Heather Elizabeth Forrler

Heather Elizabeth Forrler

also known as Compass Legal Services, P.S.

4.3
Rating: 6.8

Licensed for 23 years

Family Lawyer at Silverdale, WA
Practice Areas: Family, Divorce & Separation, Estate Planning, Business

9481 Bayshore Drive NW, Suite 202, Silverdale, WA

About Heather

Biography

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Divorce and Separation 40%

19 years | 700 cases

40%
Family 40%

19 years | 600 cases

40%
Estate Planning 15%

19 years | 200 cases

15%
Business 5%

19 years | 150 cases

5%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 275-300 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 23 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 2002

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Compass Legal Services, P.S.

9481 Bayshore Drive NW, Suite 202, Silverdale, WA, 98383

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Heather Elizabeth Forrler's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.3 /5.0

11 Client Reviews

Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews | Communication Style

Posted by Jeff | December 16, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Uncontested Divorce

Highly Contested Divorce!

I originally contacted Heather about doing an uncontested divorce. This quickly turned into a 2 1/2 year contested nightmare! Heather, was with me every step of the way, always available for consultation, advice and shoulder crying. She was very reasonable with her billing time and cost. She was a...lso good at weighing the pros and cons as to whether we should settle or go to trial. The only thing I would suggest is that she be more aggressive, she is almost too nice for this type of conflict.

Posted by anonymous | September 30, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Divorce & Separation

Terrible Attorney - Utterly incompetent

Ms. Forrler could not have handled my case any less professionally. She failed in many regards, and my case was not particularly complicated. Her failures caused me to hire a new attorney solely to address the egregious damages she caused to me and my children throughout the legal process. I relied ...on her for legal advice and representation and was accurate and timely in my communications with her at all times. However, Ms. Forrler made tremendous and inexcusable errors in my case. She forwarded my very confidential email and information sent exclusively to her - directly to the opposing counsel in its entirety without my consent. She failed to be a conscious -- never-mind effective, representative in any settlement negotiations. This was in part because she failed to conduct the most necessary inquiry into the facts of my case which ultimately resulted in major losses to me. She attempted to postpone every hearing in my case because she was not prepared, or ill. She advised me incorrectly with regard to the state laws, when I asked important questions. She was utterly incompetent and unprepared at trial, which caused me to discontinue it. She allowed me to enter a settlement meeting without discussing any necessary provisions with me, and without notifying me that a transcript would be taken or there was any final or binding legal process taking place. A non-lawyer would not have prior knowledge of legal processes. Her missteps caused major errors in all of my legal proceedings. She "forgot" to notify me of the date of my very, very important final decree hearing and subsequently forgot to prepare with me in the weeks leading up to it, resulting in a final decree that I disagree with. I did not even know it was on the court calendar. She then agreed to major provisions with opposing counsel against my consent or without any notification to me at that hearing, because I was not present. The series of events is very shocking. Ms. Forrler had no knowledge of very necessary preparation and provisions to consider in a dissolution agreement, so she was unable to counsel me to any adequate degree. In addition, her fees were misrepresented, inflated to a large degree and highly unreasonable, for which I complained. She kept the balance of a requested advance payment for four anticipated days of trial, when there was only one. I certainly don't think she should profit from the damaging effects of her representation against me. I feel that through her incompetencies, she actually worked for opposing counsel and not for me. Upon firing her for all of these inexcusable acts, and after asking her what I could possibly do to address the disagreements I had with the "final" document in the court, she failed to notify me that I had the right to an appeal within a certain timeframe, which I did not know. You are very well-advised to choose another attorney. There are several good ones in the same area. As I said, I cannot imagine how my case could have been handled any worse.

Posted by anonymous | July 29, 2015 | Alimony

lacks abilty to work for the clients needs!

Ms. Forrler was unable/unwilling to help me! Even after taking a retainer, discussing the case,, her skills and my needs.....EPIC failure when it came to being in Court! She failed to provide me court documents in a reasonable & timely manner (I received than 48 before court), did not send me the p...leadings associated with the hearing until AFTER the court date passed. She never attempted to introduce new evidence that could have helped stop a contempt charge and reduction on my maintenance. She did not bring forth my financial situation that I was already living on only $31 a month (a declaration was made) but she did not attempt to help me by raising my financial distress prior to court, at the court hearing and is now far worse situation I am forced into. She is unwilling to be proactive with or for a client. I would warn people to not consult with her, even for uncontested matters. She lacks ability to work for the clients needs. She spent more time talking to opposing counsel than she did with me that day, and the Sat just before combined. My concerns seemed to be unimportant and left unaddressed after she was paid the retainer, much to my detriment in the end.

Heather Forrler

Replied last July 29, 2015

Critical feedback is greatly appreciated as an opportunity for me to examine the policies and procedures of the legal services I provide as part of my practice. I strive to promptly identify and rectify any errors in my processes and practice of the law. No one wants to be involved in legal proceedings, and when it is necessary, everyone hopes for the outcome most favorable for themselves. As an attorney I strive to achieve the most favorable possible outcome for each of my clients. My responsibility is to know the law regarding the issues at hand; the parameters which control what can and cannot be presented concerning the issues at hand; and to practice the most proactive, persuasive and ethical legal services. I must follow specific procedures for each court action and each case. All these must be adhered to exactly as they relate to the very precise services I agree to provide my clients in order to resolve their legal matters. With over a decade of experience as a practicing attorney, I am very much aware of those areas of the law for which I am best suited to serve my clients and most likely to achieve an outcome most favorable to them. For this reason I make very clear the specific matters I am able to represent them in. I make every effort to communicate very clearly and precisely the specific services I am, and am not, providing. Fees for these services are collected responsibly, and at a rate that affords my clients the best possible resources and ample time to prepare their case. Ultimately, the burden of deciding the outcome of a legal matter lies with the presiding judge, and though I may believe passionately the righteousness of my clients, the law is not partial to passion. The judge is responsible for hearing arguments from both sides, examining the relevant law, and applying that law to reach a final decision that is responsible solely and completely to the law, not the parties involved. Both myself and opposing counsel must respect the judge’s decision. If the outcome is not favorable to my client I am always happy to discuss any next steps that may be available or provide referrals to other resources.

See All Client Reviews

Heather Elizabeth Forrler's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Heather

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Ian De Verna headshot
Ian De Verna

Personal injury lawyer

Eric McDonald headshot
Eric McDonald

Family lawyer

Janice Morene Sutter headshot
Janice Sutter

Divorce and separation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  6.8 (Good)

Work Experience

2013 - Present

Attorney/Owner, Compass Legal Services, P.S.

2006 - 2013

Associate, Law Offices of Lynda H. McMaken, P.S.

2002 - 2006

Associate, Law Offices of J. Michael Koch

Associations

2014 - Present

Silverdale Chamber of Commerce

Member

2013 - Present

BNI-RNW

Mentor Coordinator

2002 - Present

Washington State Bar Association

Member

2002 - Present

Kitsap Bar Association

Member

Education

2002

Seattle University School of Law

Juris Doctor

1991

University of Washington -Seattle

B. A.

Speaking Engagements

2019

Legal Business Structures Legal Business Structures

2014

Seminar and CLE

Things to Know if You are Thinking About Divorce

2014

Seminar and CLE

What You Need to Know When Creating a Parenting Plan

2014

DV and Parenting Plans

Effects That Allegations or Findings of Domestic Violence Have on Parenting Plans and Residential Schedules

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution