Free Consultation
$0 first 45 minutes
3
Practice Areas
51 years | 400 cases
51 years | 100 cases
51 years | 1,000 cases
Free Consultation
$0 first 45 minutes
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: New Jersey
Acquired: 1975
No misconduct found
1202 Laurel Oak Road, The Greens of Laurel Oak, Suite 207, Voorhees, NJ, 08043
Showing 1 - 5 of 8 client reviews from Avvo
Posted by Jerry | February 12, 2019 | Hired Attorney
I knew that my case involving divorce after a long marriage would be complex so I interviewed five other attorneys before selecting Mr. Newman to represent me. Every interaction with Mr. Newman and his staff underscored that I had made the correct choice. Mr. Newman routinely impressed me with his pr...
Posted by Nika | March 15, 2018 | Consulted Attorney
I called for a free consultation and Daniel was extremely rude to me. You could hear the great deal of annoyance with my questions in his voice as if I wasn’t worth even talking to. He was short with me and didnt seem like he even wanted to give a free consultation even though that is what he adverti...
This review is extremely unfair and untrue. I am sorry that this conversation was taken the wrong way. I do offer free consultations. Generally, these are not telephone consultations, however. The only exception is if the potential client is from out of state or he/she has a disability or other unique problem. In any event, I did speak with this particular person on March 15, 2018, via telephone. My staff transferred the call to me because it was a simple, straightforward question about the ability of the New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency to impose certain types of testing upon parents. The answer that I provided to this person was clear-cut under New Jersey law with little, if any, room for subjective interpretation. I am sorry if the answer I gave was unfavorable and not what this person wanted to hear. Unfortunately, sometimes lawyers have to give answers and advice to people which is not favorable to them. Please note that there was absolutely no discussion of signing a retainer agreement or any financial arrangement with me as I would have been unable to successfully assist this person under governing New Jersey law. I try to always be honest with people who ask for my legal advice. I was not being short or in any way judgmental with respect to this person. I have represented many people in these types of situations, and I am quite understanding of their problems.
Posted by Lisa | November 17, 2016 | Hired Attorney
This should be the most basic case for any lawyer when it comes to custody law in the State of New Jersey. Daniel Newman was an absolute failure. Broken down.. My ex husband/ my 15 yr old son's father passed away from a heart attack suddenly. My late ex and I shared custody of the child, keepi...
Unfortunately, Lisa's recitation of the facts in this case and actions taken by the court when I was representing her are totally and completely incorrect. Here is what actually happened: The child’s grandparent’s filed papers to become legal custodians of the child as he and his father had been living with them when the father died suddenly of a heart attack. Lisa retained my office to oppose the grandparent’s order to show cause and wanted sole custody of her son. We filed opposing papers and argued the matter in court. The decision of the court was to give Lisa sole custody of the child and permit the grandparents visitation with a goal for the child to spend the majority of overnights with Lisa. There was to be a second hearing. At this point, Lisa advised our office that she did not wish to incur any additional counsel fees for continued litigation with the grandparents. We prepared and forwarded to her a Substitution of Attorney. Apparently, the grandparents filed one or more subsequent applications with the court. Our office was never served with any of these subsequent documents as we were no longer her attorneys. Insofar as what transpired between the grandparents, the court and my former client Lisa after that point, I have no idea as we were not involved in any way. Lisa's statement that I “destroyed her family and her rights as a parent were taken away at the first hearing” is a total fabrication as she was granted “sole custody” of her child at the first and only hearing I was involved in as confirmed in writing in the court order. Lisa called and spoke with two members of my staff and I, and was questioning things that happened after she elected to represent herself. I and my staff advised her that we could not comment upon or render an opinion as to subsequent decisions made by the court after our representation ended. At her request, we forwarded a copy of her file to her. We are sorry that Lisa does not seem to understand the fact we have no knowledge of, were not privy to and are not responsible for the decisions made by the court after our representation ended.
Posted by Linda | November 12, 2014
Mr. Newman is an excellent lawyer. He was my lawyer for my divorce and the two times that I have had to return back to court after my divorce. He takes the time to be sure that everything you need will be taken care of. He stays in contact with you to keep you updated. He is always a phone call away....
Posted by Lori | November 7, 2014
I would recommend Mr. Newman to anyone who needs help in any difficult situation. From my personnel experience, my case was and still is very difficult and Mr. Newman never gave up to finding the best conclusion. He has been there since day 1 and I wouldn't know what to do without him. It's more than...
"I endorse this lawyer. Mr. Newman is empathetic and caring to his clients and works diligently to prepare for trial should other alternatives be unsuccessful."
"I fully endorse Dan Newman. He is an outstanding attorney who works tirelessly on behalf of his clients and achieves excellent results. Mr. Newman's has a tremendous knowledge of the law and extensive litigation experience."
Litigation lawyer
Elder law lawyer
2018
Distinguished, Martindale-Hubbell
2018
Member, Million Dollar Advocates Forum
2014
Member, Million Dollar Advocates Forum
2006
Certificate, Million Dollar Advocates Forum
1994 - Present
Managing Partner, Law Offices of Daniel K. Newman
1986 - 1993
Attorney, Robinson, Newman & Boyle, Esqs.
1981 - 1985
Attorney, Stein Bliablias, McGuire & Pantages, Esqs.
1978 - 1980
Attorney, Pantages, Sellar, Richardson, Stuart, Esqs.
1976 - 1978
Attorney, Law Offices of George M. James, Esq.
1975 - 1976
Law Clerk, Hon. James T. Owens - Superior Court of NJ
2006 - Present
Million Dollar Advocates ForumMember
$500,000 settlement.
Verdict in favor of plaintiff: $1,012,500.00
Settled for $150,000
$381,000 jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs
1975
JD - Juris Doctor
1971
BA - Bachelor of Arts
English
Legal Answers