Philip Jeffrey Terry

Philip Jeffrey Terry

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 35 years

Litigation Lawyer at Santa Rosa, CA
Practice Areas: Litigation, Real Estate, Intellectual Property ... +3 more

100 B St #400, Santa Rosa, CA

About Philip

Biography

Practice Areas

6

Practice Areas

Litigation 30%

36 years | 500 cases

30%
Real Estate 15%

36 years

15%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 35 years

State: California

Acquired: 1990

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Carle Mackie et al LLP

100 B St #400, Santa Rosa, CA, 95401-6376

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Philip Jeffrey Terry's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Philip Jeffrey Terry's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Philip
Justin Dain Hein headshot
Justin Hein

Litigation lawyer | Feb 01

Relationship: Worked for lawyer

"I endorse this lawyer. He is a strategic litigator, highly ethical, and has vast and diverse experience."

Pamela J Ortiz headshot
Pamela Ortiz

Litigation lawyer | Dec 18

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Jeff is detail-oriented, smart, and a fierce litigator."

John K Lassen headshot
John Lassen

Unknown lawyer | Mar 12

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

View All Endorsements
Justin Dain Hein headshot
Justin Hein

Real estate lawyer

Pamela J Ortiz headshot
Pamela Ortiz

Criminal defense lawyer

Lawrence J King headshot
Lawrence King

Employment and labor lawyer

John Bernard Dawson headshot
John Dawson

Intellectual property lawyer

Richard Charles O'Hare headshot
Richard O'Hare

Intellectual property lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2022

Northern California Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2015

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

2007 - Present

Partner, Carle Mackie Power & Ross LLP

2002 - 2006

Senior Litigation Counsel, Carle Mackie Power & Ross LLP

1994 - 2002

Partner, Law Offices of Philip J. Terry and Law Offices of Terry & Terry

1991 - 1994

Associate, Law Offices of Frank F. Sommers

Associations

2023 - Present

Sonoma County Bar Association

Board Member

2017 - Present

Marin County Bar Association

Member

2016 - Present

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Admitted to Practice

2010 - Present

Los Angeles County Bar Association

Member

2007 - Present

Unitied States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Admitted to Practice

2004 - Present

Unitied States District Court for the Central District of California

Admitted to Practice

2003 - Present

Richard M. Sangster American Inn of Court

Member

2002 - Present

Sonoma County Bar Association

Member

1996 - Present

United States Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit

Admitted to Practice

1994 - Present

United States Tax Court

Admitted to Practice

1990 - Present

Bar Association of San Francisco

Member

1990 - Present

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Admitted to Practice

2006 - 2008

Sonoma County Bar Association

Board Member

1991 - 1995

Lawers Club of San Francisco Inn of Court

Past Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Schram v. Shiloh Ridge HOA et al.

Jury verdict and judgment in favor of all defendants and client including an award of costs and attorneys' fees.

Pacific Wine Distributors v. J. F. Hillebrand et al.

Dismissal of plaintiff’s claims and judgment issued in favor of clients in excess of $1.2 M on cross-complaint after five-week-long bench trial in San Francisco County Superior Court. Post trial award of attorneys' fees in excess of $530,000..

Bank of the West v. Sterling et al.

Summary judgment in favor of lender on all lender liability related claims. Judgment after trial by judicial reference (bench trial) against guarantors and in favor of lender in excess of $2 Million.

Cornerstone v. Appinium

Dimissal of all claims of trade secret misappropriation and related claims.

Strome et al. v. DBMK, Inc., et al.

Settlement resulting in dismissal of cancellation and related claims.

Matthews et al. v. Gaspardone et al.

Jury verdict in favor of defendants

Confidential

Settlement and recovery in favor of client

Confidential

Jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs and settlement

Bush v. HUD

Settlement in the amount of $580,000.

Reeds v. Perez et al.

Jury verdicts in favor of all defendants

Turley v. Bryant Family Vinyard

Jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff and award of $255,000

See More Legal Cases

Education

1990

University of California, Hastings College of The Law

JD

1987

University of California, Berkeley

BA with high honors

Speaking Engagements

2021

SCBA Continuing Legal Education Seminar

Real Property Law Update

2020

SCBA Continuing Legal Education Seminar

Real Property Law Update

2019

SCBA Continuing Legal Education Seminar

Real Property Law Update

2018

SCBA Continuing Legal Education Seminar

Real Property Law Update

2017

SCBA Continuing Legal Education Seminar

Real Property Law Update

2016

Firm Attorney CLC Presentation

Arbitration Primer

2013

SCBA Continuing Legal Education Seminar

Effective Presentation of Documents at Trial

2012

SCBA Continuing Legal Education Seminar

Civil Litigation and Trial Update: 2011 Year in Review

2012

SCBA Continuing Legal Education Seminar

Real Property Law Update

2011

SCBA Continuing Legal Education Seminar

Real Property Law Update

Publications

Languages

Spanish

French

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution