Paul A Thompson

I wouldn’t use Paul if he was the last attorney, better to do the legal process yourself. He is a bumbling idiot in my opinion. Wrong in his assertions and strategies at every turn and always freaking surprised. I know you can’t win every case but like other reviews have stated, he is unresponsive, n...egligent and petty. Watch out.

We hired Paul A. Thompson to help us get our money back from a contractor that did not dispute what he owed us. We had a terrible experience with Mr. Thompson. First, it took him more than EIGHT MONTHS to get our case, one where the other side was unrepresented and unresponsive, to an arbitration he...aring. Then it took him another NINE MONTHS to reduce the arbitration award into a judgment that we could use to collect our money back. It took Mr. Thompson three tries to get the arbitration award converted into a court judgment because he kept forgetting to attach the right documents, or to follow the right procedures. A year into this process, an attorney for the contractor pointed out that Mr. Thompson has named the wrong party. He took no steps to fix that problem. Several months later, defendants second attorney informed him of the exact same error (naming the wrong business). Although he took no steps to fix the underlying problem, this time, Mr. Thompson informed us of his error and indicated that he had a “conflict of interest” and could not represent us. We did not understand why this was an issue the second time and he did not explain the difference to us between the first and second time. By this point, we had paid him around $7,000 and still did not have our money back from the contractor. It is clear to us that Paul Thompson took a case he knew very little about, did not know the procedural rules and did not understand certain basic legal concepts. He demonstrated a lack of attention to detail, he was unresponsiveness to our questions, and he continually demonstrated a general unfamiliarity with construction law. In trying to negotiate some satisfaction from Mr. Thompson in lieu of his poor performance he rejected an amicable mutual release agreement with us. Had Mr. Thompson been upfront and earnest with us about his skill set and his experience, we would not have hired him—a fact that I am sure he was aware of when we first met with him. We spent two years, several thousand dollars, and untold stress and grief, only to do what we should have done in the first place—hire someone who knows what they are doing. We had a terrible experience with Paul Thompson.