Kent Michael Fandel

Kent Michael Fandel

also known as Mike Fandel

5.0
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 39 years

Litigation Lawyer at Seattle, WA
Practice Areas: Litigation

605 5th Avenue S, Ste 900, Seattle, WA

About Kent

Biography

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Litigation 100%

Commercial litigation, real estate litigation, products and premises liability litigation, contract litigation.

40 years | 360 cases

100%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Oregon for 21 years

State: Oregon

Acquired: 2004

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Washington for 39 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 1986

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Graham & Dunn PC

605 5th Avenue S, Ste 900, Seattle, WA, 98104

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Kent Michael Fandel's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

5 star (1)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (0)

Posted by Tom | November 26, 2013

Good guy to have in your corner.

Mike is a valuable member of our team. In litigation, his diligent preparation and enthusiastic execution won us an important victory. Over the years, as his team has prepared our ongoing contracts I have confidence that if called on to defend them, Mike will be on firm ground.

See All Client Reviews

Kent Michael Fandel's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Kent
Michael T Morgan headshot
Michael Morgan

Unknown lawyer | Nov 12

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Mike is an intelligent, hard-working, and creative litigator. And these attributes make him a formidable advocate. Most importantly, it would be hard to find someone who loves serving his clients more than Mike. Mike obtains tremendous results for his clients, and is someone I would trust with any legal matter. If I needed a lawyer, I would hire Mike without hesitation. I highly endorse Mike."

William Scott Clement headshot
William Clement

Litigation lawyer | Jun 17

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer's work."

Russell Gerard Cofano headshot
Russell Cofano

Litigation lawyer | Jun 10

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I had the absolute pleasure of working with Mike while I was General Counsel for a large real estate brokerage company. On the scoreboard, Mike knows how to win cases. At the same time, Mike has a very practical side that allows him to understand the client dynamics that underscores every litigation. When to settle and when to try cases is the essential tension that I was forced to address and Mike was instrumental in helping me make the correct decision in every situation. In addition to his legal skills, Mike is down right fun to work with. I highly recommend Mike to anyone who wants a great litigator and a great person on their side."

David Mark Byers headshot
David Byers

Litigation lawyer | Jun 10

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse Mike without reservation. He is as skilled a litigator as you will find, and always crafts his approach to the practical realities of the situation and the ultimate goal."

View All Endorsements
Soojin Elise Kim headshot
Soojin Kim

Commercial real estate lawyer

Michael T Morgan headshot
Michael Morgan

Litigation lawyer

William Scott Clement headshot
William Clement

Construction and development lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2023

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell®

2023

Super Lawyer--Business Litigation--Top 100, Washington Super Lawyers

2022

best lawyer--commercial litigation, Best Lawyers in America

2022

Super Lawyer--Business Litigation--Top 100, Washington Super Lawyers

2022

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2021

Super Lawyer--Business Litigation--Top 100, Washington Super Lawyers

2021

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2021

best lawyer--commercial litigation, Best Lawyers in America

2020

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2020

Super Lawyer--Business Litigation--Top 100, Washington Super Lawyers

2020

Best Lawyer--commercial litigation, Best Lawyers in America

2019

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2019

Super Lawyer--Business Litigation--Top 100, Washington Super Lawyers

2018

Washington Litigation Star, Benchmark Litigation

2018

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2018

Super Lawyer--Business Litigation--Top 100, Washington Super Lawyers

2017

Super Lawyer--Business Litigation, Washington Super Lawyers

2017

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2016

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2016

Super Lawyer--Business Litigation, Washington Super Lawyers

2015

Super Lawyer--Business Litigation, Washington Super Lawyers

2015

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

Super Lawyer--Business Litigation, Washington Super Lawyers

2014

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

Super Lawyer--Business Litigation, SuperLawyers

2013

Seattle's Top Rated Lawyers of 2013, Law.com

2013

Washington Super Lawyers, Super Lawyer--Business Litigation

2013

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2012

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2011

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2010

Top Lawyer--Commercial Litigation, Seattle Met Magazine

2010

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2009

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2008

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2007

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2006

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2005

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2004

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2003

Super Lawyer,

2002

Super Lawyer,

2001

Super Lawyer,

2000

Super Lawyer,

Work Experience

2006 - Present

General Counsel, Director, Shareholder, Graham & Dunn, PC

Associations

American Bar Association

Insurance Coverage Committee Member

King County Bar Association

Member

Washington State Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Armesto v. Rosolino

Decision reversed in injunction vacated.

Malhotra v. Steinberg, et al.

Case dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, based on our client's motion to dismiss.

Orris v. Lingley

Case reversed and remanded due to issue of fact as to whether driver was in the course and scope of employment.

Huntsman Advanced Materials v. OneBeacon Insurance Company

On motions for reconsideration, Federal District Court in Idaho granted summary judgment on behalf of policyholder, awarding defense costs jointly and severally from the date of first notice of claim.

Mavin v. Larson and John L. Scott, Inc.

Jury verdict in favor of defendants on all counts.

Microgreen Polymers, Inc. v. The Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd.

Arbitrator ruled in favor of our client, awarding full royalties as calculated by plaintiff, plus interest and attorney fees.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1986

University of Puget Sound School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1983

University of Puget Sound

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2013

Ethics Issues for In-House Counsel

Ethics

2010

12th Annual Ethics, Professionalism, and Civility: The Hard Questions

Legal ethics

2006

Section of Taxation and Section of Real Property, Probate and Trust Law Joint Fall CLE Meeting

Protection of privilege

2006

Condo Hotel Sumit 2006

Avoiding Litigation Risks: Safeguards for Owners and Developers

2003

The Lodging Conference 2003

Risk Management: Safety & Security

2003

The Lodging Conference 2003

Landmark Legal Decisions and Hot Litigation Issues

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution