David Emilio Mastagni

PRO

David Emilio Mastagni

also known as David E. Mastagni

4.5
12 reviews
This is an aggregated review score of Avvo and Lawyers.com reviews.
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 26 years

Class action Lawyer at Sacramento, CA
Practice Areas: Class Action, Constitutional, Employment & Labor ... +2 more

1912 I Street, Sacramento, CA

Free Consultation

About David

Biography

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Appeals 20%

20%
Class Action 20%

27 years

20%
Constitutional 20%

27 years

20%
Employment and Labor 20%

27 years

20%
Litigation 20%

27 years

20%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes

Hourly Rates

$ 300-650 per hour

Contingency

33%-40%

Retainer

Sometimes


Payment Methods

  • Check

Awards

Platinum Client Champion
AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating

Licenses

Licensed in California for 26 years

State: California

Acquired: 1999

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Mastagni Holstedt, APC

1912 I Street, Sacramento, CA, 95811

mastagni.com

Mastagni Holstedt, APC

3400 Inland Empire Blvd, #101, Ontario, CA, 91764

mastagni.com

Mastagni Holstedt, APC

6689 Owens Drive, Suite 100, Pleasanton, CA, 94588

mastagni.com

Online Presence

Other places you can find David online.

David Emilio Mastagni's Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (1) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 0
4 stars 1
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 0
Practice Areas
What Clients Mention

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review

Posted by anonymous | April 30, 2018 | Employment & Labor

Still speaking

I'm still in consultation with a collegue at the firm. So far so good. Looking over my papers now. Hopefully they can hold my company & management accountiable for their jobs, just like I am held accountiable for my job.

See All Client Reviews

David Emilio Mastagni's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse David

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Jeffrey Wayne Bishop headshot
Jeffrey Bishop

Litigation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2025

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2024

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2023

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2022

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2021

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2020

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2019

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2018

America’s Top 100 High Stakes Litigators, America’s Top 100 High Stakes Litigators

2018

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2017

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2016

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2015

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2014

Rising Star, Super Lawyers

2013

Rising Star, Super Lawyers

2012

Rising Star, Super Lawyers

2011

Rising Star, Super Lawyers

N/A

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

N/A

Client Champion Award, Martindale-Hubbell

N/A

Top Attorneys in Sacramento 2015-2019, Sacramento Magazine

N/A

Selected To Super Lawyers: 2015-2019, Super Lawyers

N/A

Best of the Bar 2013-2016, Sacramento Business Journal

N/A

American Jurisprudence Bancroft-Whitney Award, UC Berkeley SOL Boalt Hall

N/A

Peer Review Rating of AV Preeminent, Martindale-Hubble

N/A

Super Lawyers Northern California Rising Stars 2011-2014, Super Lawyers

Work Experience

1999 - Present

Partner, Mastagni, Holstedt, Amick, Miller & Johnsen

1900 - Present

Partner, Mastagni Holstedt, A.P.C.

Associations

Sacramento County Bar Association

Labor and Employment Law Section of the State Bar of California

American Association for Justice

AFL-CIO Lawyers Coordinating Committee

American Bar Association, Section of Labor and Employment Law

California Employment Lawyers Association

Sample of Legal Cases

Aboudara v. City of Santa Rosa (May 10, 2019, Case No. 4:17-cv-01661-HSG)

Settled for $976,672.28., 2019

Cal Fire Local 2881 v. California Public Employees' Retirement System (2019), ---P.3d---, 2019 WL 1008413

Quiroz v. City of Ceres (E.D. Cal., Mar. 1, 2019, No. 117CV00444DADBAM) 2019 WL 1005071

Settled for $150,000.

Valentine v. Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District (E.D. Cal., Feb. 15, 2019, No. 217CV00827KJMEFB) 2019 WL 651654.

Settled for over $1.376 million.

Englert v. City of Merced (E.D. Cal., Dec. 21, 2018, No. 118CV01239LJOSAB) 2018 WL 6727995

Seguin v. County of Tulare (E.D. Cal., Apr. 24, 2018, No. 116CV01262DADSAB) 2018 WL 1919823,

Settled for over $190,000.00.

Slezak v. City of Palo Alto (N.D. Cal., June 22, 2017, No. 16-CV-03224-LHK) 2017 WL 2688224

$165,00.00 recovery

City of Palo Alto v. Public Employment Relations Board (2016) 5 Cal.App.5th 1271, review denied (Mar. 15, 2017)

Obtained ruling ballot measure violated the MMBA

Ketchum v. City of Vallejo, 523 F. Supp. 2d 1150 (E.D. Cal. 2007)

The claims were resolved through a bankruptcy settlement for for an aggregate claim of $659,880.00, a portion of which was discharged in bankruptcy.

Mitchell v. County Of Monterey (5:08-cv-01166-JW)

Settled for approximately $441,000.00 and policy changes that included 8-16 hours of annual compensatory leave for non-parties and an overtime definition that surpasses FLSA requirements.

Horton et al v. County of Sacramento (2:09-cv-00806-FCD-KJN),

$210,000.00 settlement.

Abubakar, et al. v. County of Solano (6-CV-2268-LKK-EFB)

$1.425 million settlement.

Fay et al. v. The Wackenhut Corporation et al. (San Mateo County Superior Court, Case No. CIV 454586)

$1.75 million settlement.

Black v. City of Marysville (2:06-cv-01104-GEB-EFB)

Settled for approximately $120,000.

Anderson et al. v. The County of Tulare (Case 1:05-cv-01498-FVS-SMS)

Settled for $1,100,000.00.

Alba v. City and County of San Francisco (Case 3:05-cv-01667-TEH)

Settled for approximately $625,000.00.

Belmont v. County of San Mateo (4:05-cv-03192-SBA)

Settled for approximately $180,000.00.

Agdipa v. Grant Joint Union High School District (2:06-cv-01365-RRB-DAD)

Settled for approximately $46,329.94.

Ahrens v. City of Roseville (2:05-cv-00389-GEB-GGH)

Settled for approximately $180,000.00.

Unfiled Claim by approximately 60 Mountain View Firefighters

Settled for approximately $550,000.00.

Placer County, Cal. v. Baldwin (2006) 546 U.S. 1170, 126 S.Ct. 1331

Abbott v. County of Sacramento (2:02-cv-00693-FCD-DAD)

Settled for approximately $900,000.00.

Mortensen v. County of Sacramento, 368 F.3d 1082, 1085 (9th Cir. 2004)

Farnsworth v. City of Sacramento Civil Service Bd., (3rd Dist. 2003) 2003 WL 22793116

Appellate Court affirmed issuance of the Writ.

Rath v. Sacramento County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n (3d Dist. 2002) 2002 WL 32355

Appellate court reversed trial decision.

Sacramento Police Officer’s Ass’n v. Venegas (3rd Dist. 2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 916

City ordered to provide officer adverse comments maintained by Internal Affairs in his personnel files.

Stockton Police Officers Ass'n v. City of Stockton, San Joaquin County Superior Court, Case No. 39-2010-00245197

Superior Court ruled city cannot reject labor contract by declaring a fiscal emergency.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1999

UC Berkeley SOL Boalt Hall

law

1996

University of California at Davis

BA

1996

Univ of California Davis

undergraduate

Speaking Engagements

2019

Public Records Act Litigation Seminar Battle Royal Over Police Records and the PRA

2019

Open Meetings and Open Records Conference 2019 “An Update on the State of the PRA and Police Personnel Records”

2019

League of California Cities Annual Conference & Expo Re-imagining Modern Policing In California

2018

CPOA Training Public Records Act

2017

Public Records Act Litigation

“Public Records Act Litigation: Special Issues Involving Law Enforcement”, speaker at in Sacramento on June 10, 2015.

2017

30 Hour POST approved Class

“Law Enforcement and Legalities in the New Millennium”

2017

30 hour P.O.S.T. approved course

“Law Enforcement and Legalities in the New Millennium”

2016

PORAC 2016 Conference

“Shots Fired, Union Down: MAPE v. MCERA and Other Legal Assaults on Public Sector Unions”,

2015

PORAC 2015 Conference

“Vested Rights and Protecting Health Care Benefits during Negotiations”

2014

2013

CUSA Conference

"Social Media for Public Employees: What’s Legal?” & "Discharging Pension Obligations in Bankruptcy"

2012

Michael D. McNeill Western Regional Fire Fighters Conference SOCIAL MEDIA: New Legal Rights and Responsibilities for Firefighters, Unions, and Employers

2012

2012

Corrections USA Conference

Collective Bargaining Under Assault: Contract Impairment Based Upon Claimed Fiscal Emergency

2012

COPSWEST

The Latest On Video and Microphone Technology & the Law

2011

PORAC Symposium

The State of Local Agency Negotiations: What Is on or Just over the Horizon

2011

Michael D. McNeill Western Regional Fire Fighters Conference Wage and Hour Issues for Firefighters

2010

PORAC Conference

Enforcement of Your Legal Rights While Negotiating Through the Economic Crisis

Publications

2017

2012-2019 Midwinter Treatise Supplement: The Fair Labor Standards Act, American Bar Association, Section of Labor and Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act Subcommittee. Midwinter Treatise Supplement: The Fair Labor Standards Act

2012

2012 Midwinter Treatise Supplement: The Fair Labor Standards Act by the American Bar Association, Section of Labor and Employment Law, Fair Labor Standards Act Subcommittee 2012 Midwinter Treatise Supplement: The Fair Labor Standards Act

2012

California Employment Law Letter,Vol. 21, Issue 22, February 27, 2012 "A Very, Very, Very Fine Ruling Against 'Emergency' Power Grab"

2011

California Employment Law Letter, Vol. 21, Issue 11, September 12, 2011 "Op-ed: SPOA claims misuse of public funds for city manager's private dispute"

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution