Joseph P Suntum

Joseph P Suntum

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 9.4

Licensed for 43 years

Litigation Lawyer at Rockville, MD
Practice Areas: Litigation, Appeals, Land Use & Zoning, Unknown

200-B Monroe Street, Rockville, MD

About Joseph

Biography

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Appeals 33%

44 years

33%
Litigation 33%

Eminent Domain and Property Rights litigation on behalf of property owners

44 years

33%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 60 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Maryland for 43 years

State: Maryland

Acquired: 1982

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in District of Columbia for 42 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1983

Administratively Suspended - Non-Payment of Dues

No misconduct found

Location

Miller, Miller & Canby, Chartered

200-B Monroe Street, Rockville, MD, 20850-4447

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Joseph P Suntum's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Joseph P Suntum's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Joseph

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  9.4 (Superb)

Honors

2022

Best Lawyers - Eminent Domain, Best Lawyers

2022

Fellow, Litigation Counsel of America

2022

Maryland State Member Attorney, Owners Counsel of America

2021

Best Lawyers Eminent Domain, Best Lawyers

2013

Top 5% of Maryland Litigation Attorneys, Super Lawyers

2009

Top 5% of Maryland Litigation Attorneys, Super Lawyers

2008

Top 5% of Maryland Litigation Attorneys, Super Lawyers

2007

Top 5% of Maryland Litigation Attorneys, Super Lawyers

N/A

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

1988 - Present

Principal, Miller, Miller & Canby, Chartered

1900 - Present

Member, Miller, Miller & Canby Chartered

Associations

2022 - Present

Litigation Counsel of America

Fellow

Montgomery County Bar Association, Federal Practice Section

Member

Maryland State Bar Association

Member

American Bar Association, Litigation Section

Member

2019 - 2021

Owners Counsel of America

Chair

1997 - 1999

Montgomery County Bar Association

Executive Committee

1995 - 1996

Montgomery County Bar Association

Secretary

Sample of Legal Cases

• Montgomery County Board of Education v. Jean K. Phiilips, Trustee, et. al., Civil No. 364708-V

Offer: $2,300,000; Agreed Inquisition: $4,142,500

• State Highway Administration v. Landfair Properties, LLC, Civil No. CAL11-37734

Offer: $2,300,000; Settlement: $12,500,000

• Montgomery County, Maryland v. Wilgus Associates, Civil No. 325597-V

Original offer $4,819,000; Settlement: $9,669,000

• Montgomery County v. Jack F. Poole, Civil No. 334945-V

Offer: $74,650; Inquisition: $225,000

Boland v. Boland, 423 Md. 296 (2011)

Successful Appeal

• Montgomery County, Maryland v. Oakmont Limited Partnership, Civil No. 330053-V

Offer: $1,600,000; Settlement: $4,390,000

• State Roads Commission v. Bertrand T. Fang, Civil No. 295600-V

Offer $1,483,750; Agreed Inquisition: $3,698,000

• Montgomery County v. John G. Grimberg Trust, Civil No. 297479-V

Offer: $1,725,000 - Inquisition: $2,225,000

• State Roads Commission v. Frederick Dunn, Civil No. 23395-M

Offer: $704,200; Settlement: $1,056,300

• State Roads Commission v. Interdenominational Church of God, Civil Nos. 22265-M and 22226-M

Offer: $147,850; Settlement: $737,727

• State Roads Commission v. Anne M. Willson, Civil No. 285025-V

Offer: $3,750,000; Agreed Inquisition: $4,650,000

• State Roads Commission v. Donald E. McNeill, Civil No. 283022-V

Offer: $2,700,000; Settlement: $3,825,000

• SHA v. Southern Asis Adventist Association, Civil No. 281607-V

Original Offer $2,150,000; Settlement: $3,375,000

• Montgomery County, Maryland v. Montrose Medical Associates, Civil No. 259921-V

Original Offer $1,162,800; Settlement: $4,500,000

8621 Ltd. Partnership v. LDG, Inc., 169 Md. App. 214 (2006)

Successful trial; affirmed on appeal

• SHA v. Karen Leach, Trustee, Civil No. 238305

Pre-trial offer: $231,950; Inquisition: $723,751

• Schettino, et. al, v. Modanlo, Civil No 220156

$6.3 million judgment for fraud and misapproriation of corporate assets

• Circuit City Supperstores v. Rockville Pike Joint Venture, Civil No. 182973

Successful trial verdict, which was affirmed on appeal

• Cecilia Defries v. Santos, Civil No. 132068

Easement extinguished

Hassler v. Sutton

Case Dismissed by Plaintiff During Trial

Lowell Baier v. First American Bank, Civil No. 82434

New Trial Granted

Schochet v. State, 320 Md. 714 (1990)

Conviction reversed

Park Avenue Associates v. Peter Davis

Verdict in favor of plaintiff

State v. Chester Mowell

Not Guilty

See More Legal Cases

Education

1982

University of Maryland School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1979

University of Maryland

BA - Bachelor of Arts

N/A

University of Montana

Speaking Engagements

2014

Eighth Annual Virginia CLE International Virginia Eminent Domain Law & Practice Seminar Embracing New Technology: The iPad at Trial

2014

ALI-CLE, Eminent Domain and Land Value Litigation iPad at Trial: Using the iPad to Enhance Your Eminent Domain Practice

Publications

2013

ALI/ABA publication Effective Voir Dire, Opening, and Closing Argument From a Property Owner's and Condemnor's Perspective

2013

ALI-CLE Opening Statements in Eminent Domain cases

2009

ALI/ABA publication Direct Examination of a Valuation Witness

2008

ALI-ABA publications Taking Your Condemnation Case to the Next Level: Winning Ideas and Best Practices

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution