Dennis J. Dozis

Affirmed. Alleged procedural missteps did not deny plaintiff's son right to free and appropriate public education, deprive son of educational benefits, or preclude plaintiff from participating in decisionmaking process concerning son's education.

The Honorable Jack B. Weinstein of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York granted the defendants' motions and held that the hospital's discharge did not violate EMTALA.

Order modified, on the law, to the extent of denying plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, and granting defendant Merrimack's cross motion for summary judgment, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Affirmed.

So much of defendant-medical college's motion as sought to dismiss the plaintiffs' Monell claim against it was granted.

District Court's judgment affirmed.

Order affirmed, with one bill of costs to the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered July 22, 2010, which granted defendant 707, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

District Court granted defendant-psychologist's motion, dismissing all but one of the claims against him (Court subsequently disposed of co-defendant's motion and dismissed remaining claim against psychologist).

Claims against defendant-psychiatrist dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6).

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from and, upon searching the record, summary judgment is awarded to the defendants 650 Crown Equities, LLC, and Hager Management, Inc., dismissing all of the Labor Law causes of action asserted against them.

Order modified by deleting provision denying branch of defendants' motion which was to compel plaintiff to provide authorizations for release of plaintiff's alcohol and drug abuse records, and substituting a provision granting that branch of motion.

The New York State Court of Appeals reversed and reaffirmed the rule that litigants cannot ignore court orders with impunity.

Order affirmed.

Order modified by deleting the provision denying those branches of the cross motion of the defendant Arrow Line Striping Co. which were for summary judgment dismissing the cross claims for common-law indemnification asserted against it.

Affirmed, with costs.

The District Court granted the defendant-a consulting psychologist's motion and dismissed all of the claims against him pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6).

Defendant court-appointed forensic evaluator's motion was granted and all of the claims asserted against him were dismissed.

Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed.

Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and the motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against defendants 190 and L'Occitane granted.

Order affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Order reversed, on the law, and the motion of the defendant Doshi Diagnostics Imaging Services, P.C., to compel the plaintiffs to return to it all original mammogram films related to the plaintiff Sofiya Chervonskaya was granted.

Order affirmed, with costs

Order affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Order reversed, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and the motion to change venue of the action from Kings County to Westchester County granted.

Order affirmed, with costs.