Braden Pence

Braden Pence

3.2
Rating: 8.8

Licensed for 15 years

Civil rights Lawyer at Seattle, WA
Practice Areas: Civil Rights, Personal Injury, Criminal Defense, Appeals

705 Second Ave, Suite 1500, Seattle, WA

About Braden

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Civil Rights 80%

Police brutality, misconduct. First Amendment rights.

80%
Appeals 5%

Washington State courts.

5%
Criminal Defense 5%

State and Federal courts.

5%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Contingency

33%-40%


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 15 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 2011

Active

No misconduct found

Location

MacDonald Hoague and Bayless

705 Second Ave, Suite 1500, Seattle, WA, 98104

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Braden Pence's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.2 /5.0

11 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (11) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 5 of 11 reviews

Posted by Kady Wiese - | September 16, 2026

Braden Pence Fumbles the Bag on the 1 —and I have a feeling it’s not the first time

I called McDonald Hoague & Bayless on Friday, 9/11, hoping to consult with a criminal defense attorney about a serious, time-sensitive matter. We are considering hiring private counsel to review a resolution offered to someone currently incarcerated before an important objection window closes. Bra...den Pence returned my call on 9/16 and introduced himself simply as “an attorney” returning my call. I had contacted several firms that Friday trying to get someone to respond before the deadline, so I genuinely did not recognize his name or know which office he was calling from. I asked if he had any information about my inquiry before I launched into the long story. He said no and told me to go ahead. I explained the criminal case, Drug Court, the deadline, and my recent frustrations getting time-sensitive messages through appointed counsel. After listening, his response was, “Well, you’re not their client. They don’t have to call you back.” I explained that I am an authorized representative whom the defense team has communicated with extensively in the past. I understand there are things they cannot disclose to me. My concern was making sure their incarcerated client received the information in time to make his own decision. Mr. Pence then told me I could hire a private criminal defense attorney, but “it will be a lot of money,” in a tone I found incredibly condescending. What he didn’t know—because he never asked—was that I had already taken out a substantial personal loan specifically to hire private defense counsel in Seattle. I knew exactly what private representation could cost and was prepared to pay a retainer via credit card immediately. I was simply looking for an attorney willing to hear me out and look at the case with fresh eyes. He then told me he only does civil-rights work now and that I needed a criminal defense attorney. I said yes—that was exactly what I was looking for and why I had contacted the firm. He again emphasized the expense and said he didn’t do that work anymore. At this point I was genuinely confused. He said, “Well, I’m just returning your call,” and then, “Well, you called me.” Yes—I had called his firm six days earlier, along with several others. That was precisely why I had asked at the beginning who he was and what information he had about my inquiry. Before I could even finish, he hung up on me. I wasn’t asking for free representation or demanding anything. I was a prospective paying client trying to find help during an extremely stressful and time-sensitive situation. If he no longer handles criminal defense, a simple, “I’m sorry, I don’t practice in that area anymore,” would have been perfectly fine. Instead, I was talked down to, repeatedly warned about how expensive an attorney would be without him knowing anything about my ability or willingness to pay, and ultimately hung up on. People call attorneys during some of the worst moments of their lives. Basic courtesy costs nothing. I was referred to MHB and will unfortunately be relaying this experience back to the person who referred me. I would never recommend Mr. Pence based on this interaction. An already difficult situation did not need to be made worse.

Posted by anonymous | September 15, 2026 | Hired Attorney

hidden costs

This lawyer is completely untrustworthy. He charged me exorbitant hidden fees that were never discussed upfront and padded his billing hours for basic administrative tasks. I felt completely taken advantage of during an already stressful time. He cares far more about draining your bank account than a...ctually fighting for your rights.

Posted by anonymous | August 30, 2026 | Hired Attorney

He had better things to do

Pence did not look after my case because he had better things to do. This law firm is located in an unsafe area and the staff are out to lunch. I wasn’t expecting F Lee Bailey exactly from this outfit but my experience was ridiculous it’s a failing firm

Posted by anonymous | August 10, 2026 | Hired Attorney

Disappointed

I hired Mr Pence to represent me in a criminal case but found he and the attorney he later recommended to be in over their heads. I am highly disappointed in the way he handled my case. I feel he drastically overcharged me for his services and found him to be clueless on many levels. His actions adde...d more stress to an already overwhelming situation, and I was left with more work instead of the support I initially sought

Posted by anonymous | August 09, 2026 | Hired Attorney

Lawyer mill

I hired Mr Pence to represent me in a criminal case but found he and the attorney he later recommended to be in over their heads. I am highly disappointed in the way he handled my case. I feel he drastically overcharged me for his services and found him to be unethical on many levels. His actions add...ed more stress to an already overwhelming situation, and I was left with more work instead of the support I initially sought

See All Client Reviews

Braden Pence's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Braden
Kjersti Taylor Stroup headshot
Kjersti Stroup

Appeals lawyer | Oct 16

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse Braden. He’s an asset to the legal community, and his thoughtfulness, diligence, and calm demeanor is appreciated in his client and attorney relationships."

Sean P Cecil headshot
Sean Cecil

Criminal defense lawyer | Dec 16

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. Braden is a bright young lawyer and dedicated to public interest concerns! I recommend his services without hesitation."

Stefanie Marie Dorn headshot
Stefanie Dorn

Unknown lawyer | Nov 14

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. I've known Braden since school and he has been consistently dedicated to defending the Constitution. He takes on hard cases, and he wins them. He cares deeply for his clients and their rights."

Aaron A Pelley headshot
Aaron Pelley

Criminal defense lawyer | Mar 21

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I worked with Braden in a co-defendant case and found that he was personable, professional and astute. He is a strong and zealous advocate for his clients and a credit to the legal profession. I endorse him without hesitation."

View All Endorsements
David Christopher Martin headshot
David Martin

Litigation lawyer

Aaron A Pelley headshot
Aaron Pelley

Criminal defense lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.8 (Excellent)

Honors

2015

Champion of Justice, Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

2014

Certificate of Recognition, Washington Defender Association

Work Experience

2022 - Present

Attorney, MacDonald Hoague & Bayless

2016 - 2022

Trial Lawyer, Mazzone Law Firm

2012 - 2016

Public Defender, Snohomish County Public Defender Association

2011 - 2012

Managing Partner, Law Office of Braden Pence

2010 - 2011

Law Clerk to the Honorable Thomas J. Wynne, Snohomish County Superior Court

2010 - 2010

Legal Intern, King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office

2009 - 2009

Legal Intern, Snohomish County Prosecuting Attorney's Office

2008 - 2008

Legal Intern, Morrow Kidman Tinker & Pence

2008 - 2008

Legal Intern, Municipality Of Anchorage

2005 - 2006

Legal Assistant, Law Office of Christopher Pence

Associations

Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

Washington Defender Association

Sample of Legal Cases

Freedom of Press

Dismissal of criminal charges

Freedom to Assemble

Restraining order issued, clients' rights vindicated

See More Legal Cases

Education

2010

Seattle University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

2005

Grinnell College

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2017

Filming the Fossil Fuel Resistance The First Amendment for Filmmakers

Languages

English

Spanish

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution