Adam V. Floyd

Adam V. Floyd's Legal Cases (23)

Patent infringement Lawyer

Practice Areas: Patent Infringement, Intellectual Property ... +2 more

View Profile
View Profile
Patent infringement

Auto Wax v. Mark V, N.D. Tex.

N/A

OUTCOME: Favorable jury verdict across the board

Represented Auto Wax in a case pertaining to auto body detailing clay. The case involved claims of patent, trademark, and copyright infringement.

Patent infringement

Dynacore v. Dell Computers, et al., S.D.N.Y.

N/A

OUTCOME: Won on summary judgement which was affirmed by the Federal Circuit

Represented Dell in a case pertaining to Fast Ethernet (i.e., IEEE 802.3u) standard.

Patent infringement

Marhoefer v. Advanced Micro Devices, E.D. Va.

N/A

OUTCOME: Case settled favorably

Represented AMD in a case pertaining to microprocessor memory management.

Copyright infringement

Winternals v. Best Buy, W.D. Tex.

N/A

OUTCOME: Case settled favorably early on

Represented Winternals in a copyright infringement suit.

Patent infringement

Vardon Golf v. Golfsmith, N.D. Ill.

N/A

OUTCOME: Sucessfully invalidated the patent on summary judgement which was affirmed by the Federal Circuit

Represented Golfsmith in a case pertaining to golf clubs.

Patent infringement

Riles v. Shell Oil Co., S.D. Tex.

N/A

OUTCOME: Sucessfully reversed the damages and case settled favorably

Represented Shell on appeal after they lost at trial. The technology pertained to off-shore oil rigs.

Patent infringement

3M v. M/A Com, W.D. Tex.

N/A

OUTCOME: Case settled favorably

Represented 3M in a case pertaining to splice housings for fiber optic telephone lines.

Patent infringement

Dynamic Hosting Co. v. Canon USA, Inc., E.D. Tex.

N/A

OUTCOME: Case settled favorably

Represented Canon in a case pertaining to cloud-based computer printers.

Patent infringement

911 Notify, LLC v. Clandestine Development, LLC, et. al., D. Del.

N/A

OUTCOME: Plaintiff voluntariliy dismissed us after we filed a summary judgement motion of invalidity

Represented Clandestine in a case pertaining to emergency contact systems.

Patent infringement

Baxter Medical v. COBE BCT, N.D. Ill.

N/A

OUTCOME: Avoided all 8 patents at summary judgment stage which was affirmed by the Federal Circuit

Represented COBE in a case pertaining to blood centrifuge technology.

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
Learn More About the Avvo Rating