E. Charles Grose Jr.

PRO

E. Charles Grose Jr.

4.0
Rating: 9.3

Licensed for 32 years

Criminal defense Lawyer at Greenwood, SC
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, Sex Crime, Violent Crime ... +2 more

404 Main St, Greenwood, SC

About E.

Biography

Statewide criminal defense practice for trials, appeals, and post-conviction relief.

Criminal defense representation for major felonies, appeals and post-conviction relief.

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Criminal Defense 30%

After 16 years of practicing as a Public Defender, I opened the Grose Law Firm in 2012, focusing on criminal defense.

30 years

30%
Sex Crime 20%

My criminal defense, appellate, and post-conviction practice includes representing people charged with sex offenses.

30 years

20%
Violent Crime 20%

30 years

20%
Appeals 15%

My appellate practice focuses on direct appeals of criminal convictions or collateral challenges of convictions through post-conviction relief (PCR) actions.

20 years

15%
Federal Crime 15%

My criminal defense practice includes representing people faces charges in Federal Court.

15%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer

Licenses

Licensed in South Carolina for 32 years

State: South Carolina

Acquired: 1993

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Location

Grose Law Firm

404 Main St, Greenwood, SC, 29646-2756

groselawfirm.com

E. Charles Grose Jr.'s Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.0 /5.0

4 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (4) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 3
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 1
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Character & Conduct

Posted by Travis | December 30, 2020 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense

Worst service ever

Refused to help my family deal with a sentencing error done by his law firm. Refused phone calls and actions to bring him home

See All Client Reviews

E. Charles Grose Jr.'s Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse E.
Dayne C. Phillips headshot
Dayne Phillips

Criminal defense lawyer | Nov 29

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. Charles is an outstanding advocate for the accused and convicted. He is an experienced criminal defense and appellate attorney. He is also one of the most knowledgeable criminal defense attorneys in South Carolina."

View All Endorsements

Experience

Rating:  9.3 (Superb)

Honors

2015

Recognition for Leadership, Guidance, and Service on Board, Justice 360

2012

The Martha Browning Dicus Award, South Carolina Public Defender Association

2008

Lawyer of the Year, South Carolina Public Defender Association

2008

Appreciation for Service as President, South Carolina Public Defender Association

2006

Outstanding Service to the Criminal Law Section as Section Chair, South Carolina Bar

1997

Distinguished Service to Department of Political Science, Furman University, Department of Political Science

Work Experience

2012 - Present

Attorney, Grose Law Firm, LLC

2008 - 2012

Circuit Public Defender, Circuit Defender For The Eighth Judicial Circuit

1999 - 2008

Chief Public Defender, Office of the Public Defender, Greenwood & Abbeville Counties

1998 - 1999

Deputy Public Defender, Orangeburg County Public Defender's Office

1996 - 1998

Assistant Public Defender, Orangeburg Public Defender's Office

Associations

2014 - 2015

South Carolina Bar, Criminal Law Section

Chair

2005 - 2008

South Carolina Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

Public Defender Representative

2005 - 2016

Justice 360 (formally Death Penalty Resource & Defense Center)

Board Member

2005 - 2006

South Carolina Bar, Criminal Law Section

Chair

2002 - 2008

South Carolina Public Defender Association

President

Sample of Legal Cases

State v. Dean

Affirmed Grant of New Trial

State v. Brown

Reversed Trial Court and Ordered Credit for Time Served

Hughey v. State

Affirmed Grant of New Sentencing Hearing

Aiken, et. al, v. Byars

Relief Granted

State v Hepburn

Mother Acquitted of Homicide by Child Abuse

State v. Langford

Abolished Solicitor Docket Control

State v. McGrier

Prior Manner of Imposing Community Supervision Revocation Held Unconstitutional

See More Legal Cases

Education

1992

University of South Carolina School of Law

1989

Furman University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2017

South Carolina Association of Circuit Court Judges 2017 Spring Conference

Expert Witness Issues in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

2017

Appellate Practice Project: Presenting Cases to the Appellate Courts Breakout Group Discussion Leader

2015

South Carolina Bar Convention 2015 Criminal Law Update, Planner and Moderator

2015

2015 Public Defender Conference

Defending Child Sex Abuse Cases

2015

2015 Blues, BBQ, & Bar CLE

Defending Child Sex Abuse Case

2014

2014 Public Defender Conference

“Stopping the Runaway Train—Getting Control of Child Sex Abuse Cases.”

2013

8th Blues, Bar-B-Q, and Bar CLE

Finally Finishing Forensic Interviews?

2012

2012 Public Defender Conference

Who’s Driving the Bus: Understanding and Confronting the Cottage Industry in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

2011

Capital Case Litigation Initiative

Dealing with the State’s Penalty Phase Case – Victim Impact and Protecting Your Client from State Evaluations

2010

Fourth Annual Best Practices Seminar

Nuts and Bolts of Defending Probation Violations

2010

2010 Public Defender Conference

Beware of Alligators: Confronting Forensic Interviews, Limiting Expert Testimony, and Blocking Improper Vouching in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

2010

19th Annual Criminal Practice in South Carolina

Death Penalty Update: From the Defense Perspective

2007

2007 Public Defender Conference

Error Preservation: Top Ten Objections and Five Tips

2006

Blues, Bar-B-Q, and Bar CLE

Example of Closing Argument using PowerPoint

2003

2003 Public Defender Conference

Sex Offense Cases

2002

Hot Tips

ABWIK and ABHAN: Defining the Difference in a Way that Helps the Client

2001

Ethics Seminar

Balancing the Duty to the Court with Zealous Representation of the Client: An Argument for Full Funding of the Criminal Justice System

Publications

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution