Daniel Francis Schopick

Daniel Francis Schopick

also known as Daniel F. Schopick

Licensed for 51 years

Estate planning Lawyer at Trumbull, CT
Practice Areas: Real Estate, Estate Planning, Family ... +2 more

572 White Plains Road, Trumbull, CT

Claim Profile

Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.

About Daniel

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Connecticut for 49 years

State: Connecticut

Acquired: 1976

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in New York for 51 years

State: New York

Acquired: 1974

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Location

Steiber & Schopick

572 White Plains Road, Trumbull, CT, 06611-4860

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Daniel Francis Schopick's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

5 star (0)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (1)

Posted by anonymous | January 8, 2021 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Unprofessional

Having bought & sold 9 homes, I've dealt with many attorneys and would like to share my experience with attorney Schopick. Most closings are simple: confirm payoff amount, accrued taxes & interest, & prepare a closing statement. My expectations were simple: 1) Provide good communication: 2) Ensure an... accurate Closing statement; 3) Offer legal advice when appropriate. Mr. Schopick failed in all respects:. 1) Terrible communication. Phone calls went unanswered as did an inquiry re additional legal work. 2) When the Purchase Agreement was presented for review, no legal advice was offered re potential problems of delay or options to minimize problems. 3) Inaccurate Closing statement. It is my opinion that Mr. Schopick had no interest in me as a client; no interest in offering legal advice; no interest in house closings. His inattention to detail spoke volumes. His primary concern appeared to be the minimization of effort for his $1,000 fee

See All Client Reviews

Daniel Francis Schopick's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Daniel

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Honors

N/A

Distinguished, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

1900 - Present

Member, Steiber & Schopick

Associations

Bridgeport Bar Association

Member

New York State Bar Association

Member

Connecticut Bar Association

Member

Education

1977

New York University School of Law

LL.M - Master of Laws

1973

New York Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1969

Brandeis University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution