Julie R Vacura

Julie R Vacura

3.7
Rating: 9.7

Licensed for 41 years

Litigation Lawyer at Portland, OR
Practice Areas: Litigation

621 Sw Morrison St Ste 1450, Portland, OR

About Julie

Biography

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 22 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 2004

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Oregon for 41 years

State: Oregon

Acquired: 1984

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Julie R Vacura

621 Sw Morrison St Ste 1450, Portland, OR, 97205-3817

Law Offices of Julie R Vacura

621 SW Morrison St Ste 1450, Portland, OR, 97205

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Julie R Vacura's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.7 /5.0

3 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (3) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 2
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 1
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews

Posted by anonymous | May 07, 2019 | Hired Attorney | Real Estate

Cost Benefit wasn't there

We hired Ms. Vacura on a real estate dispute. We sold our primary residence and the buyers were unhappy. They were suing us for what we thought was a large sum of money. From our initial meeting, we were clear that we wanted the cheapest and quickest resolution to this case. We told Ms. Vacura th...e specifics of our case and told her that if we were at fault we were more than willing to write a check. However, we were advised that we had a defendable position. As the process proceeded, the fees from Ms. Vacura began to amass and we asked for a budget; which we received. However, ultimately Ms. Vacura went over budget by 2X. In addition, when Ms. Vacura maneuvered the case to bifurcate the damages from the legal fees, we asked that if by settling for even one dollar would we be liable for the plaintiff’s legal fees. Ms. Vacura assured us that this was not the case. She was painfully wrong. After the arbitrators ruled against us, I attempted to calmly discuss the matter of fees with Ms. Vacura and yet she became belligerent. She repetitiously kept saying that “no outcome was ever guaranteed” and that the “arbitrators had the law wrong.” We relied on Ms. Vacura’s professional advice in navigating the waters of this suit and yet we would have been better advised offering the plaintiffs the money they originally demanded. In the end we ended up spending more the money than the initial plaintiff demand. In fact, at one point the plaintiffs proposed a settlement at close to half the initial demand and we were advised by Ms. Vacura not to take the deal. It was clear that Ms. Vacura was more interested in booking hours than settling our case.

Posted by Emiliano | July 26, 2015 | Real Estate

A Bona Fide Five Star Law Firm

We had an urgent real estate issue which involved the improper clouding of the title to our property. We had spoken to several attorneys in the Portland area and even formally retained another attorney before it became evident that he misrepresented his experience in that area of law. (Also, despite ...knowing that we had an impending deadline, he took our retainer and the very next day, went on a 5 day vacation without ever disclosing that he been planning on leaving town for several months.) After getting our retainer back from the first lawyer, we did speak with a couple of other local attorneys regarding our legal problem. They were fine but seemed to be inclined toward escalating the matter instead of looking for a way to resolve it expeditiously and, without great expense. I was fortunate to speak with Ms. Vacura prior to retaining anyone else. Ms. Vacura along with her capable associate, attorney John Rake, offered a sensible option before initiating any aggressive legal action. Now don't misunderstand, this firm is a highly regarded aggressive and successful, litigation firm. Yet, instead of encouraging us to pursue that tact, they offered us a practical option. And it worked! We could not be more pleased. And when it comes to billing, you often DO NOT get what you pay for when it comes to legal representation. But both Ms. Vacura and John Rake, were up front regarding their services and fees, and they quite reasonable. I highly recommend considering a consultation with Larkins-Vacura before committing to retaining any other law firm in the Portland metro area.

Posted by Phyllis | February 06, 2014 | Business

Enter the Tiger

When I first interviewed 3 attorneys for my lawsuit I knew what type of Lawyer I needed. I needed a tiger because I knew It was going to be a long, hard battle against someone who had 18 years of complete control of a business in which I was 50 per cent owner. She made sense out of 57 boxes of evid...ence and a thousand bits of paper and e-mail all the while she and her staff were trying to keep up my morale. She worked long and hard on this case and even though this case took a lot out of her(2 1/2 weeks of trial) she always had a smile for me and others. Needless to say I did pick a tiger. She won the case hands down.

See All Client Reviews

Julie R Vacura's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Julie

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  9.7 (Superb)

Honors

2013

Martindale-Hubbell “AV” peer rating, Martindale-Hubbell

2013

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers

2013

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2012

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers

2012

Martindale-Hubbell “AV” peer rating, Martindale-Hubbell

2012

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2011

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2011

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers

2011

Martindale-Hubbell “AV” peer rating, Martindale-Hubbell

2010

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2010

Martindale-Hubbell “AV” peer rating, Martindale-Hubbell

2009

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2009

Martindale-Hubbell “AV” peer rating, Martindale-Hubbell

2008

Martindale-Hubbell “AV” peer rating, Martindale-Hubbell

2008

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2007

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2007

Martindale-Hubbell “AV” peer rating, Martindale-Hubbell

2006

Martindale-Hubbell “AV” peer rating, Martindale-Hubbell

2005

Martindale-Hubbell “AV” peer rating, Martindale-Hubbell

2004

Martindale-Hubbell “AV” peer rating, Martindale-Hubbell

2003

Martindale-Hubbell “AV” peer rating, Martindale-Hubbell

2002

Martindale-Hubbell “AV” peer rating, Martindale-Hubbell

2001

Martindale-Hubbell “AV” peer rating, Martindale-Hubbell

2000

Martindale-Hubbell “AV” peer rating, Martindale-Hubbell

1999

Martindale-Hubbell “AV” peer rating, Martindale-Hubbell

1998

Martindale-Hubbell “AV” peer rating, Martindale-Hubbell

1997

Martindale-Hubbell “AV” peer rating, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

1994 - Present

Partner, Larkins Vacura, LLP

1991 - 1993

Litigator, United States Department of Justice, Commercial Litigation Division

1986 - 1990

Associate, Miller Nash LLP

1984 - 1986

Law Clerk, U.S. Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeals

Associations

2010 - Present

Oregon State Bar

Uniform Civil Jury Instruction Committee

2005 - Present

Washington State Bar Association

Member

1984 - Present

Oregon State Bar

Member

2012 - 2012

Oregon State Bar

Special Investigator on Character and Fitness

1999 - 2002

Multnomah Bar Association

Board of Directors

1998 - 2005

Oregon State Bar

Business Litigation Executive Committee

1995 - 1998

Multnomah Bar Association

Professionalism Committee

1995 - 1997

National Conference of Bar Examiners

MPT Policy Committee

1993 - 2000

Oregon State Bar

Disciplinary Board, Region Five

1992 - 1995

Oregon State Bar

Board of Bar Examiners

Sample of Legal Cases

Oregon Brewing Company v. Excelled Sheepskin & Leather Coat Co., et al.

Obtained summary judgment on behalf of my client.

Coviello v. Armagno

Obtained a $2,000,000 verdict from a 12 person jury on behalf of the companies on claims of breach of fiduciary duties and conversion of company assets. Also obtained approximately $900,000 in attorney fees under the common benefit doctrine.

Farrand v. Ben Murray Construction, Inc.

Obtained a verdict in favor of my client from a 12 person jury.

Better Foods Land Investment Company v. Centerpointe LLC

Obtained an arbitration award in favor of my client for about $500,000 and an award of attorney fees after a four day hearing.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1985

Willamette University College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1981

Santa Clara University

undergrad

Speaking Engagements

2012

Oregon Trial Lawyers Association

Prosecuting a Derivative Shareholder Lawsuit

2011

Oregon State Bar

Powerful Motion Practice - Summary Judgment

2009

Multnomah Bar Foundation

Dealing with Experts

2007

Oregon State Bar

Powerful Motion Practice - Summary Judgment

2006

Oregon State Bar, Minimum CLE Committee

Taking and Defending Depositions

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution