Errol Lamont Cook

MR. COOK CANNOT BE TRUSTED EITHER. HE ALSO HELPS THE STATE DERAIL THE LAGAL DEFENSE OF DEFENDANTS WHEN THE POLICE OR STATE EMPLOYEES GOT CRIMES OF THEIR OWN TO COVER UP. MR. COOK HELPED THE STATE WITH THE DERAILING OF MY LEGAL DEFENSE AS WELL INSIDE DEPARTMENT 14 IN COMPTON COURTHOUSE ON APRIL 13, 20...26. WHERE HE WAS APPOINTED AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL FOR ATTORNEY DANIEL IGNACE KAPELOVITZ WHO FIRST HELPED DERAILED MY LEGAL DEFENSE BACK ON APRIL 1, 2025 I LEFT A REVIEW ABOUT HIS PART IN THIS ALREADY. MR. COOK REFUSED TO SUBMIT A CHP EVIDENCE COLLECTION SHEET INTO THE RECORD WHICH I GOT WITH THE DISCOVERY DURING SELF REPRESENTATION THAT WOULD HAVE PROVEN THE EXISTENCE & ILLEGAL SUPPRESSION FOR OVER 3 YEARS AND A HALF SINCE JANUARY 3RD 2023 UNTIL PRESENT DAY BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, OF THE SECURITY VIDEO FROM THE COMMERCIAL DMV IN GARDENA CALIFORNIA WHERE I WAS ATTACKED BY THE 4 CHP OFFICERS WITH THEIR TASERS. VIDEO THAT WAS COLLECTED BY THE 4 CHP OFFICERS THAT ATTACKED ME INSIDE THE COMMERCIAL DMV INOUYE, GUERRA, HERNANDEZ, & CHEAK & THEN LABELED AS " VIDEO OF USED OF FORCED" ON THE EVIDENCE COLLECTION SHEET BY THEM. BUT TO COVER UP THEIR POLICE BRUTALITY.THEY FALSELY CLAIMED THE VIDEO DIDN'T CONVINIENTLY FOR THEM EXIST WHICH MEANS THEY ILLEGALLY HID OR DESTROYED THE SECURITY VIDEO FROM THE COMMERCIAL DMV IN GARDENA CALIFORNIA AFTER THEY ATTACKED ME & SHOT ME IN THE BACK 2 TIMES WITH A TASER WITHOUT A NECESSARY OR LEGAL JUSTIFIABLE REASON TO DO SO. THE EVIDENCE COLLECTION SHEET WOULD HAVE PROVEN THE EXISTENCE, ILLEGAL SUPPRESSION & POSSIBLE ILLEGAL DESTRUCTION OF THE SECURITY FOOTAGE WHICH COULD IN TURN HAVE HELPED ME PROVE MY INNOCENCE IN COURT AND EXONARATE ME OF THE FALSE ASSAULT CHARGES AGAINST ME BY THE 4 CHP OFFICERS WHO ASSAULTED ME INSTEAD WITH THEIR TASER. MR. COOK THEN ILLEGALLY & FORCEDFULLY OVER MY LEGAL OBJECTIONS FOR THE CASE TO NOT MOVE FORWARD WITHOUT FIRST SUBMITTING INTO THE RECORD THE EVIDENCE COLLECTION SHEET PROVING THE EXISTENCE OF THE SECURITY VIDEO FROM THE DMV AND WITHOUT ME FIRST RECEIVING THAT VIDEO TO PROVE MY INNOCENCE IN COURT. WENT AHEAD OVERRODE MY LEGAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND FLAT OUT REFUSED TO SUBMIT THE EVIDENCE COLLECTION SHEET INTO THE RECORD IN COURT & THEN HELPED JUDGE EMILY GARCIA UHRIG AND DISTRICT ATTORNEY MANDY KATZ SET UP THE COURT DATE THAT WAS MORE CONVINIENT FOR THEM AND THEIR FABRICATED CASE AGAINST ME FOR A COURT DATE OF MAY 11 2026 THAT I DIDN'T APPROVE OR AGREE UPON. SO THEY COULD BE ABLE TO COORDINATE AND FIGURED A WAY TO EXPLAIN AWAY MY EVIDENCE COLLECTION SHEET PROVING THE EXISTENCE OF THE MISSING SECURITY FOOTAGE FROM THE COMMERCIAL DMV IN GARDENA CALIFORNIA WHERE I WAS ATTACKED AND SHOT IN THE BACK WITH A TASER BY THOSE 4 CHP OFFICERS MENTIONED ABOVE. WHICH ENABLE THEM TO KEEP THE CASE OPENED FOR LONGER EVEN THOUGH I HAD PHYSICAL EVIDENCE PROVING THE EXISTENCE OF EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE SHEET THAT COULD HAVE EXONARATED ME OF THE FALSE CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST ME. BECAUSE OF THE CONSTANT DERAILING I WAS ALSO FORCED TO SUBMIT FORMAL COMPLAINTS WITH THE CALIFORNIA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION AGAINST MR. DANIEL IGNACE KAPELOVITZ, MR. ERROL LAMONT COOK & 2 OTHER ATTORNEYS NOT MENTIONED HERE THAT WERE ALSO INVOLVED IN THE SAME CASE AND DERAILING OF MY LEGAL DEFENSE IN 4 DIFFERENT WAYS OVER THE COURSE OF THOSE 3 & A HALF YEARS. FROM JANUARY 3RD UNTIL PRESENT DAY.