We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
I believe one of my greatest strengths in practicing law is my ability to take a legal problem or issue, hold it upside down, and shake it violently until something useful falls out. I enjoy tackling the complex, complicated, and uncertain. Often, I approach litigation as a chess match, where I must think beyond the immediate motion or argument at hand, to better ensure that the tactics chosen will best align with sound-strategy, and, ultimately, my client's goals.
4
Practice Areas
14 years
14 years
14 years
14 years
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: New York
Acquired: 2011
No misconduct found
900 Merchants Concourse, Westbury, NY, 11590
1 Client Review
Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review
Posted by Victoria | March 28, 2023 | Hired Attorney | Foreclosure
Simply Great!
Austin is a very knowledgeable, down-to-earth, and extremely friendly attorney who will give utmost care and attention to your legal matter. I retained him in my foreclosure case and could not be happier with his performance, professionalism, and positive attitude.
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
Real estate lawyer
2015 - Present
Litigation Attorney, RAS Boriskin, LLC
2012 - 2015
Litigation Attorney, Shapiro, DiCaro & Barak, LLC
Affirmed, with costs. Court held that borrower's conduct provided an inference that she deliberately avoided notice of action, and that she her challenge to the mandatory notice did not demonstrate a meritorious defense.
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Appellate Division affirmed, with costs, holding that it was the defendant's burden to prove his defense, not plaintiff's to disprove. This is the first NY appellate decision on standing that only referencing the note (no mention of the mortgage).
Appellate Division affirmed the motion court, and for the first time held that, following a default in pleading, a defendant was "precluded" from raising the statutory notice as defense, absent a reasonable excuse for the default.
Leave to intervene denied, and court held that proposed intervenor was bound by its predecessor's default in pleading and waiver of standing defense.
Appellate Division reversed the trial court, and rejected the defendant's other defenses (not addressed by the trial court).
Appellate Division affirmed the motion court, with costs.
Appellate Division reversed the trial court, and awarded summary judgment to the plaintiff.
2010
JD - Juris Doctor
English
Legal Answers
How can a lost cemetery plot deed be located if you don't remember where you purchased it do to old age?
28 May 2016
Does 20 day period in notice to admit include weekends?
27 May 2016