No Photo

Carl S. Chu

4.1
Rating: 6.5

Licensed for 40 years

Family Lawyer at Fishkill, NY
Practice Areas: Family, Criminal Defense, Litigation

725 Route 9, P.O. Box 438, Fishkill, NY

About Carl

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in New York for 40 years

State: New York

Acquired: 1985

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Licensed in New Jersey for 40 years

State: New Jersey

Acquired: 1985

License Administratively Revoked

No misconduct found

Location

Carl S. Chu

725 Route 9, P.O. Box 438, Fishkill, NY, 12524-1388

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Carl S. Chu's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.1 /5.0

9 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (9) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | 1 star

Posted by Chris | December 23, 2021 | Hired Attorney | Family

A True Piece of work

I worked with Carl on an ongoing family court matter. From our initial phone call. His intent and misconduct was blatantly observed. Our case was messy and long drawn out. When I tried to give Carl a summary of the history of our case. He replied "... I'm not interested in any history, when I want ...history I'll ask for it.". He went on to say " I'm here to reel you in Mr ......., I'm a 30 year friend of Judge -----, & I have trained both opposing counsel and the attorney for the child". ( Glad I took a friend's advice and recorded our conversation.). Although we met under pandemic and at a time social interaction was greatly limited. Carl refused to share an email. For purposes of correspondence. He advised me " If you have something to say write me a letter". When I wrote and sent certified letters to his office. They were forwarded to Teterboro NJ. The office address he provided is for a building that has been vacant for sometime. I tracked my certified letter to a post office in Hopewell. After intercepting my own letter. I was able to glean his actual office address. Which when Google searched. Comes up listed as a vaccum company. Carl refused to acknowledge my petitions, failed to come up to speed on my case, and even blew off our deadline for discovery. He files a motion to be relieved as my counsel. Stating he was well versed as to the facts and circumstances of our case. Upon his exit . I requested a copy of my file. Carl issued me a hand full of documents. Although our case had been ongoing for years and the files I have contains hundreds of documents. Carl is a the equivalent of a "hitman" for the Dutchess County Family Court. I documented instances where he did not confer with me prior to, or after appearances. There was even an instance where he didn't show for court. Oddly on that day and representing myself pro se. I was able to get the current petition dismissed. I am not the only person Carl has done this too. But I can assure you the buck stops here. I will use any and all documentation I have obtained and retained. To ensure he is no longer allowed to operate in this fashion. The detailed grievance I have compiled against Carl. Complete with audio files of his blatant misconduct. Will be filed with the Bar and any and all governing bodies. In hopes of ending this criminal behavior, and / or drawing the much needed attention. To the broke Dutchess County Family Court system. Which grossly misuses their power and is in desperate need of reform . If your are thinking of working with Carl, or Carl is appointed as your counsel. Do yourself a favour. Find someone else, or represent yourself. As Carl has one agenda. His own. See you at the bar hearing Carl! Can't wait to hear how you articulate your argument against your recorded statements.....!

Posted by anonymous | November 25, 2014 | Real Estate

Do not use Carl Chu Law

I used him to close my property in NY. I did not see the HUD numbers until the very last moment of closing. Have no time to verify it at all. Found a mistake later on about $200, who knows where that money go. He is kind of force you to do things his way. Charge $500 for avoid disclosure, even though... I told him I will fully disclose property information, he still charge that fee at closing. I would not recommend him at all!

Carl Chu

Replied last November 25, 2014

Dear Ms. X. Z., I am sorry that you are disappointed with my representation. I wish that you had contacted me directly to address the issues rather than choosing to use an online forum in an attempt to intentionally create a negative impact on my business. In addition, provided that you have chosen AVVO as the place to voice your concerns, please allow me to address your concerns via this same forum in turn. 1. “I did not see the HUD numbers until the very last moment of closing.” “Found a mistake later on about $200, who knows where that money go.” This is an incorrect statement as you received the financial figures via email 2 days prior to closing. My office also went over the closing figures with you over the telephone several times prior to closing and kept you updated throughout the actual closing. We also reviewed the HUD numbers after closing and you raised no objections so I am confused as to your statement regarding a mistake about $200.00. In addition the HUD is reviewed for errors by several attorneys prior to and at closing. In reference to your statement about the mistaken $200.00 fee, I reviewed this with you immediately after closing. This fee was for the drafting of the power of attorney per your instructions as you chose to not attend the closing. You were insistent about having the power of attorney in place from our initial meeting. As the seller’s attorney, I do not prepare the HUD, and I do not receive the final HUD until I am actually at the closing table. 2. “Charge $500 for avoid disclosure, even though I told him I will fully disclose property information, he still charge that fee at closing.” You are referring to the Property Condition Disclosure Statement. I did not charge you that fee at closing. That is credit that you as the Seller chose to give to the purchaser at closing rather than providing the Property Condition Disclosure Statement, which had to be given before contracts were drafted. We discussed this before contracts were sent out and you chose to give the credit rather than providing the disclosure. 3. I would also like to remind you that your property was burglarized and vandalized with racial epithets 24 hours prior to closing and we were still able to close the deal as scheduled on August 28, 2013. As you will recall, the purchasers wanted to hold back $5,000.00 in Escrow, and through extensive negotiations with the purchaser’s attorney including into the late night hours before closing day, I was able to avoid any money being held back in escrow. 4. As you may also recall, you signed a retainer agreement that specified that I could charge you at a rate of $300.00 an hour in addition to my normal fee if any problems arose at or prior to closing. As mentioned above there were several unusual occurrences including a burglary, and vandalism indicating hate crime and I did not charge you one cent extra. As I told you after the closing, this was an unusual closing, which took three hours to complete and I also did not charge you anything extra despite the additional time spent. In closing, I would like to address the crux of the matter, which was that you were unhappy with the charge for the Power of Attorney that you insisted on, and which we discussed prior to and after closing. It is unfortunate that you have to malign me on this forum in an attempt to damage my reputation.

See All Client Reviews

Carl S. Chu's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Carl

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.5 (Good)

Education

N/A

Suffolk University

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution