Roger R. Laguna Jr.

Roger R. Laguna Jr.

4.5
Rating: 8.2

Licensed for 30 years

Criminal defense Lawyer at Harrisburg, PA
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, Federal Crime, Sex Crime ... +3 more

Laguna Reyes Maloney Llp, 1119 N Front Street, Harrisburg, PA

About Roger

Biography

Practice Areas

6

Practice Areas

Criminal Defense 50%

Laguna Reyes Maloney, LLP, located in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, has proudly served in Pennsylvania since 1995. We have successfully handled high profile murder cases along with the multitude of other tragic cases that affect citizens and their families everyday. We have done this in state and federal courts including appeals all the way to the Supreme Court. Because our firm’s practice is focused on criminal defense, our services address criminal matters completely and comprehens

31 years

50%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 60 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Pennsylvania for 30 years

State: Pennsylvania

Acquired: 1995

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Roger R. Laguna Jr.

Laguna Reyes Maloney Llp, 1119 N Front Street, Harrisburg, PA, 171023318

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Roger R. Laguna Jr.'s Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.5 /5.0

8 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (8) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 5 of 8 reviews

Posted by Ron | January 10, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

Great attorney!

Settled a case for me! Got me a very good deal. Met with me many times and made sure I was taken good care of.

Posted by anonymous | June 09, 2021 | Hired Attorney

My Apologies

i apologize for the bad review,i made a mistake and i had a misunderstanding and i would like to apologize for that.

Posted by Yesenia | December 23, 2020 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense

Great attorney. Great person

Laguna helped me in a criminal theft case back in 2015. He went above and beyond and I couldn’t have asked for a better attorney.

Posted by Sergio | December 11, 2020 | Hired Attorney

Santiago

Súper buen abogado muy profesional y sincero con lo q puede haser por sus clientes los sabe muy bien lo q hase se los recomiendo es el mejor de harrisburg

Posted by Jake | November 16, 2018 | Criminal Defense

It's your fault if you hire him

There is a reason why Roger has bad reviews. I honestly cannot tell you how good or bad of an attorney he may be, as I couldn’t pay the guy to give me an answer for over a month, but I can tell you of my experience with Roger. I had false accusations by my crazy ex-girlfriend that landed me in jail... for months on felony strangulation. They were thrown out twice (police and prosecutors ignored video of the event I tried to submit), as I was represented by an excellent attorney. Unfortunately, that good attorney does not practice civil law which I was interested in pursuing. Que Roger. He had some good reviews online, along with some bad ones, but I was trying to keep my case local and decided to see what he thought. I met with Roger on a Friday, and he told me he thought my case was worth investigating and that he would get back to me the next week if he would take my case or not. I attempted calling that next week, but I couldn’t get through, as it turns out his secretary, Nanci, was out of office. I finally got her on the phone the following Monday. She said Roger was busy and that she would get him to contact me back. Wednesday Roger finally called me. He said that he’d been busy but was working on the case, that these things take time, etc. etc. and that he would have an answer for me by that Friday. I told him if he was busy, just tell me, and I’ll pursue my case with other lawyers. He assured me that he would have an answer for me on Friday. That Friday rolled around and…. He was out of office. He left no message for me. I was about to take a 2 week vacation, so I let him have his time to do his lawyer thing, informing Nanci to let Roger know I called. Two weeks after that, I still had not heard from Roger. I tried calling his office all week AGAIN, but his secretary was out of the office… AGAIN. I finally got one of the other attorneys to answer the phone the following Monday. Irate that Roger had lied to me twice, taken 5 weeks to sit on his thumbs while telling me twice that he would have an answer in days, I told the attorney to mail me my info back immediately and drop the case. Two days after that I get a phone call from Roger. He still hadn’t sent my info. I would not hire a guy that lied to me twice already and expected it to be ok that he blew me off. He started spinning some yarn about “These things take time,” “We’re both grown men…” But none of the baloney that came out of his mouth explained why he had told me TWICE that I would have his answer in days and it had now been 5 weeks and he was still stalling. I told him that I was disappointed that his actions did not match up to his good online reviews, and that my review was going to reflect it. After his laughable failed attempt to keep me on, he finally relented and agreed to mail my info back. To my surprise Roger overnighted my info back… along with a threatening letter I believe designed to create an inflammatory response from me for online reviews, a review which he could pursue litigation for. I was livid. He spent more time blowing smoke up my rear and typing an inflammatory response than he did on my case. From what I experienced, his office is in disarray, he lied to me directly on multiple occasions, and then he sent me an inflammatory letter. I literally waited until I was off of probation to write this review in case he tried to pull some lawyer stunt. I wonder how this particular review is going to be explained… that I was not a client? True, I couldn’t pay the guy to answer if he was going to take my case. Maybe that I imposed artificial deadlines?… the deadlines that he told me he would twice have an answer for me in days, and still was stalling 5 weeks later. Or that I was irate for him doing so? This guy thinks it’s ok to do that, and that I am the one out of line for being pissed. If you hire this guy, you deserve it.

Roger Laguna

Replied last November 16, 2018

"Jake" is correct about a few things. First, he came here and said he had been charged with felony strangulation, and various other charges in the past, and that he was currently on probation. He wanted me to "investigate" his case and, I believe, sue everyone involved in his "strangulation" case in order to get back at them for having prosecuted him. He wanted me to agree to sue several people within the week! I told him I was too busy to handle his so called "strangulation" case and I told him to look to other attorneys for assistance. In short, I rejected the case. That should have been the end ot if. However, as anonymous "jake", states, he became "livid". His response was to hurl anonymous insults via an online review. I'm not surprised at all. I did try to explain to "Jake" that investigating whether a federal lawsuit could be brought against a state attorney and others would "take time,” no matter which attorney he spoke with. A federal lawsuit is a serious matter. That is obviously the truth, and most reasonable people know it. I also did tell "Jake" that “we’re both grown men". I said this because I felt like "Jake" was acting like a spoiled child, and I demanded that he stop doing so. It was irritating and, I admit, I have little patience for that sort of person. Again, a federal lawsuit is serious business, and I refused to even waste our time arguing with what I felt was a whiny, screaming man-child about it. "Jake" was told by me to stop calling my secretary, and another female attorney in my firm, and stop assailing them with vulgar language and insults. Jake is correct that I overnighted his information to him along with a letter. I believe it when "jake" says he was "livid" when I sent him his information and refused the case. He is, in my opinion, the type of bitter little apple that becomes "livid" about whatever displeases him. I think he believes he is entitled to act like this and have people cower and accommodate him. Did I mention that anonymous "Jake" never paid us a dime? My real clients are treated with respect and dedication; they can contact me 24/7 and most have my cell phone number. Despite all of this, my parting letter to "Jake" was not at all unkind. I did suggest that he seek mental health counseling, since my experience in these matters truly led me to believe he might benefit from it. I've been doing this business more that 20 years and I believe I can spot glaring mental health problems and anger management issues that leave people "livid" for no real good reason, etc. I normally refer these folks to a mental health counselor since we are a law firm, not a hospital. "Jake" states that he "waited until [he] was off of probation to write this review". I think that's probably because I told "Jake" I would not permit him to continue to call the women at this firm and attack them with profanity and insults simply because "Jake" was "livid" - again. I tried to impress upon "Jake" that his conduct was prohibited, that he was on probation and he should not lash out at innocent ladies simply because he was "livid" about something again. The ladies at my office are not punching bags, so to speak, for someone who thinks being "livid" is an excuse to verbally abuse them, and I will not permit "Jake", or anyone else, to do so. I told "Jake" that I hope he gets counseling and finds some peace of mind. I meant that. However, I will not do business with the likes of "Jake", and I will not offer him any apology for not taking his "strangulation" case. I obviously do not take every case that walks through the door. If I did, I would not have the time and resources to provide top tier services to our actual paying clients.

See All Client Reviews

Roger R. Laguna Jr.'s Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Roger
J. Michael Sheldon headshot
J. Michael Sheldon

Unknown lawyer | Jun 02

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Roger has been a personal friend and colleague for many years. He is a strong advocate for his clients and is well known in our legal community."

Elisabeth K. H. Pasqualini headshot
Elisabeth Pasqualini

Criminal defense lawyer | Apr 27

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Roger is a seasoned veteran who is very knowledgeable and skilled in criminal defense."

Herbert Corky Goldstein headshot
Herbert Corky Goldstein

Criminal defense lawyer | Apr 12

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. Roger is not only a great criminal defense lawyer, but he is an outstanding man. He know the law and he well knows the legal system. I have interacted with him on a professional basis, and he is one of the best on ALL levels."

Laura C. Reyes Maloney headshot
Laura Maloney

Criminal defense lawyer | Apr 10

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer. I have worked with Roger for many years and know that he is very effective in obtaining results for his clients."

Steven L. Breit headshot
Steven Breit

Criminal defense lawyer | Dec 27

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Attorney Laguna is knowledgeable, skillful, and allows works diligently to effectuate his client's best interests."

View All Endorsements
Alan Michael Ross headshot
Alan Ross

Criminal defense lawyer

Jose Ronaldo Legaspi headshot
Jose Legaspi

Arbitration lawyer

Frank C. Sluzis headshot
Frank Sluzis

Criminal defense lawyer

Elisabeth K. H. Pasqualini headshot
Elisabeth Pasqualini

Criminal defense lawyer

Steven L. Breit headshot
Steven Breit

Criminal defense lawyer

Laura C. Reyes Maloney headshot
Laura Maloney

Social Security & Disability lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.2 (Excellent)

Honors

2017

Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

Select Lawyer, Select Lawyers Pennsylvania

2004

Member in Good Standing of the Association, Association of Trial Lawyers of America

2001

Pennsylvania Businessman of the Year Award, National Republican Congressional Committee

1993

Certificate of Merit, Phi Delta Phi International Legal Fraternity

1989

Diploma - CCIMP - Act 120, Pennsylvania State Police

N/A

Moot Court Competition: Quarter-Finalist, Jackson & Walker Moot Court Competition

N/A

Mock Trial Competition: Semi Finalist, Best Oral Advocate, Southern Methodist University

Work Experience

1996 - Present

Partner, Laguna Reyes Maloney, LLP

1994 - 1995

Adjunct Professor, Pennsylvania State University

Associations

2004 - Present

Pennsylvania Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

Member

2004 - Present

Pennsylvania Association For Justice

Member

2004 - Present

Pennsylvania Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

Member

1995 - Present

Pennsylvania Bar Association

Member

1995 - Present

Dauphin County Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Commonwealth vs. S. M., CP-MD-1094-2014

Charges dismissed.

Commonwealth vs. D.L.A., No. 1032 MDA 2013, Superior Court

Case Dismissed

Commonwealth vs. N. C.V., CR-1961-2010 - York County

Not Guilty

Commonwealth vs. D.B., CP-22-CR-536-2009

Charges withdrawn

Commonwealth vs. A.M.J., No. 1350 MDA 2008, Superior Court

Won on Appeal

See More Legal Cases

Education

1995

Southern Methodist University, Dedman School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

Languages

Spanish

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution