Austin Thomas Shufelt

Austin Thomas Shufelt

5.0
Rating: 6.3

Licensed for 14 years

Litigation Lawyer at Westbury, NY
Practice Areas: Litigation, Foreclosure, Appeals, Debt Collection

900 Merchants Concourse, Westbury, NY

About Austin

Biography

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Litigation 45%

14 years

45%
Foreclosure 35%

14 years

35%
Appeals 15%

14 years

15%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in New York for 14 years

State: New York

Acquired: 2011

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Location

RAS Boriskin, LLC

900 Merchants Concourse, Westbury, NY, 11590

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Austin Thomas Shufelt's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

Filter Avvo Reviews (1) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 1
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 0
Practice Areas
What Clients Mention

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review

Posted by Victoria | March 28, 2023 | Hired Attorney | Foreclosure

Simply Great!

Austin is a very knowledgeable, down-to-earth, and extremely friendly attorney who will give utmost care and attention to your legal matter. I retained him in my foreclosure case and could not be happier with his performance, professionalism, and positive attitude.

See All Client Reviews

Austin Thomas Shufelt's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Austin

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Thomas Weiss headshot
Thomas Weiss

Real estate lawyer

Experience

Rating:  6.3 (Good)

Work Experience

2015 - Present

Litigation Attorney, RAS Boriskin, LLC

2012 - 2015

Litigation Attorney, Shapiro, DiCaro & Barak, LLC

Sample of Legal Cases

PHH v Muricy

Affirmed, with costs. Court held that borrower's conduct provided an inference that she deliberately avoided notice of action, and that she her challenge to the mandatory notice did not demonstrate a meritorious defense.

Arch Bay Holdings, LLC-Series 2010C v Daisy

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Bank of N.Y. Mellon v Green

Appellate Division affirmed, with costs, holding that it was the defendant's burden to prove his defense, not plaintiff's to disprove. This is the first NY appellate decision on standing that only referencing the note (no mention of the mortgage).

PHH v Celestin

Appellate Division affirmed the motion court, and for the first time held that, following a default in pleading, a defendant was "precluded" from raising the statutory notice as defense, absent a reasonable excuse for the default.

HSBC Bank USA v Martin-Lloyd

Leave to intervene denied, and court held that proposed intervenor was bound by its predecessor's default in pleading and waiver of standing defense.

PHH v Israel

Appellate Division reversed the trial court, and rejected the defendant's other defenses (not addressed by the trial court).

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Quinn

Appellate Division affirmed the motion court, with costs.

PHH v Davis

Appellate Division reversed the trial court, and awarded summary judgment to the plaintiff.

See More Legal Cases

Education

2010

Albany Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution