M.D.R. v. IKEA Holdings U.S.
Jul 25, 2025OUTCOME: Excess of $5M case settled for less than $1.3M. Client ecstatic and overjoyed, conceding that it was a very high exposure/catastrophic claim.
San Francisco, CA
Litigation Lawyer at San Francisco, CA
Practice Areas: Litigation
OUTCOME: Excess of $5M case settled for less than $1.3M. Client ecstatic and overjoyed, conceding that it was a very high exposure/catastrophic claim.
OUTCOME: WCAB Agreed with Defendants in Total, and granted Defendants' "Petition to Declare Applicant, J.A.A.N., a vexatious litigant per 8 CCR Section 10421 and sanctions of L.C. 5813." Client satisfied.
OUTCOME: Case in Chief settled for nominal sum AOE/COE disputed. Lien of $127,954.00 from Anthem Blue Cross settled for $2,900.00. Lien of EDD of $42,000.00 settled for $2,300.00. Client Extremely Happy.
OUTCOME: Lien of $279,651.00 from Kaiser Permanente settled for $1,000. Client Extremely Happy.
OUTCOME: Defense Verdict: Take Nothing. Client extremely happy at outcome.
OUTCOME: Cal OSHA Matter Resolved in Favor of Employer. Client Extremely Happy.
OUTCOME: Lien of $55,147.67 settled for $1,000. Client Extremely Happy.
OUTCOME: Co-defendant dismissed client. Simple communication with opposing counsel alerted opposing counsel to erroneous joinder. Client Satisfied.
OUTCOME: California DLSE Labor Commissioner cited client for $203,247.13 for purported violation of Labor Code Sections 3700, 3710.1, and 3722. On day of Appeal/Trial Hearing, Labor Commissioner dismissed citation on the record without trial testimony.
OUTCOME: A County Health Inspector was intimidating restaurant client with multiple unreasonable regulatory requests. A simple cease and desist communication to the County Inspector solved all problems. Client Happy.