Charlene Morisseau v. Southern Center for Human Rights, Inc.
Sep 19, 2008OUTCOME: Summary judgment for defendant.
Plaintiff alleged that defendant retaliated against her for filing EEOC charge in violation of Title VII and 42 U.S.C. Section 1981.
Atlanta, GA
Wrongful termination Lawyer at Atlanta, GA
Practice Areas: Wrongful Termination, Discrimination ... +2 more
OUTCOME: Summary judgment for defendant.
Plaintiff alleged that defendant retaliated against her for filing EEOC charge in violation of Title VII and 42 U.S.C. Section 1981.
OUTCOME: Summary judgment for defendants.
Plaintiff alleged racial harassment in violation of 42 U.S.C. Section 1981.
OUTCOME: Summary judgment for defendants.
Plaintiff alleged wrongful termination in violation of state law, as well as related claims for violation of federal and state constitutions.
OUTCOME: Dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction.
Plaintiff alleged she was fraudulently induced to accept employment with defendant and then wrongfully terminated.
OUTCOME: Summary judgment for defendants.
Plaintiffs alleged that defendants miscalculated the regular rate of pay for overtime purposes by not including "flex credits" provided under cafeteria plan, in violation of FLSA.
OUTCOME: Summary judgment for defendant.
Plaintiff claimed that defendant terminated his employment because of his alleged disability in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
OUTCOME: Summary judgment for defendants affirmed.
Plaintiff alleged that she, and a class of female traders and sales traders, were discriminated against based on their gender.
OUTCOME: Jury verdict for defendant; affirmed on appeal.
Plaintiff claimed that she was denied re-admission to Columbia University because of her alleged disabilities in violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
OUTCOME:
Putative class action alleging overtime misclassification claims on behalf of current and former assistant store managers.