Adam V. Floyd

Adam V. Floyd

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 31 years

Patent infringement Lawyer Practice Areas: Patent Infringement, Intellectual Property, Arbitration, Gun Law

About Adam

Biography

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Patent Infringement 50%

32 years | 250 cases

50%
Intellectual Property 25%

32 years | 50 cases

25%
Arbitration 20%

30 years | 25 cases

20%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 650-650 per hour

Contingency

33%-50%


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Colorado for 11 years

State: Colorado

Acquired: 2014

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Texas for 31 years

State: Texas

Acquired: 1994

Eligible to Practice in Texas

No misconduct found

Location

No contact information is available for this lawyer

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Adam V. Floyd's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Adam V. Floyd's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Adam
Kent Jeffrey Cooper headshot
Kent Cooper

Intellectual property lawyer | Aug 09

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. While I was in-house counsel for Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Adam represented AMD in a patent lawsuit against Oki Semiconductor. During this lawsuit I worked closely with Adam and found him to be an outstanding attorney. I highly recommend him to any firm looking for outside counsel for patent dispute matters."

View All Endorsements
Michael Joseph Smith headshot
Michael Smith

Litigation lawyer

Kent Jeffrey Cooper headshot
Kent Cooper

Intellectual property lawyer

Brad Jon Hattenbach headshot
Brad Hattenbach

Intellectual property lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2015

Featured as a top-rated lawyer in IP, American Lawyer

2012

Super Lawyer, Texas Monthly Magazine

2011

Super Lawyer, Texas Monthly Magazine

2011

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers

2010

Super Lawyer, Texas Monthly Magazine

2009

Super Lawyer, Texas Monthly Magazine

2008

America's Leading Lawyers, Chambers USA

2007

America's Leading Lawyers, Chambers USA

2006

America's Leading Lawyers, Chambers USA

2005

America's Leading Lawyers, Chambers USA

2004

Rising Star, Texas Monthly Magazine

Work Experience

2014 - 2018

Partner, Dorsey & Whitney, LLP

2012 - 2014

Adminstrative Law Judge, Patent Trial and Appeal Board

2009 - 2012

Partner, F&B, LLP

1998 - 2009

Partner, Vinson & Elkins

1994 - 1998

Associate, Arnold White & Durkee

1983 - 1987

Sergeant, United States Air Force (Active Duty)

Associations

2014 - Present

Colorado Bar Association

Admitted

2004 - Present

W.D. of Wisconsin

Admitted

2004 - Present

N.D. of Texas

Admitted

2001 - Present

S.D. of Texas

Admitted

1998 - Present

N.D. of Illinois

Admitted

1998 - Present

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Admitted

1997 - Present

E.D. of Texas

Admitted

1996 - Present

D. of Colorado

Admitted

1995 - Present

United States Patent and Trademark Office

Admitted

1994 - Present

State Bar of Texas

Admitted

1994 - Present

W.D. of Texas

Admitted

Sample of Legal Cases

Baxter Medical v. COBE BCT, N.D. Ill.

Avoided all 8 patents at summary judgment stage which was affirmed by the Federal Circuit

Dynamic Hosting Co. v. Canon USA, Inc., E.D. Tex.

Case settled favorably

911 Notify, LLC v. Clandestine Development, LLC, et. al., D. Del.

Plaintiff voluntariliy dismissed us after we filed a summary judgement motion of invalidity

3M v. M/A Com, W.D. Tex.

Case settled favorably

Chef America v. Pillsbury. et al.

Case settled favorably

Dow Chemical Co. v. Sumitomo Chemical Co., E.D. Mich.

Case settled favorably on courthouse steps

Auto Wax v. Mark V, N.D. Tex.

Favorable jury verdict across the board

Riles v. Shell Oil Co., S.D. Tex.

Sucessfully reversed the damages and case settled favorably

Vardon Golf v. Golfsmith, N.D. Ill.

Sucessfully invalidated the patent on summary judgement which was affirmed by the Federal Circuit

Winternals v. Best Buy, W.D. Tex.

Case settled favorably early on

Marhoefer v. Advanced Micro Devices, E.D. Va.

Case settled favorably

Dynacore v. Dell Computers, et al., S.D.N.Y.

Won on summary judgement which was affirmed by the Federal Circuit

Joao Control and Monitoring Systems LLC v. Xanboo, Inc., et al., C.D. Cal.

Settled favorably

Massachusetts Institute of Technology v. Dell Computers, et al., E.D. Tex.

Won case on summary judgement which was affirmed by the Federal Circuit

Innovative Truck Storage v. Chevrolet, Ford, et al., E.D. Tex.

Case settled favorably for client

Advanced Micro Devices v. OKI, N.D. Cal.

Sucessfully defeated OKI's patents on summary judgment. Case settled favorably on the courthouse steps.

Arthur A. Collins, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone, N.D. Tex.

Won case on summary judgment with an affirmance on appeal

DUSA v. River’s Edge, D.N.J.

Sucessful in obtaining preliminary injunction and case settled favorably

Shearing-Plough v. Fruit of the Earth, N.D. Tex.

Won preliminary injunction hearing and case settled favorably.

Siliconix v. ON Semiconductor, arbitration Ariz.

Won case at trial

Freyburger LLC v. Microsoft, W.D. Wis.

Settled favorably for client

Shared Memory Graphics LLC v. Samsung, Nintendo, et al., N.D. Cal.

Obtained a favorable settlement for the client.

Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc. v. AT&T, C.D. Ga.

Setteled favorably

See More Legal Cases

Education

1994

Harvard University Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1991

Texas A&M University

BS - Bachelor of Science

Speaking Engagements

2015

IP Summit

"Monetization for Operating Companies in a Post AIA World"

2015

Corporate Counsel Symposium

Haven't Got Time for the Pain: Resolving IP Rights Without Damage

2015

American Inns of Court

•“TAB Forum Insight: A Conversation with TTAB and PTAB Judges”

Publications

2009

O'Connor's Federal Intellectual Property Codes Plus Book

2008

O'Connor's Federal Intellectual Property Codes Plus Book

2007

O'Connor's Federal Intellectual Property Codes Plus Book

2006

O'Connor's Federal Intellectual Property Codes Plus Book

2005

O'Connor's Federal Intellectual Property Codes Plus Book

1994

Legal Research Guide to Mechanical Patent Litigation Book

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution