Norman Scott Stewart's Legal Cases (13)

Criminal defense

City v. T.H., case number Y07013049

Jun 05, 2007

OUTCOME: Dismissal of Charges

Scott represented T.H. at a jury trial on a charge of Assault Domestic Violence in Municipal Court. The defendant allegedly assaulted his girlfriend in a moving motor vehicle. The court initially denie ... d a defense motion for a Directed Verdict and then for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict. Following the trial the prosecution the Scott was able to convince the prosecution that the court's legal rulings had been incorrect and the City dismissed all charges.

Criminal defense

City v. M.P., case number K00057277

May 22, 2007

OUTCOME: Jury Verdict, Not Guilty

Scott represented M.P. at a jury trial on a charge of Driving Under the Influence in Municipal Court. The Jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty. The above is not intended as legal advice or as a g ... uarantee of the outcome of any future case. This is because every case has unique facts, and no one can ever guarantee results.

Criminal defense

City v. H.D.F., case number J00098984

N/A

OUTCOME: Jury Verdict, Not Guilty

Scott represented H.D.F. at a jury trial in Municipal Court on a charge of Driving Under the Influence. The arresting officer alleged that H.D.F. was extremely intoxicated and had driven his motor vehi ... cle onto local railroad tracks. H.D.F. had a breath alcohol content of .22 as registered on the breath test. During the trial the prosecutor called an expert witness from the Washington State Patrol's Breath Test Division who testified as to accuracy of the .22 breath test reading. In cross examining both the officer and breath test expert Scott challenged the results, noting that they were inconsistent with H.D.F.'s performance on the field tests, the officer's other observations, and H.D.F.'s statements regarding the amount of alcohol that he had consumed. The jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty. The above is not intended as legal advice or as a guarantee of the outcome of any future case. This is because every case has unique facts, and no one can ever guarantee results.

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

The Avvo Rating explained