Carl R Schlaich

PRO

Carl R Schlaich

5.0
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 44 years

Criminal defense Lawyer at Bel Air, MD
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, DUI & DWI, Juvenile

1318 East Churchville Road, Bel Air, MD

Free Consultation

About Carl

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Criminal Defense 60%

42 years

60%
DUI and DWI 25%

42 years

25%
Juvenile Law 15%

42 years

15%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Awards

Distinguished Peer Review Rating

Licenses

Licensed in Maryland for 44 years

State: Maryland

Acquired: 1981

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Schlaich & Thompson, Chartered

1318 East Churchville Road, Bel Air, MD, 21014-4707

stclaw.net/

Online Presence

Other places you can find Carl online.

Carl R Schlaich's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

18 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (18) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Computer Fraud

Posted by Jerry | July 16, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Computer Fraud

Carl Schlaich is the greatest criminal attorney !!

There was an instantaneous, humanitarian feeling working with Carl ! In addition he is an extremely personable attorney. He made it very evident that he was a fighter for his client, and made it clear he would go to any limit (legally) to win a case for his client ! Carl will search out al...l options to guarantee your case is a success! The case I had was extremely difficult case and very convoluted. A summary of my case was as follows: I sold an iPhone and allowed and individual to use a line on my sprint account with no contract, basically "pay as you go" and subsequently terminated his service for non-payment in a timely fashion. Because this person disrespected me and refused to honor my privacy by staying away from my residence and not contacted me, in addition to hacking my Sprint account, I subsequently filed a peace order against this individual. He then filed a small claims court suit for $5000 claiming that I inconvenienced his life. The District Court of Maryland Small Claims Division suggested that each person should contact one another and try to work out issues to resolve this matter and prevent going to court, which I attempted. When I contacted the person in question trying to resolve this matter, he decided to go to the commissioners office and file criminal charges claiming phone abuse. In addition, the States Attorney filed a second criminal charge stating that I was harassing him over the phone. I initially suggested to Carl that I wanted to go to the commissioners office and file criminal charges for unauthorized Internet access of my Sprint account. Carl subsequently researched Maryland state laws and notified me that there were indeed a criminal charges for unlawful and unauthorized Internet access. Because Carl has been a defense attorney for such a long time and has adjudicated many difficult cases in his career, in various jurisdictions he was able to show me why filing criminal charges for unauthorize Internet access for my cases in Harford County, MD would be more favorable as opposed to Baltimore County because filing the criminal charges in Harford County would put more pressure on the States Attorney in this county to file criminal charges against my adversary and or drop the cases against me entirely, which they eventually did. After I filed criminal charges against my adversary for unauthorized and unlawful internet access, the Sherriffs office did not have suffucient time to serve him with the criminal charge documents for authorized and unlawful Internet access prior to the initial court hearing. Carl soon discovered at the court hearing that the papers were not served to him and instinctively went to the sheriffs office and suggested they serve him outside the court room. Carl subsequently convinced the states attorney to re-schedule the hearing and combine the cases into one trial, and inevitably dismiss the cases against me. Subsequent to this, the small claims suit resulted in the plaintiff not appearing in court and this case was dismissed with predjudice. Carl being the astute lawyer that he is, drastically changed the dynamics of the criminal charges that were pending against me, and all charges were subsequently dismissed at the next hearing.

See All Client Reviews

Carl R Schlaich's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Carl
Jonathan L Katz headshot
Jonathan Katz

Criminal defense lawyer | Feb 16

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Carl has selflessly shared his expertise and insights on criminal defense with me since I started practicing criminal defense in 1991. He has been particularly helpful in sharing his thoughts on the cases I have defended in his Harford County home base. I have and will continue to refer those in need of a lawyer to Carl when I have a scheduling conflict or co-defendant conflict."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2025

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2024

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2023

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2022

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2021

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2020

Maryland Super Lawyer in Criminal Defense 2020, Thompson Reuters

2020

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2018

Top 100 Trial Lawyers for Criminal Defense in Maryland, The National Trial Lawyers

2018

Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2018

10 Best for Client Satisfaction, American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys

2017

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers Association

2017

10 Best for Client Satisfaction, American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys

Work Experience

1998 - Present

Shareholder, Schlaich & Thompson, Chartered

1992 - 1998

Shareholder, Private Law Practice

1990 - 1992

Associate, Private Law Practice

1984 - 1990

Assistant Public Defender III, Maryland Office Of The Public Defender

1982 - 1984

Administrator I, Patuxent Institution

Associations

2018 - Present

Maryland Bar Foundation

Fellow

2017 - Present

Women's Bar Association of Maryland

Member

2013 - Present

The National Trial Lawyers

Member

1993 - Present

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

Member

1989 - Present

Harford County Bar Association

Member

1986 - Present

Maryland Criminal Defense Attorney's Association

Board of Directors

1981 - Present

Maryland State Bar Association

Member

2017 - 2018

Harford County Bar Association

President

Sample of Legal Cases

State v. L.R.

Nol Pros

R.W. v. S.C.

Petition dismissed

State v A.B.

Stet

State v. Z.C.

Not Guilty

State v. I.H.

Probation Before Judgment - reduced charge

State v. S.L.

Not Guilty

State v. R. C.

Nol pros

State v. L. D.

Nol pros

State v. M.H.

Stet

State v. J. S.

Stet

State v. L. R.

Nol Pros

State v. J. Z.

33 counts nol prossed; guilty on three counts

State v. J. D.

Not guilty all counts

See More Legal Cases

Education

1981

University of Baltimore School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1978

Randolph-Macon College

BS - Bachelor of Science

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution