Michael Anderson Berry

Michael Anderson Berry

also known as M. Anderson Berry

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 6.6

Licensed for 16 years

Consumer protection Lawyer at Seattle, WA
Practice Areas: Consumer Protection

600 Stewart St., Suite 1100, Seattle, WA

About Michael

Biography

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Consumer Protection 100%

At Emery | Reddy, PLLC, our Data Breach Lawyers are committed to protecting the privacy rights of consumers and holding negligent organizations accountable.

100%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 1 year

State: Washington

Acquired: 2024

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in California for 16 years

State: California

Acquired: 2009

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Emery | Reddy, PC

600 Stewart St., Suite 1100, Seattle, WA, 98101

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Michael Anderson Berry's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Michael Anderson Berry's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Michael

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.6 (Good)

Work Experience

2025 - Present

Attorney, Emery Reddy, PLLC

Associations

2021 - 2023

San Juan Unified School District

Chairperson of School Board Facilities Committee

Sample of Legal Cases

In re Snap Fin. Data Breach Litig., No. 2:22-cv-00761 (D. Utah)

In re Landmark Admin LLC Data Incident Litig., No. 6:24-cv-082-H (N.D. Tex.)

In re Mednax Servs., Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litig., No. 21-md-02994 (S.D. Fla.)

In re Overby-Seawell Company Customer Data Security Breach, No. 1:23-md-03056-SDG (N.D. Ga.)

In re Panera Data Security Litig., No. 4:24-cv-847-HEA (E.D. Mo.)

In re PowerSchool Holdings, Inc. and PowerSchool Group, LLC, Customer Security Breach Litig., No. 25-md-3149-BEN-MSB (S.D. Cal.)

In re Proliance Surgeons Data Breach Litigation, No. 23-2-23579-7 SEA (King Cnty. Super. Ct.)

In re Prospect Medical Holdings, Inc., Data Breach, No. 2:23-cv-03216-WB (E.D. Pa.) (co-lead counsel)

In re Sequoia Benefits and Insurance Data Breach Litig., No. 3:22-cv-08217-RFL (N.D. Cal.)

In re Signature Performance Data Breach Litigation, No. 8:24-cv-00230-BBCB-MDN (D. Neb.)

In re Lakeview Loan Servicing Data Breach Litig., No. 1:22-cv-20955-DPG (S.D. Fla.)

Kersey v. Therapeutic Health Serv., No. 24-2-17679-9 (King Cnty. Super. Ct.)

Margul v. Evolve Bank & Trust, No. 1:24-cv-03259-DDD (D. Colo.)

Mcauley, et al. v. Pierce College District, No. 23-2-11064-7 (Pierce Cnty. Super. Ct.)

Pace v. Omni Family Health, No. 1:24-cv-01277-JLT (E.D. Cal.)

Rossi v. Claire’s Stores, No. 1:20-cv-05090 (N.D. Ill.)

Smith v. Apria Healthcare, LLC, No. 1:23-cv-01003-JPH-KMB (S.D. Ind.)

Swan v. North American Breaker Company, LLC, No. 2:25-cv-02002-HDV-KES (C.D. Cal.)

Ware v. San Gorgonio Memorial Hosp., CVRI2301216 (Cal. Super. Ct. Riverside Cnty.)

Holmes v. Elephant Insurance Company, et al., No. 3:22‐cv‐00487‐JAG (E.D. Va.)cla

Cordell v. Patelco Credit Union, No. 24CV082095 (Super. Ct. Cal. Alameda Cnty.)

Desue v. 20/20 Eye Care Network, Inc. et al., No. 0:21‐cv‐61275 (S.D. Fla.)

Desue v. 20/20 Eye Care Network, Inc. et al., No. 0:21‐cv‐61275 (S.D. Fla.)

Dudurkaewa et al. v. Midfirst Bank, et al., 5:23-cv-00817-R (W.D. Okla.)

Garcia v. Set Forth, Inc., No. 24-CV-11688 (N.D. Ill.)

Garcia v. Set Forth, Inc., No. 24-CV-11688 (N.D. Ill.)

Garcia v. Wash. Dep’t of Licensing, No. 22-2-05635-5 (King Cnty. Super. Ct.)

Gates v. Western Washington Medical Group, No. 23-2-08498-31 (Snohomish Cnty. Super. Ct.)

Hasbrook v. EP Global Production Solutions, LLC, No. 23STCV19711 (Cal. Super. Ct. Los Angeles Cnty.)

Burgin et al. v. Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, No. 23STCV06494 (Cal. Super. Ct. Los Angeles Cnty.)

Hulse v. Acadian Ambulance Service, Inc., No. 6:24-cv-01011-DCJ (W.D. La.)

In re Arthur J. Gallagher Data Breach Litig., No. 1:21‐cv‐04056 (N.D. Ill.)

In re Avis Rent A Car System, LLC, Security Incident Litig., No. 2:24-cv-09243-JXN

In re CaptureRx Data Breach Litig., No. 5:21-cv-00523 (W.D. Tex.)

In re Cerebral, Inc. Privacy Practices, No. 2:23-cv-01803-FMO (C.D. Cal.)

In re Eureka Casino Breach Litig., No. 2:23-cv-00276-CDS-DJA (D. Nev.)

In re Fred Hutchinson Cancer Ctr. Data Breach Litig., No. 23-2-24266-1 (King Cnty. Super. Ct.)

In re Laboratory Serv. Coop. Data Breach Litig., No. 2:25-cv-00685 (W.D. Wash.);

See More Legal Cases

Education

N/A

Uc Berkeley Sol Boalt Hall

N/A

University of California, Berkeley School of Law

J.D.

N/A

University of California, Berkeley

B.A.

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution