Deena Lynn Gans

Deena Lynn Gans

4.3
Rating: 7.0

Licensed for 34 years

Divorce and separation Lawyer at Bridgeport, CT
Practice Areas: Divorce & Separation, Child Support, Uncontested Divorce ... +5 more

1335 Wood Ave, Bridgeport, CT

About Deena

Biography

Practice Areas

8

Practice Areas

Child Support 15%

35 years

15%
Alimony 10%

35 years

10%
Child Custody 10%

35 years

10%
Mediation 10%

35 years

10%
Guardianship 3%

Handling grandparents rights cases in Probate/Superior Courts

12 years

3%
Adoption 2%

35 years

2%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 60 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Connecticut for 27 years

State: Connecticut

Acquired: 1998

Active

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2017

Licensed in Florida for 34 years

State: Florida

Acquired: 1991

Retired

Location

Law Offices of Deena Lynn Gans

1335 Wood Ave, Bridgeport, CT, 066041425

Law Offices of Deena Lynn Gans

1335 Wood Ave., Bridgeport, CT, 06604

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Deena Lynn Gans's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.3 /5.0

4 Client Reviews

5 star (3)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (1)
1 star (0)

Posted by anonymous | February 25, 2025 | Consulted Attorney

This review is from a potential client who consulted with this attorney.

Experienced and knowledgeable

She is very knowledgeable and really well experienced resource in CT family law. Deena is like a very smart tough love family member and she really does look out for the best interests and setting reasonable fair expectations.

Posted by anonymous | August 25, 2022 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Horrible experience during one of the most difficult times in my life

I hired this attorney for my divorce because during the consultation I felt like she would fight for me, my children, and my rights. Once I paid the retainer, I was disappointed in her service and professionalism with me. My ex spouse kept asking for ridiculous things in the agreement, repeatedly pro...vided incomplete, partial documentation, so I constantly researched my rights and what I could do to protect myself in the final agreement. When I would ask questions, I always received abrupt, snotty responses, was accused of dragging on the divorce, or constantly reminded that my questions used up my retainer. My questions were valid questions. If they use retainer, so be it. Save the snotty commentary. I'm college educated and detail oriented and wanted to make sure the divorce agreement covered as much as possible so there could be little to no disputes with my ex spouse later. I paid for a service, not to hear about what's happening in the attorney's personal life that is making her so busy or even worse - one day she even told me how busy she was dealing with her own kids' education and activities than to deal with my questions and updates regarding the divorce. How entitled and insensitive. Great, I couldn't afford to pay for my own kids' education and activities because I had just paid her second retainer while I kept researching and fighting for my legal rights and then constantly got reprimanded by her for doing so. I felt like she just wanted this to be an open/ shut case, especially during the pandemic vs truly fighting for me and my kids' rights. I don't know if she treats every client this way or if it was just me but she sold me on the idea that she knew what it was like to go through a contentious divorce and that she would fight for me. She certainly didn't act like it. It seemed more like she fought for me to just shut up, stop asking questions, and sign the agreement without proofreading, thinking through details, or other possible scenarios to protect myself and my kids. I came across issues with the drafted agreement that put me at a huge disadvantage and even worse, possible liability for joint debt and property. I knew my ex and his shenanigans to get over on people, she didn't. When I brought up these issues, I was reprimanded several times and told that I was wasting time with "tit for tat". These weren't petty issues. These literally revolved around the whole point of divorce - dividing property and settling joint debts. I'm currently going through an issue now because the agreement was not written in a more detailed fashion for one of the debts, so I have to return to court to settle it. The same with our child custody and visitation schedule. If it had just been written the way I requested (instead of being reprimanded) I wouldn't be in a dispute with my ex and returning to court. I'll never understand why I was treated the way I was. I would not recommend this attorney unless you have an "easy", cut and dry divorce.

Posted by Migdalia | October 24, 2017 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

I highly recommend and she is a pleasure to work with

I highly recommend Attorney Deena Gans she represented me during my divorce, with no battles on the other side, we were able to negotiate. She knew the first time I met with her what my concerns were, she listened, gave me great advice, told me what my options would be and best of all we negotiated w...hat I wanted.

Posted by Angela | July 6, 2017 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Zealous & Proactive Representation

I highly recommend to litigants that they give due diligence to the process of selecting representation. It is a critical decision upon which the details of the final settlement hinge: Who will best represent my concerns? Prior to meeting with Atty. Gans, I had met with two Fairfield County at...torneys who were highly recommended to me by their former clients. After meeting with Atty. Gans, however, my choice was clear. I had found Atty. Gans online and then attended a free initial consultation within 24 hours of my inquiry. In hindsight, my first point of contact with Atty. Gans and her office was indicative of the manner in which I was treated throughout my divorce. Atty. Gans' exceptional ethical professionalism, client-centered approach to negotiation, and unwavering commitment to my overall health and and well being made her an outstanding attorney. My "best interest" always served as the filter through which all decisions were made. After our initial consultation, Atty. Gans immediately began to zealously advocate on my behalf with opposing counsel. This provided me with assurance that I was not just another file on an attorney’s desk. Instead, my family mattered to her very much. Simultaneously, Atty. Gans took the time to establish a trusting relationship with me early on. I was then able to focus on rebuilding my life emotionally, socially, and professionally. As part of her professional acumen, Atty. Gans’ was empathic to some life struggles I acquired as a function of divorce upheaval. Whenever I reached out to Atty. Gans, she herself graciously and respectfully responded to me within the hour or sooner, including evenings and weekends. Having my questions answered & concerns addressed thoroughly and in a timely manner significantly reduced my apprehensions. Further, as court professionals entered and exited my case, it was evident Atty. Gans had banked an impressive level of professional equity, inclusive of trust and respect from her peers in court/legal community. Atty. Gans worked closely with opposing counsel to expedite the process, considering all variables from different angles such that a fair resolution could be obtained. To that end, I strongly suggest potential clients seek Atty. Gans for an initial consultation before retaining another attorney. I believe you will walk away from the initial meeting feeling confident that Atty. Gans is an empathic, respectful, experienced professional who truly listens to your concerns and then successfully strives to partner with you throughout the entire process in order to achieve a fair, equitable resolution.

See All Client Reviews

Deena Lynn Gans's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Deena
Bruce S Gordon headshot
Bruce Gordon

Family lawyer | Oct 31

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. She is an ethical concerned attorney who gives straight information. While proactive in her protection of her client, she also seeks solutions for people, avoiding adding to an already difficult situation."

Karen Reynolds headshot
Karen Reynolds

Family lawyer | Nov 06

Relationship: Supervised lawyer

"I endorse this lawyer's work."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.0 (Very Good)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2017.

Conditions issued in CT, 2017

updated on 08/21/2017

A condition is a disciplinary order from the Statewide Grievance Committee that an attorney fulfill a condition within a certain time frame. If the attorney does not fulfill a condition in a timely manner, the Superior Court may also impose any condition necessary to protect the public.

Work Experience

1998 - Present

, Gans & Reynolds

Associations

2000 - Present

United States District Court

1999 - Present

Bridgeport Probate Court

Court Appointed Attorney for Minor Children

1999 - Present

Shelton Probate Court

Court Appointed Attorney for Minor Children

1998 - Present

Greater Bridgeport Bar Association, Family Law Committee

Executive Committee Member

1998 - Present

Connecticut Bar Association

1998 - Present

Bridgeport Superior Court

Special Master

1990 - Present

Florida Bar

1988 - Present

Phi Alpha Delta

Member

United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida

Sample of Legal Cases

Cioppa v Cioppa

alimony modified re: cohabitation

See More Legal Cases

Education

1990

St Thomas University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

Languages

Portuguese

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2017
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution