This lawyer cannot be reviewed
W. Thomas Smith

W. Thomas Smith

5.0
Rating: 9.8

Licensed for 50 years

Personal injury Lawyer at Boston, MA
Practice Areas: Personal Injury, Defective and Dangerous Products, Medical Malpractice, Car Accidents

Prudential Tower, 800 Boylston St. 30th Floor, Boston, MA

This attorney is currently not accepting new clients.
Reason: Not Practicing

About W.

Biography

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Personal Injury 30%

I have represented clients with injuries caused by defective consumer products, medical devices, motor vehicles, and industrial equipment, construction site negligence, medical negligence, negligent service of alcohol, defects in commercial and residential premises, motor vehicle accidents, the negligence of gas and electric utilities, and many other acts of negligence.

49 years

30%
Medical Malpractice 25%

I have represented victims of medical negligence for over 35 years.

49 years

25%
Car Accident 15%

49 years

15%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Massachusetts for 50 years

State: Massachusetts

Acquired: 1975

Retired

No misconduct found

Location

Sugarman

Prudential Tower, 800 Boylston St. 30th Floor, Boston, MA, 02199

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

W. Thomas Smith's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

Filter Avvo Reviews (1) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review

Posted by Sean | July 19, 2011

The Best Representation

Any situation where you require strong representation is generally undesired. I found myself in need of strong legal support and due to the usually high complexity of my situation, I was directed to the Sugarman law firm. Of course, to hear that my situation was too complex for some attorneys was ver...y daunting. However, during the entire experience while working with Thomas Smith, Ben Zimmermann and the entire team at Sugarman I did not ever notice anything which would indicate that my situation was highly complex or anything other than just a day's work at Sugarman. Everything which I was involved in was done in a timely manner and with the highest level of professionalism. At the Sugarman firm, paramount emphasis and priority is placed on the client and the family. From a client perspective, it's obvious that the most important goal at Sugarman is to create a perfect situation for the client/family, in order to bring closure to an undesired situation. From my first contact to the Sugarman Law Firm until the last contact, the team always responded promptly by either telephone, message or even had the time for a meeting, if required. I cannot say enough positive things about this firm. After working with them, I have a new respect for our legal profession. These gentlemen are the definition of excellence and professional; they are also clearly achievement oriented. I am thankful that my situation was handled by the team at Sugarman. This legal team is known as the "best" for good reason, I strongly recommend consulting the Sugarman firm for any legal situation which requires either delicate or aggressive representation.

See All Client Reviews

W. Thomas Smith's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse W.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  9.8 (Superb)

Honors

2014

James Esdaile Jr. Award for Civility and Professionalism, AMERICAN BOARD OF TRIAL ADVOCATES MASSACHUSETTS CHAPTER

2014

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

2013

Local Litigation Stars, Benchmark Plaintiff 2014

2013

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2013

Top 100 Super Lawyers, Massachusetts Super Lawyers

2013

Super Lawyer, Massachusetts Super Lawyers

2012

Super Lawyer, Massachusetts Super Lawyers

2012

Top 100 Super Lawyers, Massachusetts Super Lawyers

2012

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

2011

Super Lawyer, Massachusetts Super Lawyers

2011

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

2011

Lawyer of the Year, Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

2011

Top Ten Massachusetts Super Laywers, Massachusetts Super Lawyers

2010

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

2009

Super Lawyer, Massachusetts Super Lawyers

2009

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

2008

Super Lawyer, Massachusetts Super Lawyers

2008

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

2007

Super Lawyer, Massachusetts Super Lawyers

2007

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

2006

Super Lawyer, Massachusetts Super Lawyers

2006

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

2005

Super Lawyer, Massachusetts Super Lawyers

2005

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

2004

Super Lawyer, Massachusetts Super Lawyers

2004

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

2003

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

2002

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

2001

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

2000

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

1999

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

1998

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

1997

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

1996

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

1995

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

1994

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

1993

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers in America

Work Experience

2015 - Present

Retired, Retired

1977 - Present

Partner, Sugarman and Sugarman, P. C.

Associations

1995 - Present

American College of Trial Lawyers

Fellow

1993 - Present

American Board of Trial Advocates

Advocate

1977 - Present

Massachusetts Bar Association

Member

1977 - Present

American Association for Justice

Member

1977 - Present

Massachusetts Academy of Trial Attorneys

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Sexual assault by school van driver

Settlement

Roofer suffered burns while attaching flashing to two family house

Settlement

Liquor server's liability

Settlement

Leibovich v. Antonellis, 410 Mass. 568 (1991)

Jury Verdict

Karlin v. Massachusetts Turnpike Auth., 399 Mass. 765 (1987)

Appeal

Industrial plastic roll-stand

Settlement

Hooper v. Davis-Standard Corp, et al, 482 F. Supp 2d 157 (2007)

Aleo vs. ToysRUs

$20.6 million

See More Legal Cases

Education

1975

Boston University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1972

Yale University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2012

Rotary Club Luncheon

The Importance of Personal Injury Law in the Business Community

Publications

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution