Karen Dana Oster

Karen Dana Oster

also known as Karen Dana Fienberg

5.0
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 34 years

Patent application Lawyer at Lake Oswego, OR
Practice Areas: Patent Application, Patent Infringement, Intellectual Property

17791 SW Overlook Lane, Lake Oswego, OR

About Karen

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Patent Application 80%

Preparation and Prosecution of patent applications before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. In other words, I help clients write patent applications and handle the process of obtaining a patent.

33 years | 800 cases

80%
Patent Infringement 15%

Mostly I provide analysis and opinions. For example, a client may ask me to provide a noninfringement opinion if they receive notice from a patent holder that they infringe a patent. I would also review competitors' products to determine if they infringe a client's patent.

33 years | 50 cases

15%
Intellectual Property 5%

Although I do not practice copyright, trademark, or other forms of intellectual property law, I do help clients identify issues in many intellectual property fields.

33 years

5%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes

Hourly Rates

$ 250-300 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Oregon for 30 years

State: Oregon

Acquired: 1995

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in California for 34 years

State: California

Acquired: 1991

Resigned

No misconduct found

Location

Law Office of Karen Dana Oster, LLC

17791 SW Overlook Lane, Lake Oswego, OR, 97034

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Karen Dana Oster's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

7 Client Reviews

5 star (7)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (0)

Posted by Fadi | August 16, 2021 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Best Patent attorney in TOWN

Karen has been my patent attorney for over 10 years now. The knowledge Karen has when it comes to patents is unmatched in my opinion. I have filed over 15 patents with her, of those patents over 10 have been issued and some are still pending. She is honest and trustworthy, I cannot recommend her enou...gh. She always answers my calls in timely fashion and her prices are fair. She has also shot down many of my ideas saving thousands of dollars that could have been wasted.

Posted by anonymous | July 28, 2021 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Patent Process and Assignment

Karen far exceeded our expectations in describing our technology for patent consideration. Her ability to ask great questions. Then apply those answers, thoughts and ideas along with our poorly written abstract into a clear vision for our patent was impressive. We would highly recommend her skills to... anyone! Thank you Karen.

Posted by Greg | April 6, 2012

Karen was very professional in helping me understand patent law

Karen was kind enough to take the time to help me understand how patent law affected my business. She was professional and courteous and I would recommend her to anyone that was in the same situation as I.

Posted by Angela K. | April 6, 2012

I recommend Karen any chance I can!

Karen is a wonderful attorney that I recommend any chance I can. I have worked with her several times and throughout our work together she was very helpful - educating me about the formal patent process, the most effective way to protect my ideas and has always been very willing to teach me how to do... some of the initial research myself - I am always very appreciative of attorneys who are willing to share knowledge that will save money, time and potential legal headaches in the future.

Posted by Ralf | October 7, 2009

Professional Service - Patent Applications

The professional service provided by Karen Dana Oster has been beyond my expectations. I have worked with other law firms in the past but have not experienced the care and professionalism given by Ms. Oster.

See All Client Reviews

Karen Dana Oster's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Karen
Usman Azeez Mughal headshot
Usman Mughal

Patent application lawyer | Aug 20

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse Karen for being a fair-minded and highly competent patent attorney. She has tremendous experience dealing with small clients and their inventions. She navigates her clients through the complex system of US and foreign patent offices. I highly recommend her for patent preparation and prosecution."

Maad Abu-Ghazalah headshot
Maad Abu-Ghazalah

Intellectual property lawyer | Mar 28

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I own a small business designing software for patent attorneys (as well as being a patent attorney myself) and I frequently use Karen as a reference when trying to decipher the nuances of IP Law and the operations of the US PTO. She's a very clear thinker and really knows her stuff, and I have greatly benefited from her input over the past ten years."

Mark Christopher Farrell headshot
Mark Farrell

Intellectual property lawyer | Oct 14

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Karen Oster gives good business advice. She knows how to assess a client's needs, whether the client is an individual person or a large corporation. Karen's patent documents are notable for their exquisite clarity, and her track record of successes is impressive. Her ability to stimulate a company's innovation and to provide a valuable Intellectual Property portfolio can be summed up in two words: "impressive" and "reliable.""

Douglas B Ferguson headshot
Douglas Ferguson

Intellectual property lawyer | Oct 05

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse this lawyer's work. She is very knowledgeable about the intricacies of practice before the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. I have seen samples of her work and have been very impressed by their quality."

View All Endorsements
Usman Azeez Mughal headshot
Usman Mughal

Patent application lawyer

Scott Robert Hansen headshot
Scott Hansen

Patent application lawyer

Mark Christopher Farrell headshot
Mark Farrell

Patent application lawyer

Douglas B Ferguson headshot
Douglas Ferguson

Patent application lawyer

Paul Ye-Chou Feng headshot
Paul Feng

Patent application lawyer

Jeff Woller headshot
Jeff Woller

Patent application lawyer

Samantha Pak headshot
Samantha Pak

Intellectual property lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2022

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2021

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2012

Preeminent AV rating, Martindale-Hubble

2011

Senior Member, IEEE

Work Experience

2002 - Present

Patent Attorney, Law Office of Karen Dana Oster, LLC

1999 - 2001

Patent Attorney, Miller Nash LLP

1994 - 1999

Patent Attorney, Chernoff, Vilhauer, McClung & Stenzel

1993 - 1994

Patent Attorney, Poms, Smith, Lande & Rose

Associations

2009 - Present

Oregon Patent Law Association

Executive Committee

2009 - Present

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers

Intellectual Property Committee

2007 - Present

National Association of Patent Practitioners

Member

2006 - Present

NW Patent Network

Member

2004 - Present

Oregon State Bar, Computer and Internet Law Section

Member

2004 - Present

Oregon State Bar, Computer and Internet Law Section

Executive Committee

1994 - Present

Oregon State Bar Intellectual Property Section

Member

1992 - Present

Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers

Member

2010 - 2010

Oregon State Bar, Computer and Internet Law Section

Secretary

2001 - 2001

Oregon State Bar, Intellectual Property Section

Chair

1994 - 2002

Oregon State Bar, Intellectual Property Section

Executive Committee

Sample of Legal Cases

Resistant mechanical combination lock and improvements thereto

Issued Patent

Digital x-ray diagnosis and evaluation of dental disease

Issued Patent

Fixture de-embedding method and system for removing test fixture characteristics when calibrating measurement systems

Issued Patent

Isotropic ring magnet linear voice coil motor

Issued Patent

Cap at resistors of electrical test probe

Issued Patented

Modular active test probe and removable tip module therefor

Issued Patent

Pattern testing board and system

Issued Patent.

Method of discovering and installing clients for digital copier services

Patent Issued

Percutaneous cellulite removal system

Patent Issued

Resource point game mechanic

Patent Issued

See More Legal Cases

Education

1992

California State University, Long Beach

BS - Bachelor of Science

1990

Loyola Law School, Loyola Marymount University

JD - Juris Doctor

1987

University of California - Santa Barbara

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2012

Portland Womens Legal - CLE Presentation

What You and Your Clients Need To Know About Patent Reform

2009

Portland Womens Legal - CLE Presentation

Developments in Patent Law

2009

GameStorm

Altenatives for Patent Protection

2002

Oregon State Bar Computer Law Section Annual CLE

Software Patent Basics

2000

ORCNET Meeting

Protecting Intellectual Property Using Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, and Trade Secrets

Publications

2009

Oregon State Bar Computer and Internet Law Section e-Commerce Deskbook “Patents and E-Commerce”

2001

Federal Circuit Patent Case Digests published by West Group Federal Circuit Patent Case Digests

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution