Daniel K Newman

Daniel K Newman

4.0
Rating: 8.0

Licensed for 50 years

Divorce and separation Lawyer at Voorhees, NJ
Practice Areas: Divorce & Separation, Litigation, Child Custody

1202 Laurel Oak Road, The Greens of Laurel Oak, Suite 207, Voorhees, NJ

About Daniel

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Divorce and Separation 80%

I have extensive experience in handling divorce, separations, marital settlement agreements, alimony, child support, and same-sex dissolutions.

51 years | 400 cases

80%
Child Custody 10%

I have represented parents in child custody disputes involving legal custody, physical custodyand parenting-time issues either by negotiating a settlement or going to trial, if necessary.

51 years | 100 cases

10%
Litigation 10%

I have litigated over 125 trials in the State and Federal courts in New Jersey. I am a member of the Million Dollar Advocates Forum.

51 years | 1,000 cases

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 45 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in New Jersey for 50 years

State: New Jersey

Acquired: 1975

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Daniel K. Newman

1202 Laurel Oak Road, The Greens of Laurel Oak, Suite 207, Voorhees, NJ, 08043

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Daniel K Newman's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.0 /5.0

8 Client Reviews

5 star (6)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (2)

Posted by Jerry | February 12, 2019 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Made a good choice

I knew that my case involving divorce after a long marriage would be complex so I interviewed five other attorneys before selecting Mr. Newman to represent me. Every interaction with Mr. Newman and his staff underscored that I had made the correct choice. Mr. Newman routinely impressed me with his pr...ofessionalism and vast knowledge of all facets of family law. At the same time, he always patiently listened and responded to my concerns with empathy and the utmost respect. I highly recommend his services.

Posted by Nika | March 15, 2018 | Consulted Attorney

This review is from a potential client who consulted with this attorney.

So rude, doesn’t care much for new clients

I called for a free consultation and Daniel was extremely rude to me. You could hear the great deal of annoyance with my questions in his voice as if I wasn’t worth even talking to. He was short with me and didnt seem like he even wanted to give a free consultation even though that is what he adverti...ses. I was looking for an attorney who specializes in family law, and he would of been the last lawyer on my list to choose from because of how insignificant he made me feel. He was so terrible and not very friendly at all. Why would you advertise free consultations if you don’t feel like dealing with people for free? Also, he very very judgemental due to the nature of my case. I recommend to not even waste your time on Daniel. He was Extremley rude to me, and not friendly at all. I noticed he doesn’t care for you unless you are willing to pay money and hire him right away. Never will I ever even consider hiring him as an attorney and I will be sure to tell others and spread this message to not hire him, he gave me maybe 2 minutes of his time on the phone. Super unprofessional and obviously not passionate about his work and his clients.

Daniel Newman

Replied last March 16, 2018

This review is extremely unfair and untrue. I am sorry that this conversation was taken the wrong way. I do offer free consultations. Generally, these are not telephone consultations, however. The only exception is if the potential client is from out of state or he/she has a disability or other unique problem. In any event, I did speak with this particular person on March 15, 2018, via telephone. My staff transferred the call to me because it was a simple, straightforward question about the ability of the New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency to impose certain types of testing upon parents. The answer that I provided to this person was clear-cut under New Jersey law with little, if any, room for subjective interpretation. I am sorry if the answer I gave was unfavorable and not what this person wanted to hear. Unfortunately, sometimes lawyers have to give answers and advice to people which is not favorable to them. Please note that there was absolutely no discussion of signing a retainer agreement or any financial arrangement with me as I would have been unable to successfully assist this person under governing New Jersey law. I try to always be honest with people who ask for my legal advice. I was not being short or in any way judgmental with respect to this person. I have represented many people in these types of situations, and I am quite understanding of their problems.

Posted by Lisa | November 17, 2016 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Daniel Newman - Do Not Hire***

This should be the most basic case for any lawyer when it comes to custody law in the State of New Jersey. Daniel Newman was an absolute failure. Broken down.. My ex husband/ my 15 yr old son's father passed away from a heart attack suddenly. My late ex and I shared custody of the child, keepi...ng the custody arrangement out of the courts the child's entire life with no problems. Everyone was happy. Upon his fathers death his grandparent petitioned for custody and parental rights. (The child and father lived with the grandparents in an apartment above there house prior to the fathers death.) I have been an elementary school teacher for the state of New Jersey for 14 years, I have a son that's 3 years old and have been married for four years. I own a house and two cars. I am a completely fit parent 100% of the time. I provided all the factual information to back this up to Mr. Newman and to the courts. I should have no problems in court right? WRONG. We get into court and somehow I lost my rights as a mother and a parent to the child's grandparents. The judge decides to make a schedule for myself and the child's grandparents to share time with the child. We never received any schedule even after repeatedly asking Mr. Newman to help us. We owed $300 on a $3,200 dollar bill so nothing was done. This was the first HUGE mistake AFTER LOSING the original case. Mr. Newman refused to help because of a outstanding $300 bill. (I never received a schedule from the judge.) After two weeks, I made a schedule so the child could spend weekends at the grandparents house. Every single weekend. From this point the grandparents were not satisfied so they had starting convincing the child they were going to get him emancipated and that the life insurance money left to him from his father was to pay for their house and living expenses instead of college. The child came home every Sunday night talking about these suggestions from the grandparents. It became clear quickly the child had no rules and was not even being checked on while in the grandparents care. The time he did spend with the grandparents was time plotting against me, his mother. He was free to do as he pleased 24 hours a day, which meant he was playing Xbox for as many hours as he could physically fit in. So I decided it wasn't good for the child to be there overnights. I cut his visits down to weekend days, every weekend. I cut out the unsupervised sleepovers. So they brought us back to court again. At this point in time Mr. Newman had already destroyed my family. My rights as a mother and parent were taken away at the first hearing. How a completely fit mother could lose her parental rights to the child's grandparents is beyond me. If the necessary time was spent by Mr. Newman doing his due diligence I would have my rights as a mother and parent. Next, the grandparents file another court date for more parenting time. I was never summoned to court and Mr. Newman never notified me (even though he was still under retainer for this case). He claims he was never notified either. So the SECOND HUGE MISTAKE of Mr. Newman's after losing the original hearing is not informing us of a court date. Followed directly up by his THIRD HUGE MISTAKE after losing the original hearing. After he and I were apparently not informed of the court date then the case should have been dismissed. It's straight forward. Why didn't he call for dismissal at this point? Now with another court date Mr Newman asked me to pay another $750 dollar retainer fee. I could not afford another retainer. I went without a lawyer and now the grandparents have him 2 hours every day and every other weekend. His lack of action has put my family in a terrible position and we paid this man in full for his services. Though he did not serve us in any form. I have been attempting to call Mr. Newman for a week with no return calls. This can all be backed up if need be.

Daniel Newman

Replied last November 23, 2016

Unfortunately, Lisa's recitation of the facts in this case and actions taken by the court when I was representing her are totally and completely incorrect. Here is what actually happened: The child’s grandparent’s filed papers to become legal custodians of the child as he and his father had been living with them when the father died suddenly of a heart attack. Lisa retained my office to oppose the grandparent’s order to show cause and wanted sole custody of her son. We filed opposing papers and argued the matter in court. The decision of the court was to give Lisa sole custody of the child and permit the grandparents visitation with a goal for the child to spend the majority of overnights with Lisa. There was to be a second hearing. At this point, Lisa advised our office that she did not wish to incur any additional counsel fees for continued litigation with the grandparents. We prepared and forwarded to her a Substitution of Attorney. Apparently, the grandparents filed one or more subsequent applications with the court. Our office was never served with any of these subsequent documents as we were no longer her attorneys. Insofar as what transpired between the grandparents, the court and my former client Lisa after that point, I have no idea as we were not involved in any way. Lisa's statement that I “destroyed her family and her rights as a parent were taken away at the first hearing” is a total fabrication as she was granted “sole custody” of her child at the first and only hearing I was involved in as confirmed in writing in the court order. Lisa called and spoke with two members of my staff and I, and was questioning things that happened after she elected to represent herself. I and my staff advised her that we could not comment upon or render an opinion as to subsequent decisions made by the court after our representation ended. At her request, we forwarded a copy of her file to her. We are sorry that Lisa does not seem to understand the fact we have no knowledge of, were not privy to and are not responsible for the decisions made by the court after our representation ended.

Posted by Linda | November 12, 2014

Best Lawyer!!

Mr. Newman is an excellent lawyer. He was my lawyer for my divorce and the two times that I have had to return back to court after my divorce. He takes the time to be sure that everything you need will be taken care of. He stays in contact with you to keep you updated. He is always a phone call away.... When I called him back 2 years later he still knew who I was. I didn't feel like just another client. I can not say enough good things about him and his staff. I always feel I can call him and he will answer any questions that I might have. I would highly recommend him.

Posted by Lori | November 7, 2014

Good Intentions

I would recommend Mr. Newman to anyone who needs help in any difficult situation. From my personnel experience, my case was and still is very difficult and Mr. Newman never gave up to finding the best conclusion. He has been there since day 1 and I wouldn't know what to do without him. It's more than... a case to him, he cares about you too.

See All Client Reviews

Daniel K Newman's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Daniel
Lisa E Alexander headshot
Lisa Alexander

Family lawyer | Nov 06

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. Mr. Newman is empathetic and caring to his clients and works diligently to prepare for trial should other alternatives be unsuccessful."

Timothy J Rice headshot
Timothy Rice

Litigation lawyer | Oct 27

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I fully endorse Dan Newman. He is an outstanding attorney who works tirelessly on behalf of his clients and achieves excellent results. Mr. Newman's has a tremendous knowledge of the law and extensive litigation experience."

View All Endorsements
James L Pantages headshot
James Pantages

Litigation lawyer

Timothy J Rice headshot
Timothy Rice

Elder law lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.0 (Excellent)

Honors

2018

Distinguished, Martindale-Hubbell

2018

Member, Million Dollar Advocates Forum

2014

Member, Million Dollar Advocates Forum

2006

Certificate, Million Dollar Advocates Forum

Work Experience

1994 - Present

Managing Partner, Law Offices of Daniel K. Newman

1986 - 1993

Attorney, Robinson, Newman & Boyle, Esqs.

1981 - 1985

Attorney, Stein Bliablias, McGuire & Pantages, Esqs.

1978 - 1980

Attorney, Pantages, Sellar, Richardson, Stuart, Esqs.

1976 - 1978

Attorney, Law Offices of George M. James, Esq.

1975 - 1976

Law Clerk, Hon. James T. Owens - Superior Court of NJ

Associations

2006 - Present

Million Dollar Advocates Forum

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Idell v. Kalinowski

$500,000 settlement.

Jorge Albarracin v. Crown Equipment Corp.

Verdict in favor of plaintiff: $1,012,500.00

Robert Torner v. City of North Bergen

Settled for $150,000

Lee vs. Jersey City Medical Center

$381,000 jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs

See More Legal Cases

Education

1975

St. Marys University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1971

University of Notre Dame

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution