Legal Guides Answers & Advice Lawyer Search

Rene L Williams

6.2

Good

Experience
Professional Conduct

Find out more about the Avvo Rating

Client Rating

1 review
Former client? Write a review

No professional misconduct found.

E-mail Lawyer Share Lawyer's website Add to list

Overview

Practice Areas

70% Appeals
3 years, 50 cases (10 examples)
10% Contracts / Agreements
2 years, 5 cases
10% Constitutional
2 years, 20 cases

Show all areas of practice and cases

Fees & Payments

Fees

Fixed (Always)
Free Consultation (30 minutes)
Hourly ($100-$250/hour)
Pro Bono (5%)

Payment types

Cash, Check

Contact Information

Law Office of Rene Williams

1753 E. Broadway Road #101-528

Tempe, AZ 85282

480-200-3684
View map

E-mail this lawyer

Visit lawyer's website

About Me

Photos (0)

Videos (0)

About me: I offer research appellate services on a variety of criminal, civil andconstitutional issues. I accept disability cases byreferral only.

References

Client Reviews

Best Discrimination Lawyer

Posted by: anonymous, about 1 month ago. Flag as objectionable

Overall rating

Trustworthy

Responsive

Knowledgeable

Kept me informed

I recommend Rene Williams.
I used Rene 1-6 months ago.
Rene handled my Discrimination matter.
I have previously worked with no lawyers.

Client Review: The word is awesome!! I have had very nice experience. She listens to you, understands, gives enough time. She does her research thoroughly and... more

Endorsements

Endorse a fellow lawyer, get more visits to your profile

In addition to providing a simple way to express your gratitude to fellow lawyers, any time you add an endorsement to a peer's profile, a link to your profile will appear on it.

Endorse this lawyer

Résumé

Licenses

13 years since Rene L Williams was first licensed to practice law in AZ.

See license details Hide license details

We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.

Work Experience

Position	Duration
Deputy County Attorney at Office of the Maricopa County Attorney	1997–2003

Education

School	Major	Degree	Graduated
University of Nebraska, Lincoln	Law & Psychology	JD - Juris Doctor	1996

Associations

Position	Association Name	Duration
Member	American Bar Association Council of Appellate Lawyers	2008–present
Mentor	American Bar Association National Mentor Program for Law Students with Disabilities	2008–present

See all 3 association entries

Portfolio

Avvo Answers

Avvo Contribution:

conflict of interest

Any attorney in the state of AZ can take your case. They will be able to notify the Court of your... more

Cases

Title:: Katherine S. v. Foreman
Practice Area:: Appeals
Outcome:: unsucessful
Description:: A.R.S. § 8-235(B)(2), which allows a judge to order any person to do or refrain from doing anything harmful or detrimental to a delinquent child or...

Title:: In re Roy L.
Practice Area:: Appeals
Outcome:: successful
Description:: A police officer who learns from school security guard that a student across the street from the school has a gun may reasonably stop the student and...

Title:: In re Timothy M.
Practice Area:: Appeals
Outcome:: successful
Description:: A juvenile’s plea agreement may be revoked by any party prior to its acceptance by the juvenile court. Mere acceptance by one party is not binding....

Title:: In re Luis A. et al. v. Bayham-Lesselyoung et al.
Practice Area:: Appeals
Outcome:: partially successful
Description:: A traffic citation used to commence a juvenile court proceeding need not comport with the content requirements of Rule 4 of the Arizona Rules of...

Title:: In re Marxus B.
Practice Area:: Appeals
Outcome:: unsuccessful
Description:: A.R.S.§ 13-3111 is a special or local law in violation of article IV, part 2,section 19(7) of the Arizona Constitution.

Title:: In re Kyle M.
Practice Area:: Appeals
Outcome:: successful
Description:: A.R.S. section 13-1202(A)(1) does not require the State to prove a defendant or juvenile acted with “wrongful intent,” although the State must...

Title:: Arpaio v. Steinle
Practice Area:: Appeals
Outcome:: unsuccessful
Description:: A.R.S. §31-225 is clear and unambiguous, we give effect to that language and apply it without using other means of statutory construction, unless...

Title:: In re Melissa K.
Practice Area:: Appeals
Outcome:: unsuccessful
Description:: A deviation in juvenile sentencing for committal to the Juvenile Department of Corrections is only justifiable if no other alternative to commitment...

Title:: In re Dayvid S.
Practice Area:: Appeals
Outcome:: successful
Description:: To find a juvenile delinquent of an offense, the offense must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

Title:: In re Moises L.
Practice Area:: Government
Outcome:: successful
Description:: Statute was not void because it was sufficiently definite to provide notice to Arizona drivers that they must carry evidence of identity in a form...

Title:: In re Sheree M.
Practice Area:: Appeals
Outcome:: successful
Description:: The juvenile court does not have the statutory authority to impose juvenile intensive probation (JIPS) on an incorrigible juvenile,

See additional cases Hide additional cases

See all cases