Richard M. Stephens

Richard M. Stephens

also known as Dick Stephens

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 7.7

Licensed for 40 years

Land use and zoning Lawyer at Bellevue, WA
Practice Areas: Land Use & Zoning, Appeals, Election Campaigns & Political Law

10900 NE 8th St., Suite. 1325, Bellevue, WA

About Richard

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in District of Columbia for 14 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 2011

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Washington for 33 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 1992

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Oregon for 39 years

State: Oregon

Acquired: 1986

Inactive

No misconduct found

Licensed in California for 40 years

State: California

Acquired: 1985

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

Groen Stephens & Klinge LLP

10900 NE 8th St., Suite. 1325, Bellevue, WA, 98004-4469

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Richard M. Stephens's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Richard M. Stephens's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Richard
Brian Trevor Hodges headshot
Brian Hodges

Land use and zoning lawyer | Jan 23

Relationship: Worked for lawyer

"I’ve had the pleasure of working with Dick Stephens on several cases over the years, including a land use appeal that raised complex constitutional questions. He is an excellent attorney and advocate. He pays attention to both the big picture and the details. I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend him."

View All Endorsements
Samuel A Rodabough headshot
Samuel Rodabough

Real estate lawyer

Experience

Rating:  7.7 (Very Good)

Honors

2011

Rodney McFarland Award, Citizens' Alliance for Property Rights

Work Experience

1995 - 1996

Attorney, Washington State Legislature

1985 - 1994

Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation

Associations

2011 - Present

District of Columbia Bar Assocation

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Garcia v. United States

Success

Homebuilders Association of Kitsap County v. City of Bainbridge Island

Success

Washington Water Jet Workers Association v. Yarbrough

Success

Real Progress, Inc. v. City of Seattle

Success

Smith v. Regents of the University of California

Success

See More Legal Cases

Education

1985

Pepperdine University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

Speaking Engagements

2014

Litigating Open Government Cases

THE LATEST ON ANTI-SLAPP, INCLUDING ITS APPLICATION IN NON-GOVERNMENT LITIGATION

2003

Growth Management Act

Growth Management Act: Growth Management Act Procedures that Violate Due Process and Recent Developments in Takings Jurisprudence

2003

Government Takings

Government Takings: Just Compensation and Police Power Recent Cases Beg the Question

2002

Washington Land Use Law, Do We Still Have Property Rights?

Washington Land Use Law, Do We Still Have Property Rights?

2001

Land Use Law: Don't I Still Have Property Rights?

Land Use Law: Don't I Still Have Property Rights?

2000

Government Takings

Overview of Federal Regulatory Takings Law

1994

The Endangered Species Act

The Endangered Species Act

1994

Public & Private Rights in Land & Resources: Workable Solutions

Public & Private Rights in Land & Resources: Workable Solutions

1992

Inverse Condemnation and Related Government Liability

Inverse Condemnation and Related Government Liability

Publications

1993

University of Puget Sound Law Review Takings Law, Lucas, and the Growth Management Act

1993

Washington Legal Foundation Legal Backgrounder Washington State Must Respect Property Rights When Implementing the Growth Management Act

1992

Oregon Real Estate and Land Use Digest NInth Circuit Welcomes Takings Where State Courts are Inhospitable

1987

DePaul Law Review One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: The "Progress" Down the Employee Civil Rights Road

1987

DePaul Law Review The Fees Stop Here: Statutory Purposes Limit Awards to Defendants

1984

Pepperdine Law Review Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wyoming: Appomattox Courthouse Revisited

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution