No Photo

Thomas S. Olmstead

Licensed for 51 years

Personal injury Lawyer at Poulsbo, WA
Practice Areas: Personal Injury, Bankruptcy & Debt, Civil Rights ... +4 more

Po Box 68, Poulsbo, WA

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 1993
See Details
Claim Profile

Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.

About Thomas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 47 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 1978

Administrative Suspension

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 1993

Licensed in California for 51 years

State: California

Acquired: 1974

Not Eligible to Practice Law (Not Entitled)

Location

Law Offices of Thomas S. Olmstead

Po Box 68, Poulsbo, WA, 98370-0068

Law Offices of Thomas S. Olmstead

Po Box 68, Poulsbo, WA, 98370-0068

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Thomas S. Olmstead's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.6 /5.0

7 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (7) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 4 of 4 reviews | Trustworthiness

Posted by Mark | December 18, 2017 | Lawsuits & Disputes

Review

My wife contacted the Law Office of Olmstead and Somers asking if they had free consultations in which they replied they did. She set an appointment and sat down with him for no more than 30 minutes. She did not sign any paperwork or didn't discuss any price for the supposed "free" consultation . We ...decided to go to with another attorney. A few months later she received an invoice for a bill of $750.00! The bill was for "Timekeeper TO worked for 2.50 hours at $300.00 per hour" for "Conf. w/ client; Prepare temp order". Keep in mind the consultation was no where near 30 minutes and she had never agreed to move forward with this attorney, also the Temp Order was prepared by my wife and I prior to this visit. I called him as soon as we received the bill and immediately contacted the Law Office. He answered and kept repeating the phrase " why would I sit down with your wife for 2 and half hours for free." I asked him if she had signed or agreed to anything and he kept repeating the same phrase. I had also asked him about the preparation of the temp order and he immediately became silent.

Posted by anonymous | May 29, 2017 | Hired Attorney | Divorce & Separation

Run! Horrible experience!

I feel cheated. Tom was welcoming enough. Our initial meeting made me feel like I was finally going to have someone representing me in my divorce. Immediately after that, I found Tom to consistently be unavailable or too busy to take any questions or make any recommendations (he doesn't have a cel...l phone, either). The rare occurrences when he was available, he seemed fairly helpful. He gave lots of assurances, but never recommendations or next steps. I was happy until I realized that after over 6 months of waiting and trying to motivate my ex, her lawyer, and my lawyer to make progress that there was no active interest in my case or my well being. He wasn't even familiar with the case or my name. My questions were left to Mindy, his assistant, who gave the most minimal answers possible to get me to go away. I never received any amplifying information or help that I didn't directly think to ask for. I was always treated as an inconvenience to her. She was like a less helpful version of google, but most of the answers I needed weren't readily available online. Basically, I was on my own to navigate a difficult divorce, which I had never done before. I never received any advice on what to include or not include in my settlement offer even though I clearly needed help. I would have changed lawyers, but by the time I realized just how unhelpful they were I was approaching the end of the divorce and just used them to write out the paperwork and assist me in court. Then, when Mindy wrote out the final copy of the settlement, she misspelled my name (Bradley to Bradlie...never heard of it being spelled that way and it was only incorrect on the header). It was no big deal to me, until I was charged $50 to have it fixed. Are you f^@%# kidding me? I have no doubt that it was an intentional error made so that she could charge for another "30 minutes" of work. Also, when paying for Tom to drive to the courthouse for the hearing, I was charged for 4 hours ($1200) of driving and being at the courthouse. Port Orchard is 30 minutes away - maybe an hour if there's heavy traffic. The time in front of the judge only took about 10 minutes. I do not know what I was being charged so much for. Long story short, if you want to be treated like a person, or even not get robbed, run far and fast. I don't know if other lawyers act in a similar fashion, but I will never approach this office again. I recommend you don't either.

Posted by Ray | January 22, 2010 | Divorce & Separation

A Major disaster!

I was EXTREMELY disappointed with Tom Olmstead. I don't know how he performs with other clients, but for me, it was a MAJOR disaster that cost me thousands of dollars. He was not responsive to me, he did not follow through, he would not remember what he had told me previously, he would change his min...d on a strategy without talking to me about it, he did not show up on time to the court which caused me to lose by default, he did not keep his word to me on arrangements we made, he hung up on me, (and I was being polite), and then he quit on me without notice when I needed him the most. It almost seemed like he was working for my spouse rather than for me. He is a nice guy, friendly and all that, but I would never use him as a lawyer.

Posted by anonymous | May 20, 2008 | Litigation

Not A Clue

This lawyer took on my case in a lawsuit against my former employer. He brought on a partner to assist in the case who never really got involved. I hand fed him documnets, detailed information and questions and names for depositions. He affirmed our case was good and would give it his best effort. W...eeks go by with no calls or return calls or emails. His law partner quit mid-stream. His paraleagal was an early 20's kid who did most of the work, but had no clue as to this type of civil litigation. As months went by, we kept reminding him of expiration dates for discovery and depositions. Olmstead conducted depositions without our knowledge or presence, claiming it was his assistants fault for not calling us. This was the start of our loss. His questions at these depositions were weak and did NOT help our case. Some of the questions we provided for him in these depositions he didn't use. He said he wanted to use them at trial rather than at the depositions. During a meeting prior to the pre-trial, he promised he would call these people in for depositions and ask for a continuance. Our repeated calls to remind him to ask for this continuance and schedule dates for deposition resulted with little response or action. In fact he didn't do anything until the day of the pre-trail. The judge was furious at him for his lack of professionalism and knowledge of the system. In fact the instructions he gave us for our written statements was completely incorrect. The judge threw everything out due to hearsay. This hearsay was based on Olmsteads instructions and oversight. When the judge dismissed our lawsuit, Olmstead acknowledged he dropped the ball. His incompetence almost cost us thousands or dollars in a counter claim. Luckily the judge saw it was HIS incompetence not ours. After Olmstead was chewed out by the judge, he quickly packed his stuff and sped away in his brand new BMW. I believe he sabotaged our case because he didn't have a clue on what he was doing. He claims to be a Christian attorney with a conscience, but I think he uses the witness symbol on his business card to bait people into thinking he is trustworthy with your life and finances. If you want a pit bull for an attorney, don't choose this guy. He is verbally weak, clueless or a good liar, and non-responsive. He's a good story teller, and loves to tell you his glory days of once being a cop and a fed. Luckily it only cost me a good civil case. I'd hate to trust this guy if my life was on the line for a criminal case. Don't trust this guy, he's just another shyster lawyer.

See All Client Reviews

Thomas S. Olmstead's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Thomas

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 1993.

Censure issued in WA, 1993

updated on 01/13/2010

This means the attorney did something wrong, but the Bar did not suspend the lawyer. Typically in this case the lawyer's poor behavior is exposed to the public in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior.

Education

N/A

Southwestern Law School

J.D.

N/A

California State University at Northridge

B.A.

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 1993
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution