Matthew Brendan Tuohy

Matthew Brendan Tuohy

4.8
Rating: 6.5

Licensed for 27 years

Criminal defense Lawyer at Huntington, NY
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense

7 High Street, Suite 300, Huntington, NY

About Matthew

Biography

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in New York for 27 years

State: New York

Acquired: 1999

Due to Reregister within 30 days of Birthday

No misconduct found

Location

The Tuohy Law Group, P.L.L.C.

7 High Street, Suite 300, Huntington, NY, 11743

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Matthew Brendan Tuohy's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.8 /5.0

49 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (49) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews | Punctuality

Posted by Matthew | August 26, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense

Unqualified Ignoramous

My former attorney, Matthew Tuohy, whom I would NEVER reccomend anyone hire has demonstrated gross professional misconduct, dereliction of duty, and behavior so egregious it has irreparably prejudiced my criminal defense and compromised my ongoing civil litigation. His actions or more accurately, his... complete failure to act warrant not only discipline but permanent disbarment. Timeline of Representation April 26, 2025: I retained Mr. Tuohy, paying him $1,500. May 1, 2025: I provided him with fully drafted motions, subpoenas, evidence preservation demands, and FOIL requests ready to be filed immediately. He filed none. June 18, 2025: I terminated him for nonperformance. June 30, 2025: I formally discharged him on the record in court. He failed to appear at his own discharge, despite being in the courthouse that day. July–August 2025: Despite repeated written demands, he has not refunded the unearned retainer and has not turned over my case file, discovery, or critical property. Specific Failures and Prejudice Nonappearance: He failed to appear at my arraignment and later missed a court date after instructing me not to come, causing a warrant to be issued and become part of my case's record, he had to recall the warrant as it was his error. he shrugged it off like it wasnt a big deal, but i had interactions with police that day and couldve been arrested for his mistake. Neglect of Filings: He ignored all motions, subpoenas, and preservation requests even though they were provided to him fully prepared. 70+ days passed with him doing absolutely nothing didnt even review the materials i sent him or acknowledge when i said i had critical material evidence for both my criminal and civil cases i needed recoveried as they were actively attempting to destroy it Communication Breakdown: He avoided actually reading any of the emails I sent him and online file access records show he NEVER EVEN OPENED the documents I sent him but he pretended like he had. He once placed a missed call but, upon learning who it was when i texted him back, he never responded. Withholding Property & Files: Despite multiple demands, he has refused to return my file, discovery, and personal property—an egregious violation of Rule 1.16(e). Failure to Refund: He has not returned the $1,500 unearned fee, a violation of Rule 1.15(c)(4). Irreparable Prejudice: His inaction deprived me of exculpatory evidence, left me without critical personal property, and prejudiced my ability to continue related civil litigation. Violations of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR Part 1200) Rule 1.1 (Competence): Inability or unwillingness to perform even basic tasks. Rule 1.3 (Diligence): Abandoning the case, missing appearances and deadlines. Rule 1.4 (Communication): Failing to keep client informed or respond to inquiries. Rule 1.15(c)(4) (Safekeeping Property): Failure to promptly refund unearned fees. Rule 1.16(e): Failure to return files and property upon termination. Rule 8.4(d): Conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. Mr. Tuohy’s refusal to act or return my file has left me unable to hire replacement counsel and placed me at risk of judicial sanctions. This conduct is not mere negligence; it reflects malicious indifference and contempt for his professional obligations. His ongoing refusal to refund unearned fees and return my property amounts to theft.

Posted by anonymous | May 03, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

Excellent Lawyer

Matty is a highly experienced A- Class lawyer. He is very professional and a tough fighter, not to mention a kind person. Matty has gone the extra mile to treat my case with generous care. He made me feel confident of the outcomes and reduced my stress. He was present on every appearance date. I high...ly recommend Matty to represent your case!

Posted by Craig | March 07, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense

EXCELLENT ATTORNEY

Matt Tuohy is a top Notch Lawyer...He goes up and beyond to help you when you in a tight situation..He help me and my family in Nassau County Court And Suffolk especially when some Cops try to advantage on certain situations..Just when you things are for the worst Matt finds away to get thing better,...looking at all angles....AND THE MOST IMPORTANT THING HE SHOWS UP AND ALWAYS ANSWER YOUR PHONE CALL BY TEXT OR VERBALLY... THANK YOU FOR TAKING CARE OF ME AND MY FAMILY...

See All Client Reviews

Matthew Brendan Tuohy's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Matthew

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.5 (Good)

Work Experience

2000 - Present

Partner, Palermo Tuohy Bruno

Sample of Legal Cases

Man Accused of Taking Photos of 8-Year-Old Boy in Bathroom

Case won, charges dropped

See More Legal Cases

Education

1992

Villanova University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

N/A

Widener Univ SC of Law

Languages

English

Spanish

Russian

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution