues or agree to follow up at later dates and therefore alleviate the need to attend the confirmation hearings. Any confirmation of a case that is obtained is a result of successful negotiation based on the facts and circumstances of the case. The fact that this case was confirmed is a sign of a successful case. When the case is confirmed, I do send out correspondence from my office in several forms. I also have many clients who believe that things do not go as planned because many times my clients present me with expenses that are too high for them to justify thereby requiring that they adjust their spending habits and pay additional to their creditors. I am always confident in telling my clients that their expenses are high but if they have a demonstrable and reasonable need for those expenses than we can justify them. Many times, for example, I will have a client who tells me that they have $500-600 per month in medical bills but can only justify about $100. The ole saying goes, "Help me, Help you".

Posted by Barbara | February 10, 2014 | Bankruptcy & Debt

Bankruptcy case

I hired Justin Pickramenos when I filed bankruptcy, apart from a somewhat scattered disorganized office he did a good job right up until he failed to show up in court and the mortgage company took the house back, I am now being sued by Wells Fargo for court and lawyer costs as well as the HOA company.... Mr. Pickramenos will not return my numerous calls and emails I feel he did not finish the job he started and left me in a worse mess than when I started. I do not recommend him, he's too busy making money to pay attention when it counts.

Justin Pikramenos

Replied last February 10, 2014

To clarify, this client WANTED the house to go back to the mortgage company. We filed a motion to abandon to try to give back the house as quickly as possible, which was denied by the judge because of other circumstances beyond my or anyones control. I did not show up to court because I and opposing counsel had discussed the case with the judge previously and the outcome had already been determined and negotiated; there was no need to go to court again. I have explained to this client many times that she is not responsible for the amounts owed on the house and that the correspondence she is receiving is due to the courts allowing the banks to send debtor's statements for their homes in case they want to make payments. I have reassured her that she does not owe the money on the home, which is exactly the result that this client was seeking. This is merely a case of the client not understanding what I have told her numerous times. She is not being sued by wells fargo for court costs and legal fees. Wells fargo is merely sending her copies of court documents because they have to; they are completing the legal process of retaking legal title to the home. I have explained this already.

See All Client Reviews

Justin Taylor Pikramenos's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Justin
Johnny Joseph Bardine headshot
Johnny Bardine

Bankruptcy and debt lawyer | Sep 10

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  5.7 (Average)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2019.

Admonishment issued in FL, 2019

updated on 01/02/2020

An admonition means an attorney did something wrong but may still practice law. The Bar gives the lawyer an admonition in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior.

Honors

N/A

M.E. Rinker Institue for Tax and Accounting, Stetson University

Work Experience

2009 - Present

Managing Partner, Lutzky & Labayen, LLP

2008 - Present

Attorney, The PIkramenos Law Group, PLLC

2009 - 2009

Attorney, The Law Offices of Daniel C. Consuegra

2005 - 2007

, Gassman, Bates & Associates, P.A.

2005 - 2005

Law Clerk, Dennis Hernandez & Associates, P.A.

Associations

Beta Alpha Psi

Stetson Accounting Association

Education

2006

Stetson University College Of Law

Law

2003

Stetson University

B.B.A.

Publications

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2019
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution