9.4
| Experience | |
| Industry Recognition | |
| Professional Conduct |
Contributor level 8
Practice Areas |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fees and Payment Types |
Payment types
Cash, Check, Credit Card
|
||||
Contact Information |
|
||||
Languages Spoken |
|
||||
About MePhotos (0)Videos (1) |
J. Steven (Steve) Anderson has practiced in the area of Family Law and Litigation since 1983. He is a native of Memphis, Tennessee. He founded the J. Steven... more View all photos and/or videos |
Client Reviews |
Average Client RatingCurrent or former client? Write a review
“Highly Recommended”Posted by: Jennifer, about 2 years ago.
Client Review:
I have hired Mr. Anderson twice to help me resolve child support issues. He is very knowledgeable and always kept me informed. In the courtroom, he...
more
Flag
“Integrity & Experience”Posted by: Tracey, about 2 years ago.
Client Review:
I hired Mr. Anderson to handle my divorce (with children) recently. During my initial consultation, I was immediately struck by his calm and kind...
more
Flag
|
|---|---|
Peer Endorsements |
 I've known Steve for years and refer all domestic relations matters to him. Endorsement from lawyer: Michael Parham , Germantown (TN), Over 1 year ago I endorse this lawyer. Mr. Anderson is an experienced family law advocate and is respected in the mid south for both his knowledge of family law and... more Endorsement from lawyer: Justin Thomas , Memphis (TN), Almost 2 years ago |
License |
30 years since John Steven Anderson was first licensed to practice law.
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Work Experience |
|
||||||||||||
Education |
|
||||||||||||
Awards |
|
||||||||||||
Associations |
|
Contribution |
Contributor Level 8
|
||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases |
Outcome: Mr. Anderson successfully argued that the requirements of Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-2-304(b)(2) had not been met and that Appellant is the child's biological and legal father. The Appellate Court reversed the ruling of the trial court and remanded.
Outcome: The Tennessee Court of Appeals affirmed and upheld the trial court's ruling that Mr. Anderson's client would not have to pay alimony despite his very high income.
Outcome: Mr. Anderson successfully argued to the Court of Appeals for reversal of the trial court's ruling that the Premarital Agreement signed by the his client in 1976 was valid and enforcable.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Publications |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Speaking Engagements |
|
