Jason M Pistacchio

Jason M Pistacchio

1.0
Rating: 7.5

Licensed for 25 years

Litigation Lawyer at Portland, OR
Practice Areas: Litigation, Construction & Development, Commercial, Real Estate

888 SW 5th Ave Ste 500, Portland, OR

This attorney is currently not accepting new clients.
Reason: Not Practicing

About Jason

Biography

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 13 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 2012

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Oregon for 25 years

State: Oregon

Acquired: 2000

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Jason M Pistacchio

888 SW 5th Ave Ste 500, Portland, OR, 97204

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Jason M Pistacchio's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

5 star (0)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (1)

Posted by anonymous | November 17, 2016 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Puts money first before helping the client....

I had hired Jason to assist my elderly mother with a partner dispute that involved a government, subsidized multi housing project . At first I was very impressed with Jason, until it seemed that paying his high retainer was all that seemed to matter. In my case, the opposing party had not filed any... legal action and there were no subpoenas, interrogatories or requests for production at the current time; only a bunch of demand letters with empty threats and fancy wording. I wanted to "hold off" on paying Jason this high retainer until there had been a court action filed, which would have required us to pay necessary money to defend the case. During a two week period my attorney bill was escalating to close to $5000 with Jason continuously arguing with opposing council with the expectation I follow their every demand. Since the property was heading to foreclosure, it was imperative that certain paperwork was completed and turned into the government. I explained to Jason that I didn't have time to argue with opposing counsel's demands, while other serious matters were imperative with government deadlines. To make a long story short, he didn't like that I was resisting his direction and advice, and expected a $25,000 retainer for him to continue his services. I went with my gut instinct, and let this guy go and handled my mom's case myself. By October 1, I was able to regain full compliance on the property as well as a substantial rental increase, starting 2017. It was the biggest increase the property has seen since it was purchased in 1982. If you are someone who is rich and has a lot of money to waste on unnecessary litigation that doesn't even exist... then Jason is the guy for you. Otherwise, do your research and hire an attorney who works on your behalf while believing in you and your case. Stay away from those who will bleed you dry while not stopping opposing council from abusing you without a care in the world.

See All Client Reviews

Jason M Pistacchio's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Jason
Thomas J Murphy headshot
Thomas Murphy

Construction and development lawyer | May 27

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. Jason is highly competent, entirely professional in his dealings with colleagues in the bar, and very personable."

Bonnie Richardson headshot
Bonnie Richardson

Litigation lawyer | May 22

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.5 (Very Good)

Honors

2013

2013 Rising Star - Business Litigation, Super Lawyers Magazine

Work Experience

2000 - Present

Attorney, Cosgrave Vergeer Kester LLP

1999 - 2000

Clinic Intern, Lane County District Attorney's Office

1999 - 2000

Clinic Intern, Douglas County District Attorney's Office

Associations

2013 - Present

Northwest Utility Contractor's Association

Member

2012 - Present

Owen M. Panner American Inn of Court

Barrister

2010 - Present

Portland Business Circle

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Partnership Dispute

Timber Trespass

Construction Lien Foreclosure

Construction Contract Dispute

Software Services Contract Dispute

Property Line Dispute

See More Legal Cases

Education

2000

University of Oregon School of Law

JD

1996

Washington State University

BA

Speaking Engagements

2013

Asian Pacific American Chamber of Commerce

Your Business -- You've Built It, Now Protect It

2012

Client Conference

Fraud Prosecution: Criminal or Civil

Publications

2009

Oregon Civil Litigation Manual Case Investigation, Chapter 5 (2004 Revs, 2009 Supp.)

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution