We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
1
Practice Area
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: New York
Acquired: 2009
No misconduct found
State: Massachusetts
Acquired: 2001
No misconduct found
12 Marshall Street, Boston, MA, 02108
251 W 30th Street, New York, NY, 10001
88 Client Reviews
Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews | 1 star
Posted by Serge | February 24, 2025 | Immigration
waste of time and money
consultation was non informative, political narratives brought into conversation leading to the idea not to move to US right now based on lawyer's subjective perception of new policies enforced by new administration. consultation was not worth my time nor money
Dear Serge, Thank you for sharing your feedback. I’m sorry to hear that you felt the consultation did not meet your expectations. My goal during every consultation is to provide clear, accurate, and up-to-date information regarding immigration matters. As you may have seen in the news, the current political climate and recent changes in immigration policies have significantly impacted the immigration landscape in the United States. It is important to be transparent about how these changes might affect each client’s individual immigration process. I understand if this was not the information you were seeking, but my job is to ensure that clients are well-informed in order to make the best decision for their unique situation. I wish you the best of luck in your quest to relocate to the United States. Greg Romanovsky
Posted by anonymous | February 23, 2023
ABSOLUTELY DISAPPOINTING! 0 stars!
I paid my consultation fees and the consultation was wonderful, I was late for consultation and they still answered my questions and told me to get back whenever I am ready to process and they will help to answer any additional questions! After I finished my school and I'm ready to come back they ...
Dear Ksenia, I am sorry we did not meet your expectations but, as I explained in my emails and the voicemail that I left for you, we cannot provide you with meaningful legal advice over email when we're not handling your case and don't have a file we can refer to. You had a consultation with me over 6 months ago and, while I did take notes during the consultation, I've since had hundreds of consultations, and I would need to get reacquainted with your situation in detail to provide you with the legal advice you're looking for. I understand you did not want to pay for another consultation, and I appreciate that, but you cannot reasonably expect the consultation fee of $150.00 that you paid last year to cover not just the consultation itself, but any future legal advice on your case. I am glad you thought the initial consultation was wonderful, though. And that you appreciated the fact that I still spent the time to talk to you after you missed your appointment. This is precisely because we genuinely care about helping people, and not just "making extra little money." I personally think this deserves a little more than "0 stars" (and that our inability to provide you with the free consultation you wanted does not justify purposefully hurting our online reputation), but you're certainly entitled to your opinion. We wish you the best of luck with your immigration case.
Posted by Anvar | December 05, 2020 | Hired Attorney | Immigration
The worst experience
I hired Greg Romanovsky back in 2016 and followed his recommendation, however, my family got deny during the interview overseas. He blamed trump administration the reason we got deny but as he represents himself the best lawyer I think he should learn each case and know the current immigration situat...
Dear Anvar, I regret that we were not able to bring your case to completion. As you and I discussed many times, the many changes implemented by the Trump administration did make the immigration process extremely difficult for a lot of people. Despite all of the changes, we continue to be successful in most cases (and this is what sets up apart from the competition), although sometimes we have to sue the government to make them follow the law. As you know, your family fell victim to the new policy related to the public charge requirement (restricting immigration for those who cannot show that they have enough financial support not to become a burden on the U.S. taxpayers). This policy change that had taken place right before your wife's visa interview was extremely unfortunate and unfair to you and your wife. We felt bad for you and continued to assist you well beyond the scope of what you had originally paid for. Since the embassy was still refusing to follow the law, the next logical step was to sue them in federal court. A federal court case of this nature requires a major effort (and special expertise that few immigration lawyers possess), so we could not do it for free for you. You did not want to go through the additional expense, and we understand that. I hope that the new administration will be able to quickly undo all of the harmful policy changes implemented by the previous one, and that your family will be able to join you in the United States very soon!
"I endorse this lawyer. Experienced and dedicated professional who is well-respected in legal field."
"An extremely talented and well respected attorney in the legal community, I wholeheartedly recommend him to anyone looking for a lawyer who knows the law and truly cares about protecting the rights of his clients and getting them the most favorable result possible."
Litigation lawyer
Immigration lawyer
Immigration lawyer
Immigration lawyer
Immigration lawyer
Family lawyer
2021
Super Lawyer in Immigration Law, Super Lawyers Magazine
2020
Super Lawyer in Immigration Law, Super Lawyers Magazine
2019
Super Lawyer in Immigration Law, Super Lawyers Magazine
2018
Super Lawyer in Immigration Law, Super Lawyers Magazine
2017
Super Lawyer (Immigration), Super Lawyers Magazine
2016
Super Lawyer (Immigration), Super Lawyers Magazine
2016
Best Immigration Lawyers in Boston, Expertise
2015
Super Lawyer (Immigration), Super Lawyers Magazine
2013
New England Super Lawyer (Immigration), Super Lawyers
2012
New England Rising Star, Super Lawyers
2011
New England Rising Star, Super Lawyers
2019 - Present
Immigration Court Liaison Committee Member, American Immigration Lawyers Association
2009 - Present
Partner, Romanovsky Law, LLP
2008 - Present
Owner, Romanovsky Law Offices
2005 - Present
Volunteer Attorney, City of Boston, Mayors Office of New Bostonians
2018 - 2019
Immediate Past Chapter Chair, American Immigration Lawyers Association
2017 - 2018
Chapter Chair, AILA New England, American Immigration Lawyers Association
2000 - 2007
Associate, Law Office of Boris Maiden
1999 - 1999
Student Attorney, Boston College Civil Litigation Clinic
2016 - Present
Federal Bar AssociationMember
2001 - Present
American Immigration Lawyers AssociationMember
2013 - 2019
American Immigration Lawyers Association (New England)Executive Board Member
2002 - 2013
American Immigration Lawyers AssociationChair of Litigation Committee, New England Chapter
Petition for review was granted, the Board of Immigration Appeals decision was vacated, and the matter was remanded to the agency.
The court granted the motion and awarded Attorney Romanovsky $80,121.81 in legal fees and costs.
The court ruled in Petitioner's favor and vacated the agency's decision.
The en banc court upheld the district court's grant of habeas corpus
The Circuit Court upheld our victory at the district court level
The court granted our Habeas Corpus petition
Supreme Court denied Petition for Writ of Certiorari
2000
Juris Doctor
1997
Bachelor's
N/A
2022
2022
2021
Removal and Litigation
2021
2020
Using Federal Litigation to Your Clients' Advantage
2020
Key Strategies for Successful Marriage-Based Interviews and How to Respond to Requests for Evidence and Notices of Intent to Deny
2018
Tired of Waiting? Time to file a mandamus action!
2017
2017
2017
2016
2016
2015
Mastering the Mechanics of a Removal Hearing II—Practical Trial Plan
2014
Complicated Naturalization Cases
2014
The Art of Getting Paid After a Federal Court Victory
2014
2013
Removal, Inadmissibility & Deportation Grounds
2013
Current Litigation Issues
2012
2012
2012
EAJA Fees in Immigration Cases
2018
2016
2015
2015
2014
2014
2012
2011
2005
Russian
Spanish
Romanian
Legal Answers
N-400 pending 6+ months after interview (Boston FO) – extended background review
13 Mar 2026
Partner's O1 rejected under 212(a)(3)(A)(ii)? How to proceed?
04 Dec 2024
Can someone please explain the response I received from USCIS on my I-751 waiver form?
10 Sep 2024