Tahra Sinks

I was a client of Tahra Sinks. Specifically, she did not focus on what was in the children’s best interest. She belives that register sex offenders have the right to have sole custody of children. She was biased, used information to fit her agenda, she is not fair to all parties, she loves men that h...ave the power and money and did what she wanted regardless the legal parameters. She was forgetful on specifics, lost paperwork, did not tell the truth and over-billed charging interest when my bills were paid on time. I would not recommend using her legal services.

Ms. Sinks failed catastrophically. Do not allow the court to appoint her as a parenting coordinator to your case if it is at all complex, because she cannot handle the complexities of physical, sexual, or medical child abuse, mental illness, and parenting rights, despite assurances that she could. Sh...e delayed a reunification for three months while allowing the opponent to prejudice her severely with false documents and insane allegations. She ignored signs of child abuse despite being a mandatory reporter. For the pleasure of her services, she attempted to bill us nearly $20,000, despite the fact that we were the victims of a malignant opposing parent. She should be ashamed of herself, but apparently she is not.

I was a client of Tahra Sinks. Specifically, she did not focus on what was in the children’s best interest. She was biased, used information to fit her agenda and did what she wanted regardless the legal parameters. She was forgetful on specifics, lost paperwork, did not tell the truth and over-bille...d charging interest when my bills were paid on time. I would not recommend using her legal services.

Tahra was a PC in my custody matter. She would not address my concerns appropriately. She would not permit claims made against me to be contested or require proof of false claims. She did not respond to my requests for a schedule 3 months in a row. Granting respondent all requests. During her testimo...ny she was unprepared and ill informed. She made false statements because she couldn't recall. She placed blame on me for continuous partners introduced to child. Specifically, said I was preventing respondent from having a relationship because of her order to clear them by her office. Her timeline of events were inaccurate as well as the nature of the events. In general, she picked a side and met in private several times to advise respondent while never offering me any advise and later using this to say I have not improved and recommending child move with respondent out of state and away from her home/siblings/parent. Based on false information and personal bias.