William Philip Torngren

William Philip Torngren

5.0
Rating: 9.2

Licensed for 52 years

Lawyer at Sacramento, CA

7485 Rush River Drive, No. 710-313, Sacramento, CA

This attorney is currently not accepting new clients.
Reason: Government Attorney

About William

Biography

Practice Areas

This attorney has not specified their practice areas.

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 52 years

State: California

Acquired: 1973

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

Former Law Offices of William P Torngren

7485 Rush River Drive, No. 710-313, Sacramento, CA

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

William Philip Torngren's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

4 Client Reviews

5 star (4)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (0)

Posted by anonymous | January 27, 2009

Representing Joe and Ladeen

We found William Torngren to be very professional in every way. He demonstrated excellent knowledge and expertise in the handling of the different phases in our case. He explained the legal processes of our case, our options and possibilities, in terms that could be understood by the common person.... We were kept informed of the correspondence with other attorneys and involved in all decision making. He was always very accessible by telephone and e-mail. Appointments were made and kept in a timely fashion. My wife and I are very happy with the representation provided by William Torngren and heartily recommend him.

Posted by anonymous | January 22, 2009

Former Client and Lawyer

They say the highest compliment for a lawyer is to be hired by another lawyer. As a lawyer with some 36 years experience, I was very happy with Mr. Torngren's representation and would have no reservations about hiring him again.

Posted by anonymous | January 22, 2009

Reliable and Trustworthy

For over twenty years, Bill has always been the first person I go for business related legal advice or referrels. He never steers me wrong and his fees are very fair.

Posted by anonymous | January 21, 2009

Bill Torngren is the best

Bill was instrumental in helping me overcome a personal matter that had mushroomed into a legal one with concise precision and no spinning wheels.

See All Client Reviews

William Philip Torngren's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse William
Scot David Bernstein headshot
Scot Bernstein

Securities and investment fraud lawyer | Sep 02

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"William Torngren is extremely smart, principled, diligent and knowledgeable. I have co-counseled numerous cases with him, including both securities arbitrations and employment class actions. Mr. Torngren is creative, amenable to “outside-the-box” approaches, and capable of thinking several steps ahead. He is skilled in the logistics of handling large cases, and is more able than most to obtain cooperation from opposing counsel."

Scott Allen Miller headshot
Scott Miller

Employment and labor lawyer | Mar 31

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I first met Bill Torngren, as he was plaintiff's counsel in a class action lawsuit that I was also prosecuting. I found Bill to be aggressive, extremely bright, and has excellent attention to detail. Presently, I am co-venturing several other matters with Bill. So, this being said, I highly recommend Bill."

Elaine Anne Musser headshot
Elaine Musser

Securities and investment fraud lawyer | Feb 10

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Willaim Torngren is a credit to his profession. Not only is he an excellent attorney in his chosen field, but he also has donated his time free of charge to train volunteer attorneys in the intricacies of investment fraud."

Lisa Kaye Hightower headshot
Lisa Hightower

Business lawyer | Jan 13

Relationship: Worked for lawyer

"I endorse this lawyer's work. Extremely smart, hard-working, ethical. One of the best legal writers around."

View All Endorsements
Scott Allen Miller headshot
Scott Miller

Employment and labor lawyer

Experience

Rating:  9.2 (Superb)

Honors

2011

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

1973

Order of the Coif, Hastings College of the Law

1973

Thurston Honor Society, Hastings College of the Law

Work Experience

2012 - Present

Deputy Attorney General, The California Department Of Justice

1994 - 2012

Principal, Law Offices of William P. Torngren

1987 - 1994

Partner/Shareholder, Bartel Eng Miller & Torngren

1982 - 1987

Shareholder, Bolling, Walter & Gawthrop

1978 - 1982

Partner, Van Camp & Johnson

1976 - 1978

Associate, Law Offices of Arthur M. Traugh

1973 - 1976

Associate, Pillsbury Madison & Sutro

Associations

1988 - Present

American Bar Association

Member

1973 - Present

State Bar of California

Member

2006 - 2008

Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association

Amicus Committee

1995 - 2010

Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association

Member

1982 - 2005

Sacramento County Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Mommi v. Prudential Securities

Settled Favorably

Marcum v. Northeast Securities, Inc.

Award for Claimant more than $198,500

Hoyer v. Farmer

Judgment for plaintiff more than $837,000

Aronis, et al. v. Woodbury Financial Services, Inc., et al.

Award Claimants (>$578,000) + Settlement

Teagarden v. McCarn's Allstate Finance, Inc., et al.

Judgment for more than $1.5 million

Capps and Action Machine v. Becker

Judgment for Plaintiffs (>$1.4 million)

See More Legal Cases

Education

1973

University of California, Hastings College of the Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1966

University of California

BS - Bachelor of Science

Speaking Engagements

2006

Mid-Year Meeting

Products Claims and Sales Practice Claims

2006

Legal Education

Investment Fraud and Remedies

2006

Annual Meeting

Securities Professional and Investor Advisor Liability Insurance

2005

Mid-Year Meeting

Securities Professional Insurance Issues

2003

PLUS Days

Breach of Fiduciary Duty - A Plaintiff's Perspective

2002

Continuing Legal Education

Federal Civil Litigation

2001

Four Keys Education Program

Problems with Investment Professionals

2001

Continuing Legal Education

Federal Civil Litigation

1999

Continuing Legal Education

Federal Civil Litigation

1998

Lecture Series

Securities Fraud and Remedies

1998

Continuing Legal Education

Federal Civil Litigation

1997

Monthly Meeting

Securities Problems - Symptoms and Remedies

1997

Continuing Legal Education

Securities Fraud and Remedies

1994

Continuing Legal Education

Federal Civil Litigation

1994

Annual Meeting

Investment Fraud and Remedies

1993

Continuing Legal Education

Federal Practice Institute

1992

Continuing Legal Education

Federal Practice Institute

1988

Short Selling Seminar

Remedies in Short Selling Schemes

Publications

1972

Hastings Law Journal Public Utility Relocation
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution