John Cathcart Rake

John Cathcart Rake

also known as John Rake, John C. Rake

1.0
Rating: 8.2

Licensed for 15 years

Litigation Lawyer at PORTLAND, OR
Practice Areas: Litigation, Securities & Investment Fraud, Intellectual Property, Administrative Law

121 SW Morrison St #700, PORTLAND, OR

About John

Biography

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 150-495 per hour

Contingency

15%-40%

Pro bono

5 %


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 10 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 2015

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Oregon for 15 years

State: Oregon

Acquired: 2010

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Address 1

121 SW Morrison St #700, PORTLAND, OR, 97212

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

John Cathcart Rake's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

5 star (0)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (1)

Posted by anonymous | May 12, 2021 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Rake

John represented me briefly, he never exhibited an understanding of events, never had any insight observations suggestions or strategy beyond a pedestrian approach to preparing for trial which in his own notes he expressed slim chance of success for a projected $125,000 in expenses. He employs a vagu...e and ambiguous communication style designed to increase engagement and billable hours not towards respect or resolution. He adamantly refused to hear any criticism of his work. In my opinion a very poor lawyer indifferent to a clients input.

See All Client Reviews

John Cathcart Rake's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse John
Adam Gamboa headshot
Adam Gamboa

Intellectual property lawyer | Dec 11

Relationship: Co-worker

"John Rake is a bright and creative attorney. He understands businesses and startups and the myriad issues they face. His counsel is highly valuable to his clients."

Amber Zupancic-Albin headshot
Amber Zupancic-Albin

Litigation lawyer | Oct 23

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer. John is an incredibly bright and talented lawyer. He is a tremendous asset to the legal profession and is an outstanding advocate to each and every one of his clients."

View All Endorsements
Marjorie A Elken headshot
Marjorie Elken

Business lawyer

Amber Zupancic-Albin headshot
Amber Zupancic-Albin

Health care lawyer

Adam Gamboa headshot
Adam Gamboa

Litigation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.2 (Excellent)

Work Experience

2014 - Present

Attorney, Larkins Vacura LLP

2010 - 2014

Associate, Harrang Long Gary Rudnick, PC

2009 - 2010

Law Clerk, Legal Aid Services Of Oregon

2008 - 2008

Law Clerk, Multnomah County Attorney's Office

Associations

2014 - Present

Oregon State Bar, Intellectual Property Section

Executive Committee Member

2012 - Present

American Bar Association, Intellectual Property Section

Member

2009 - Present

Owen M. Panner American Inn of Court

Member

2010 - 2012

Multnomah Bar Association, Young Lawyers Section

Pro Bono Committee

Sample of Legal Cases

EasyPower v. Operation Technology, Inc. dba ETAP

Settled out of court

Peace River Seed Co-op v. Proseeds Marketing

Oregon Supreme Court reversed Court of Appeals opinion on attorney fees issue, and affirmed ruling on measure of damages due for breach of contract.

Reeves et al v. Wagner et al

Prevailed at Summary Judgment

CGI Technologies v. Rose

United States Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated the judgment of the Ninth Circuit, and remanded to the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of US Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen, 569 U.S. ___ (2013)

James v. Clackamas County

Appeal: Reversed in Client's Favor in Oregon Court of Appeals, and Affirmed in Client's Favor in Oregon Supreme Court

Smith v. Big Bear Homes, Inc.

Prevailed in arbitration

See More Legal Cases

Education

2010

Lewis & Clark Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

2004

University of Kansas

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Publications

2012

HLGR Intellectual Property E-News Nastygrams Can Backfire on Trademark Owners

2012

2010

Elder Law Section Newsletter New legislation limits garnishment of electronically-deposited public and retirement benefits

2009

Envtl. L The Friends of Yosemite Valley Saga: The Challenge of Addressing the Merced River’s User Capacities

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution