Stephen James Buividas

On an incident of property damage in excess of $70,000.00 July 2103, Plaintiff hired Atty in 2013 to handle a slam dunk matter. Matter has langished many times due to his other interests, now in litigation for the third year. Atty is a very nice man, who may be able to handle very minor matters o...f traffic court, etc, but when it comes to the middle or the big leagues, he simply does not have the resources and perhaps the ability to win. This is a one man operation. Atty knows people, but has not been effective when by comparison the end result is incrediable lapse in timing to court schedules, poor choice of wording in court documents, and several times difficult in speaking before a Judge. Three motions have come before the court. Each motion is lost to the detriment of the Plaintiff either by the attorney failing to meet a court deadline, failing to adequitly word the document to obtain a favorable ruling, or simply being placed against the defense attorney of superior ability. As the client, the result is lost income, a possibility of losing real estate due to the incrediable length of justice being delayed, lost sleep, and lost peace of mind, This client has contacted other attornies to handle the matter for a win, but other attornies won't take over the case because it has become so screwed up. This client is very dissappointed by the lack of reasonable expectations in conducting this civil lawsuit. Atty does not return phone calls nor does he make calls to this cleint. 93 days passed from the time a request was made for a phone conversation. Several shorter but similiar periods have passed over the last 2 years from the time one conversation occured to another.