Sander Marcus Hull

Sander Marcus Hull

5.0
Rating: 8.3

Licensed for 26 years

Litigation Lawyer at Portland, OR
Practice Areas: Litigation, Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

12909 SW 68th Parkway, Suite 320, Portland, OR

About Sander

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Litigation 50%

My litigation practice focuses primarily on personal injury (slip and fall, motor vehicle accidents, etc.), product liability (defective products that lead to injury) premises liability (unsafe conditions on real property that lead to injury), property damage, toxic exposures (such as asbestos, benzene, silica, etc.), false imprisonments, contract/lease disputes, and real property disputes in Oregon and Washington.

26 years | 100 cases

50%
Chapter 13 Bankruptcy 25%

I am involved in all aspects of developing Chapter 13 repayment plans, including preparing and filing documents, in Oregon and Washington.

26 years | 100 cases

25%
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy 25%

I am involved in all aspects of preparing and filing Chapter 7 bankruptcy documents for individuals and businesses in Oregon and Washington. Bankruptcy litigation is also incorporated into my practice.

26 years | 100 cases

25%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 21 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 2005

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Oregon for 26 years

State: Oregon

Acquired: 1999

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Sander Marcus Hull

12909 SW 68th Parkway, Suite 320, Portland, OR, 97223

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Sander Marcus Hull's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

4 Client Reviews

5 star (4)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (0)

Posted by anonymous | May 1, 2015

I would definitely recommend Sander Marcus Hall

I called Marc with a personal injury inquiry that I wasn't even sure anyone could help me with. He was very patient with me, listening to all my concerns and getting the facts before he decided if there was anything he could do to help. After speaking with him I decided to hire Marc for my case. He w...as wonderful! Very diligent and I like that he kept open communication with me so I was kept in the loop. He always provided me with his honest advice and would make sure I felt comfortable first before moving forward with any happenings in my case. I would definitely recommend Marc in the future!

Posted by Deena | April 24, 2015

I recommend Sander Marcus Hull

I called Marc with a personal injury inquiry that I wasn't even sure anyone could help me with. He was very patient with me, listening to all my concerns and getting the facts before he decided if there was anything he could do to help. Fast forward to my case ends and he was wonderful! Very diligent... and I like that he kept open communication with me so I was kept in the loop. He always provided me with his honest advice and would make sure I felt comfortable first before moving forward. I would definitely recommend Marc in the future!

Posted by Tina | June 3, 2014

The best attorney I've talked to! Very knowledgable and caring:)

I just spoke to this attorney about my unfortunate health situation,,advised to retain a mailpractice attorney and this attorney was amazing! Very nice to talk to, showed concern for this horrible situation as well as a resource to contact. I would absolutely recommend this firm to any person needing... help! A great legal website that offers others to ask questions that I have never seen out there as well as wonderful attorneys:))) Haven't hired this attorney but did give me a group to better address my situation.

Posted by Suzanne | November 21, 2013

I definitely would recommend Marc Hull as your attorney

I am writing this letter in praise and high recommendation of Marc Hull. I have had the great fortune of having Marc as my attorney in my medical malpractice suit. He has excellent character, takes prompt action and a very strong attention to detail. Marc's diligence and determination were matched o...nly by his integrity and unquestionable ethics.

See All Client Reviews

Sander Marcus Hull's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Sander
Donna J Smith headshot
Donna Smith

Litigation lawyer | Jun 11

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Marc is a formidable opponent with impressive courtroom abilities. He is smart, creative, and dedicated to his clients."

Lara M. Gardner headshot
Lara Gardner

Litigation lawyer | Nov 05

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I absolutely recommend Mr. Hull if you need assistance in any litigation or worker's compensation matter. He is extremely smart, and knows his stuff. He is the first person I call anytime I need help with a litigation matter."

View All Endorsements
Lara M. Gardner headshot
Lara Gardner

Chapter 7 bankruptcy lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.3 (Excellent)

Honors

2017

Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

Life Time Member, Strathmore's Who's Who

Work Experience

2015 - Present

Principal, Hull Law Offices

2012 - Present

Partner, Wallace & Hull, LLP

2010 - 2012

Associate, Radler, Bohy, Replogle & Conratt, LLP

2008 - 2010

Associate, Reinisch Mackenzie, PC

2005 - 2008

Senior Counsel, Jackson & Wallace, LLP

2001 - 2005

Associate, Todd Trierweiler & Associates

Associations

2012 - Present

FINRA

Arbitrator

2000 - Present

Multnomah Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Helen Pittman v. Nike, Inc.

Defense verdict.

In Re: Jones

Successfully transferred title of real estate to client.

Genova v. Young Living Products

Favorable settlement for Plaintiff.

Ioja v. Dr. Wooley

Favorable settlement for Plaintiff.

Dupuis v. Marriott

Reached a very favorable settlement for Marriott

Burnett v. Bergquist

Defense verdict.

American Express v. Wear

Favorable Verdict

Chernobelsky v. Rip CIty Management, et al.

Defense verdict

HICA Education Loans v. Richards

Favorable verdict

Discover v. Graves

Favorable Verdict

McAleer v. Robinson

Favorable Decision

See More Legal Cases

Education

1998

University of Oregon School of Law

Doctor of Jurisprudence

1994

University of Oregon

BS - Bachelor of Science

Speaking Engagements

2015

Real Estate Foreclosure: A Step by Step Workshop

Legal Ethics in Foreclosures

2010

Workers Compensation Section's 28th Annual Meeting

Third Party Civil Recovery

Publications

2015

Aspatore Thought Leadership: Bankruptcy and Financial Restructuring Law 2015 A Light at the End of the Tunnel: New Rules and Flexible Criteria Improve Bankruptcy Process

2013

Strategies for Consumer Bankruptcy Litigation: Leading Lawyers on Litigation Practice in a Consumer Bankruptcy Environment (Inside the Minds) Double Toil and Trouble: The Bubbling Cauldron of BAPCPA

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution