Mel L. Crawford

Mel L. Crawford

also known as Mel Crawford

5.0
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 32 years

Insurance Lawyer at Seattle, WA
Practice Areas: Insurance

3244 N.E. 103rd St., Seattle, WA

About Mel

Biography

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Insurance 100%

Mel represents people who have been denied short-term disability or long-term disability benefits. He has litigated numerous cases under "ERISA," the federal law that governs most employee benefits.

100%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 60 minutes


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 32 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 1993

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Law Office of Mel Crawford

3244 N.E. 103rd St., Seattle, WA, 98125

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Mel L. Crawford's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

77 Client Reviews

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Discrimination

Posted by anonymous | April 17, 2019 | Hired Attorney | Discrimination

Disability claim Expertise

My employer was a large software company and at first, I didn't have much confidence that my case would have a positive outcome. I was wrong. Not only did Mr. Crawford, review all the legal documents; he also prepared expeditious replies and ultimately I received fair compensation. As a client, I a...ppreciated his upfront, honest and expert advice and would recommend him especially for specific D&I issues.

See All Client Reviews

Mel L. Crawford's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Mel
Stacy Monahan Tucker headshot
Stacy Tucker

Insurance lawyer | Dec 19

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I was opposing counsel to Mel on a few different disability insurance matters when I represented insurance companies. My client would always complain when she heard that Mel was opposing counsel, stating that it would cost the insurer a lot to settle any case with him. He is very good at his job, and anyone would be lucky to have him as their attorney."

Alexander J. Higgins headshot
Alexander Higgins

Employee benefits lawyer | Aug 15

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Mel is an outstanding advocate. I often recommend clients to him on ERISA and disability insurance matters. He gets excellent results. He's hard-working and smart! What more could you ask for?!"

Robert S. Mahler headshot
Robert Mahler

Personal injury lawyer | Apr 07

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I have known Mel Crawford for 15 years. He is among the brightest, most dedicated, and talented lawyers I know. Mel is one of the truly outstanding civil litigators in Washington State and I strongly endorse him."

Jeffrey Erich Foster headshot
Jeffrey Foster

Litigation lawyer | Apr 07

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I've had the great pleasure of working with Mr. Crawford as co-counsel on a significant personal injury case. The decision to co-counsel with Mr. Crawford resulted from my experience with Mr. Crawford as opposing counsel in several employment-related litigation cases. Not only was Mr. Crawford a consummate professional in our dealings as opposing counsel, but he displayed true compassion for his clients. More importantly, Mr. Crawford worked tirelessly to achieve great success on his clients' behalf. I recommend Mel Crawford without equivocation and with sincere appreciation for his efforts and dedication on his clients' (and co-counsel) behalf."

Kenneth M Odza headshot
Kenneth Odza

Personal injury lawyer | Apr 02

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"Mel is a very bright and thorough trial lawyer. Mel and I have worked together on the opposite side of a difficult wrongful death case. Since we resolved our case, I have referred several plaintiffs' personal injury cases to Mel."

Kevin Lederman headshot
Kevin Lederman

Personal injury lawyer | Apr 01

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer's work. I have know Mel for many years and can tell you that should you hire him, you will not only be getting a very smart lawyer who practices with the utmost integrity, but you will also be gaining a person who cares very deeply about your personal plight."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2017

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2016

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2015

AV Peer Review Rating, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2013

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2012

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2011

Member, Who's Who In American Law

2011

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2010

2010 Best Lawyers, Seattle Met Magazine

1994

Rising Star, Super Lawyers

Work Experience

2015 - Present

Sole Practitioner, Law Office of Mel Crawford

1999 - 2015

Partner, MacDonald Hoague & Bayless

1993 - 1999

Associate Attorney, MacDonald Hoague & Bayless

Associations

1999 - Present

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington

Admitted

1998 - Present

United States Supreme Court Bar

Admitted

1996 - Present

United States Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit

Admitted

1995 - Present

United States District Court for the Western District of Washington

Admitted

1994 - Present

King County Bar Association

Member

1993 - Present

Washington State Bar Association

Member

Washington Employment Lawyers Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Gallupe v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc., 358 F.Supp.3d 1183 (2019)

Judgment entered against Sedgwick Claims Management Services

Anderson v. Liberty Mut. Long Term Disability Plan, --- F.Supp.3d ---- (W.D. Wa 2015)

Judgment against Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston

Mirick v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America, -- F.Supp.3d ---- (W.D. Wa 2015)

Judgment entered against Prudential Insurance Company

Hogan v. Unum Life Ins. Co.of America, -- F.Supp.3d --, 2015 WL 339576 (W.D. Wa. 2015)

Judgment against Unum

Lamuth v. Hartford Life and Acc. Ins. Co., 30 F.Supp.3d 1036 (W.D. Wa. 2014)

Judgment against Hartford

Doe v. Insurance Company

Settlement for $645,000.00

Beach et al. v. JD Lumber, Inc.

Court entered judgment in favor of all workers.

May v. Honeywell, Inc. and MetLife

Ninth Circuit held short-term disability benefits are wages.

Kull v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc. and Hartford Life Insurance Company

Court ordered de novo review of ERISA case

Maher v. Aetna Life Insurance Co., 186 F.Supp.3d 1117 (2016)

Plaintiff recovered all LTD benefits owing to her

Bunger v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America, 196 F.Supp.3d 1175 (2016)

Hancock v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 251 F. Supp. 3d 1363 (W.D. Wash. 2017)

Claim alleging Aetna breached its fiduciary duties sustained by Court

Reetz v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., 294 F. Supp. 3d 1068 (W.D. Wash. 2018)

See More Legal Cases

Education

1993

Harvard University Law School

JD - Juris Doctor, Magna Cum Laude

1990

Antioch University-Seattle

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2003

Wage and Hour Update

Wage and Hour Law

2000

Contract Law Essentials

Employee Handbooks

N/A

Seattle University

Guest Lecturer: Employment Law

Publications

2003

Lorman Educational Services Payroll Record-Keeping Requirements

2003

Lorman Education Services publication Deductions from Pay

2000

Thompson Promises Context, Extrinsic Evidence and the Employment Relationship (presented at Washington State Bar Association CLE “Contract Law Essentials – The Berg v. Hudesman 10th Birthday Celebration”)

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution