Edward Bernard Batista

Edward Bernard Batista

also known as Edward B. Batista

4.4
Rating: 6.5

Licensed for 27 years

Litigation Lawyer at Nevada City, CA
Practice Areas: Litigation, Estate Planning, Appeals ... +2 more

227 Broad Street, #201, Nevada City, CA

About Edward

Biography

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Litigation 40%

See website: ebblawfirm.com

14 years

40%
Estate Planning 30%

See website: ebblawfirm.com

14 years | 1,000 cases

30%
Appeals 10%

See website: ebblawfirm.com

14 years

10%
Contracts and Agreements 10%

See website: ebblawfirm.com

14 years

10%
Real Estate 10%

See website: ebblawfirm.com

14 years

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 27 years

State: California

Acquired: 1998

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Edward B Batista

227 Broad Street, #201, Nevada City, CA, 95959

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Edward Bernard Batista's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.4 /5.0

7 Client Reviews

5 star (6)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (1)

Posted by Robert | November 27, 2018 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Do not hire Edward Batista

My experience with Edward Batista was very negative. I was one of three trustees and the lawyer for the problem trustee, who is known to be a pugnacious attorney, floated the idea of a private fiduciary. I expressed interest in this but Edward Batista, despite knowing what kind of people the other tr...ustee and lawyer were, dismissed the option outright saying “I would only go that route if we were in a quagmire.” It turned out to be a case of self-fulfilling prophecy because Edward Batista led me into a quagmire that took 16 months and tens of thousands of dollars to resolve (ultimately with another attorney representing me). The kicker was that two months later before the hearing, Edward Batista approached me about a private fiduciary as if he had come up with it de novo. Not only that but Edward Batista failed to notice two of the beneficiaries (the other lawyer knew the trust better than Edward Batista, even though it was written by Edward Batista), which allowed the problem trustee to continue squatting at the real property for 45 more days and wasted a hearing. Moreover, Edward Batista is sloppy in his record keeping, he lacks attention to detail, and his work is of poor quality. (Every document he produced for me had mistakes and typos.) Here is an example of a very serious error he made on one of my grandmother's important legal document, where I have anonymized the names: "If conservatorship of the principal's person or estate, or both, is deemed necessary, the principal hereby nominates , as conservator of the principal's person or estate. If is unable or unwilling to serve, I nominate Person A Person B as my conservator." Where I have replaced the actual names with Person A and Person B. So here we have a paragraph in a finalized, binding legal document where there is a blank for the person named as conservator of the principal's person or estate and two names run together as successors. That paragraph was never invoked but even so that is a completely unacceptable error and Edward Batista's work is replete with such errors. And there were times I would correct Edward Batista and he would ignore me and still get things wrong. In summary, I believe Edward Batista advised me in his own interest, not in my interest, nor in the interest of the trust and he displayed gross incompetence while I retained him as an attorney. For these reasons I must caution others against hiring him for any matter.

Edward Batista

Replied last December 10, 2018

I take all such opinions by clients very seriously. A few things should be known: (1) This all happened well over a year ago -- I would think that honest and accurate beliefs don't wait over a year to make such severe and lengthy claims. (2) By pure happenstance I ran into this reviewer's subsequent attorney in court -- upon realizing who we were she told me very confidently that I had handled the matter well ... but that "you know how clients are ... sometimes they just need a change." (3) The review is very, very, inaccurate. Perspective: had the "bad" trustee who lived in the house acted correctly there would have been no need for attorneys at all; that is how litigation often works ... we attorneys inherit a bad situation from the start. It’s not our fault. (4) I tried contacting this reviewer in the most courteous way possible ... I offered to talk it over and find a resolution that might be to his satisfaction. He declined by repeating what is the most aggravating aspect of his claims -- my motives. (5) I'll accept any criticism as something I should look at to see how I can improve -- but to suggest that things went the way they they did so I could line my pockets? Nothing could be farther from the truth ... I swear on everything I hold dear. Thank you for taking the time to hear me out! EB

Posted by Ann | June 30, 2017 | Consulted Attorney

This review is from a potential client who consulted with this attorney.

Ann Black

My first impression of Mr Batista was very positive. I went home and enthusiastically reported on finding such a serious and knowledgeable lawyer. I gave him 750.00 to start a limited partnership for my acreage with my two sons. Because of personal family events I had to cancel his services. Mr Batis...ta readily sent me a refund for funds unused, 360.00.

Posted by Chris | June 23, 2017 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Complete satisfaction

I hired Ed about 8 years ago for a very difficult easement case involving a former friend of mine. The case dragged on for years and was a great emotional and financial drain. Ed did a great job on my case, winning me a judgment as a defendant, along with court costs and punitive damages awarded to m...e even though I was a defendant in the case. He also won a subsequent appeal in the same case. Ed won so decisively that the appeals court ruling was largely copied word for word from his own arguments. Ed is a fantastic lawyer, and I am certain that hiring him allowed me to navigate a very difficult phase of my life with the best possible outcome. I stand behind him as a man of great integrity and recommend him highly.

Posted by Shawn | June 11, 2017 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Great Lawyer

I hired Edward Batista to help me in my property case. He has been very fair, honest, trustworthy, and hard working. He has gone above and beyond all expectations to win my case. I would highly recommend him.

Posted by Sharon | June 9, 2017 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Brilliant Attorney

Mr. Batista handled an extremely difficult probate issue for me. He picked up the case after I had already fired three attorneys. He handled the situation brilliantly. He has a knack for sifting through the irrelevant issues and addressing what is necessary. As a result of his skill, I had a very... positive outcome with my case. I was not an easy client. Mr. Batista handled my personality with grace and helped me see that he had my best interest at heart. Mr. Batista IS the attorney that you want on your side........

See All Client Reviews

Edward Bernard Batista's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Edward

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.5 (Good)

Associations

Nevada County Bar Association

Member

California Department of Real Estate

Broker

American Bar Association

Member

State Bar of California

Member

California Notary

Notary Public

Education

N/A

Western State Univ COL

law

N/A

SUNY

undergraduate

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution