Darrin A. Auito

Darrin A. Auito

5.0
Rating: 7.3

Licensed for 21 years

Intellectual property Lawyer at Tysons, VA
Practice Areas: Intellectual Property, Litigation, Business

1765 Greensboro Station Pl Fl 9, Tysons, VA

About Darrin

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Intellectual Property 70%

Services: Patents (mechanical, electrical, software), Trademarks, Copyrights, PTAB, ITC, Freedom-to-Operate, Litigation, Counseling. Industries: Automotive, Energy, Medical Device, UAV, Blockchain, Payments, Consumer Products

20 years | 2,000 cases

70%
Litigation 20%

Intellectual Property Litigation (PTAB, District Court, Federal Circuit); Utility Patents, Design Patents, Trademarks, Unfair Competition.

20 years | 13 cases

20%
Business 10%

Startup, Venture & Small Business Law

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 250-500 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Michigan for 21 years

State: Michigan

Acquired: 2004

Active in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Location

HEA Law, PLLC

1765 Greensboro Station Pl Fl 9, Tysons, VA, 22102-3467

HEA Law, PLLC

440 Burroughs Street, Detroit, MI, 48202

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Darrin A. Auito's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

4 Client Reviews

5 star (4)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (0)

Posted by Logan | June 23, 2018 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Trademark Attorney

I hired Darrin for a trademark case. Darrin is a great attorney. He is prompt and very good with follow-ups. You can easily feel that he cares about you and your case. His pricing policy is very reasonable too. I will use and recommend Darrin in the future for sure. 5 Stars

Posted by Evandro | June 22, 2018 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Strong intellectual counsel capacity and high personal standards of excellence.

In our own journey navigating the IP waters and the many concerns with properly protecting our current and future work, Darrin's personal attention and dedication is, simply put, superior. He is energetic in drawing from the excitement of the inventor and the innovation process. This makes him sta...nd out, because as an entrepreneur who is passionate, I cherish working with folks who share in the same excitement. His insights are great; his ability to scale the work in line with the available budget offers a very flexible and tenable method of moving the patent process while aligned with the available resources. His goal is not a paycheck; it is the success of the client in reaching the IP protection that is desired. He is a central person in making the patent process work efficiently and with the highest positive impact on ROI. I dare say the patent process is very exciting with Darrin as part of the team!

Posted by Simon | June 21, 2018 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Smooth Transparent Process

We hired Darrin's firm to manage a service mark application. The process was professional, smooth and transparent. The application was completed and submitted in a very reasonable time frame.

Posted by Brian | February 25, 2018 | Consulted Attorney

This review is from a potential client who consulted with this attorney.

Patent Attorney review

Darrin gave me advice about filing a patent application in the US and Japan. He explained the new patent laws in both the US and Japan. He is very knowledgeable on both US and Japanese patent laws. He clearly explained how the newest laws and regulations affect patent protection in the US and Japan. ...He is very knowledgeable on many different technology areas, including software, computers, blockchain, cryptocurrency, electrical, mechanical, etc.

See All Client Reviews

Darrin A. Auito's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Darrin
Joshua Eugene Hummer headshot
Joshua Hummer

Intellectual property lawyer | Mar 10

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I have worked with Darrin several times on IP litigation matters and he has always impressed me with his understanding of the law and thorough preparation. I wholeheartedly endorse him!"

View All Endorsements
Joshua Eugene Hummer headshot
Joshua Hummer

Litigation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  7.3 (Very Good)

Honors

1999

Academic Fellowship Award, National Institute of Occupational Safety & Health (NIOSH)

Work Experience

2017 - Present

Partner, Hubbs, Enatsky & Auito, PLLC

2004 - 2017

Partner, Westerman Hattori Daniels & Adrian LLP

2001 - 2004

Patent Agent, Fay Sharpe, LLP

Associations

2018 - Present

The Tower Club - Tysons Corner

Membership Committee - Ambassador

2018 - Present

Kettering University Alumni Association

Washington, DC - Chapter Founder

2018 - Present

Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council (SBEC) - Washington, D.C.

Advisory Board

2012 - Present

Federal Circuit Bar Association

Member

2004 - Present

State Bar of Michigan, Intellectual Property Law Section

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Orbit Irrigation Products, Inc. v. Melnor, Inc. (Utah 1:16-cv-00137)

Melnor, Inc. v. Orbit Irrigation Products, Inc. (W.D. Virginia 5:16-cv-00059)

Orbit Irrigation Products, Inc. v. Melnor, Inc. (Utah 1:16-cv-00045)

Duel Co., Inc. v. Bass Pro Shops Outdoor World, LLC. (S.D. Florida 14-cv-20046-PAS)

Nidec v. LG Innotek (E.D. Tex. 6:07-cv-108)

Trounson Automation v. Yasakawa Electric, Sanyo Denki, Elecktro Beckhoff GmbH, et al. (E.D. Tex. 2:05 – CV – 355)

Wabash Nat., L.P. v. Vanguard Nat. Trailer Corp. (N.D. Ind. 4:06-cv-135)

Certain Windshield Wipers and Components Thereof, 337-TA-964 (U.S. International Trade Commission)

Certain Computers and Computer Peripheral Devices, 337-TA-841 (U.S. International Trade Commission)

Inkjet Ink Cartridges with Printheads and Components Thereof, 337-TA-723 (U.S. International Trade Commission)

Engines, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, 337-TA-585 (U.S. International Trade Commission)

Electric Robots and Component Parts Thereof, 337-TA-530 (U.S. International Trade Commission)

See More Legal Cases

Education

2004

Case Western Reserve University School of Law

JD

2004

Weatherhead School of Management At Case Western Reserve University

MBA - Master of Business Administration

2000

University of Michigan

M.S.E.

1998

Kettering University

B.S.E.

Speaking Engagements

2013

Japan Intellectual Property Association (JIPA)

Effective Use of Discovery Tools in U.S. Patent Litigation

2012

Japan Machinery Center for Trade and Investment (JMC) - IP Seminar

Patent Invalidity Procedures Under the AIA

2012

Japan Intellectual Property Association (JIPA)

Recent CAFC Decisions Concerning Reexamination Proceedings

2011

University of Wyoming

The Role of Intellectual Property in Your Business

2007

Tokyo Medical & Dental University - Lecture

The KSR Impact on Obviousness

Publications

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution