Matthew Walter Siegal

Matthew Walter Siegal

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review

Licensed for 38 years

Intellectual property Lawyer at New York, NY
Practice Areas: Intellectual Property

180 Maiden Lane Floor 17, New York, NY

Claim Profile

Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.

About Matthew

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in New York for 38 years

State: New York

Acquired: 1988

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Location

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan

180 Maiden Lane Floor 17, New York, NY, 10038

Dilworth & Barrese

48 S Service Rd, Melville, NY, 11747-2335

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Matthew Walter Siegal's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Matthew Walter Siegal's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Matthew

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Associations

New York Intellectual Property Law Association

Member

Education

1987

Fordham University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1984

Cornell University

BS - Bachelor of Science

Publications

2007

The Practical Litigator New Challenges Of Proving ‘Market Power’ In Patent Tying Cases

2006

Patent Strategy & Management Does Bankruptcy Absolve Patent Infringement Liability?

2006

The Intellectual Property Strategist New Antitrust Considerations for Tying Schemes

2005

The Intellectual Property Strategist You’re Not Exhausted: U.S. Patent Rights are Not Exhausted by Foreign Sales

2004

New York Law Journal Selecting the Right Forum for a Patent Dispute

2004

Intellectual Property Strategist Interpreting Patent Claims

2004

Patent Strategy & Management Chickens First or Eggs: Pre-Filing Commercialization Efforts

2003

The Intellectual Property Strategist Whether to Cancel National Trademark Registration In Favor of a CTM

2001

Patent Strategy & Management When Trust is Not Enough: The Duty to Investigate Before Filing

2001

Patent Strategy & Management Patents’ Effect on Trade Dress Protection

2001

International Legal Strategy Business Method Patents: Recent Developments in Examination, Legislation and Litigation

2001

The Intellectual Property Strategist The Amazon.com Case: Proof That Current Laws and Practice Are Adequate?

2000

Patent Strategy & Management Prozac Patents Satisfied Best Mode Where Omitted Material Was Known and Not Claimed

2000

The Intellectual Property Strategist To Translate or Not to Translate, That is the Question

2000

The Intellectual Property Strategist A Look at Eli Lilly: When Must An Application disclose Unclaimed Subject Matter?

2000

Patent Strategy & Management Eight Pitfalls of Provisional Practice

1999

The Intellectual Property Strategist Utilitarian Objects: Why the Sum is Less Than the Parts

1999

The Intellectual Property Strategist New Risk to Intellectual Property: Can States Infringe with Impunity?

1999

The Intellectual Property Strategist Are States Now Immune from Patent and Trademark Infringement Suits?

1999

International Legal Strategy Enforcement of U.S. Patent Rights Through The International Trade Commission
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution