No Photo

Christine M Powell

Licensed for 40 years

Elder law Lawyer
Practice Areas: Elder Law, Health Care
Claim Profile

Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.

About Christine

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Arizona for 40 years

State: Arizona

Acquired: 1985

Active

No misconduct found

Location

No contact information is available for this lawyer

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Christine M Powell's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.7 /5.0

6 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (6) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Ethics & Professional Responsibility

Posted by anonymous | May 12, 2013 | Ethics & Professional Responsibility

HORRIBLE UNETHICAL ATTORNEY AVOID AT ALL COSTS

I, (a mother of three and Petitioner in a Maricopa County Superior Court Family Law Custody Case) had to go to the hospital for anxiety. While in the hospital, I was sued for custody over my middle child by her father (the respondent in the case; an estranged dead-beat dad owing over $20,000.00 in c...hild support and who is a known past/present abuser of the petitioner and child in the family court case, all of which there is evidence of). The judge in the case, Judge Teresa Sanders, has been knowingly violating Rule 10 of Arizona State Family Law, and the Best Interest Attorney (Christine Powell of Chandler Arizona) in the case has been legally advising the respondent in the case (a conflict of interest and violation of Arizona State Bar Ethics) as well as being complicit in violating Rule 10 of Family Law, all of which there is evidence of. In addition, they have taken the minor child in the case and given her to her KNOWN abusive/estranged father (despite evidence proving his abuse and despite his absence from the child's entire life (aside from a few visits that resulted in the known abuse), all based on the rumors, gossip, and lies (also evidence proving this) of a single witness, who has sold the corrupt Judge Sanders on the Petitioner's spirituality being a mental illness (despite witness testimony proving otherwise), and who sold the Petitioner's anxiety and depression as being schizophrenia (despite doctors statements and witness testimony proving otherwise) even though the witness is no expert, has no evidence, and has motive to be discredited as a witness in the case. The Judge Teresa Sanders in the case has ordered supervised visitation of the Petitioner with the minor child, without basis for doing so other than the defaming rumors spread by a single witness. As a result a happy child has been torn from a loving and healthy home, sent to live with her abuser, and whose relationships with her siblings and mother (the Petitioner) have been terminated. The Respondent refuses to contact the Parenting Skills Program in order to allow the Petitioner to see the child in the case. The siblings and child in the case have been severely emotionally wounded and detrimentally affected by this JudgeSanders's violations of the Arizona State Family Law Rules of Procedure, violations of the minor child's peace and happiness, violations by the Best Interest Attorney in the case, violations of the Petitioner's rights as a parent, violations of the Petitioner's First Amendment Rights to practice her spirituality, and the Petitioner's "mental health issues" (Judge Teresa Sander's answer to why this is happening) have been treated as the sole basis for removal of the child from the only home the child has known her entire life. This is without any evidence proving any abuse or neglect, and although CPS was involved in the case, the Judge Teresa Sanders's dismissed CPS because they found the claims against the Petitioner were unsubstantiated. Please get this corrupt Judge Teresa Sanders removed from her appointment and the corrupt Best Interests Attorney Christine Powell investigated by the Arizona State Bar.

See All Client Reviews

Christine M Powell's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Christine

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Education

1984

California Western School of Law

JD

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution