James Joseph Wimsatt

Mr. Wimsatt brings dignified competence combined with intelligence and compassion to his work on behalf of his clients. His attention to detail combined with his focus on optimal result lay the groundwork for impressive success with respect to outcome. James exemplifies a professional grounded in et...hics and he is clearly motivated by his passionate commitment to upholding the law as he tools his craft through application of his legal expertise. Mr. Wimsatt was absolutely brilliant with regard to my case and our outcome far surpassed all anticipated results.

I am currently in the midst of a very very contentious divorce and Jim has been the voice of reason many many times . I honestly feel as if he truly cares about me and my children not only for the case, which he is extremely knowledgeable nd extremely professional, but there's a personal side to hi...m so you don't just feel like attorney-client, you feel as if he actually cares about not only yourself but you're entire family.. that being said he will most definitely tell you what you need to hear not what you want to hear and I think that is extremely important when going through this. I would recommend him highly to anybody he is extremely professional and personal and that's hard to find in this day and age. i would highly recommend Jim and his team to anyone in need of an attorney that truely understands what you are going through.

My previous attorney was doing a very poor job of representing me to collect unpaid child support (severe lack of communication, 1 invoice over 2 years, some paperwork not filed, frequent change of support personnel, etc.). Jim took over on short notice (a few months before court date) and quickly go...t up to speed. He knew what was fair and legal: I was owed child support and the ex admitted it in his own writing, but simply chose to stop paying. He resolved to settle for nothing less. Because the previous attorney failed to file the financial disclosure with the court, and there was no proof of assets to liquefy; all the GM could do was reinstate wage garnishment as previously ordered. Jim did a fine job of showing the debtor did nothing to fulfill his responsibilities by asking direct questions of him in front of the GM.