April Riner Stafford

Attorney Stafford appeared to use her familiarity with the presiding judge to her client's advantage in ways that did not feel consistent with the principles of justice or impartiality. This created an environment where the opposing party-who had not been accused of any abuse, neglect, or unfitness-w...as denied meaningful access to their child. There was no clear or convincing evidence presented that would justify such a severe limitation, yet it was allowed to stand. This is deeply troubling in light of well-established legal precedent protecting parental rights under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000)). In my view, Stafford's conduct demonstrated a lack of regard for these constitutional rights and contributed to a result that appeared less about the best interests of the child and more about money. The use of financial threats and demands-such as proposing conditions involving large sums of money for basic parental access- Say her name EMILY GRACE

I hired this firm in a divorce and custody case. They collected thousands of dollars of evidence that was not brought out in court. My biggest proof was supenoed persons that I was charged for but 10 days after court I downloaded all the court documents to find the supenoed people were never entered ...to be served. We emailed on mental records and I explained how easy it was to get them and she emailed me saying they had it worked out but at court she changed what she had said. I feel her actions destroyed my chance of helping my child as without her using the evidence an appeal is not possible. I would not recommend this firm if you really want to help your child