Jonathan Langley Lee

Jonathan Langley Lee

also known as Jonathan L. Lee, Jonathan Lee

5.0
Rating: 7.5

Licensed for 46 years

Personal injury Lawyer at San Jose, CA
Practice Areas: Personal Injury

227 N 1st Street, San Jose, CA

About Jonathan

Biography

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Personal Injury 100%

41 years | 1,000 cases

100%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 46 years

State: California

Acquired: 1979

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Jonathan Langley Lee

227 N 1st Street, San Jose, CA, 95113

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Jonathan Langley Lee's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

2 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (2) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 2
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 0
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Compassion

Posted by Kathleen | July 20, 2015 | Lawsuits & Disputes

Excellent Counsel

We had the good fortune to be represented by Mr. Lee in a complex lawsuit involving a rogue neighbor and our road association. From the moment Mr. Lee was assigned to our case, we knew we were in good hands. His professionalism, vast experience and knowledge of the law along with his excellent comm...unication skills were evident from our initial meeting. Given we had always resolved disagreements with our neighbors in a cordial fashion with simple communication and courtesy and had never been sued before, we were blindsided by the initial lawsuit. If mishandled by less-capable representation, we were concerned about hurting innocent neighbors and losing the good will we had acquired over our 22 years in our neighborhood. Mr. Lee, with his excellent knowledge of the law, professionalism and finesse, managed to take an otherwise stressful situation and turn it into manageable nuisance we trusted him to handle to its ultimate successful completion and our great satisfaction. His vast experience, perspective and kindness throughout, helped to reinforce our good standing in the neighborhood while defending us from a divisive neighbor who's intent was to win no matter the cost. Given how pleased we are with his representation, we would not hesitate to use Mr. Lee in any future situations where legal counsel might be necessary nor would we hesitate to recommend his services to anyone who found themselves in a similar legal situation. So impressed were several of our neighbors, who attended the depositions and trial, that they stated they wouldn't hesitate to contact him should they need future legal counsel. One neighbor commented, "we wish he represented us." Pretty much says it all.

See All Client Reviews

Jonathan Langley Lee's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Jonathan
Todd Kamber Davis headshot
Todd Davis

Litigation lawyer | Jul 31

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. I have worked with Jonathan on multiple cases, he is top notch and always goes above and beyond for his clients."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.5 (Very Good)

Work Experience

1981 - Present

Shareholder, Robinson & Wood, Inc.

1979 - 1981

Deputy District Attorney, District Attorney's Office, Tulare County

Associations

1981 - Present

Santa Clara County Bar Association

member

1979 - Present

State Bar of California

member

Sample of Legal Cases

Wood v. Safetrans, Inc.

A seven figure settement was achieved, with a very satisfied client.

Ford v. Gouin 3 Cal 4th 339

Victory

See More Legal Cases

Education

1979

Pepperdine University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1976

Pepperdine University

BS - Bachelor of Science

Speaking Engagements

2011

ADC Annual Meeting

Howell Reverses Direction in the Supreme Court

2010

Medical Damages Seminar

Hanif and Howell

2009

JAMS Presentation

Medical Billing Proof and Collateral Source Issues

2003

Santa Clara County Bar Association Seminar

Closing Arguments

1992

NBI Seminar

Trying the Automobile Injury Case in California

Publications

2015

ADC Defense Comment Howell and Beyond

2012

ADC Defense Comment Will the Coiito Decision Topple the Qualified Work Product Privilege for Certain Witness Statements?

2008

ADC Defense Comment Nishihama Trilogy

2003

ADC Defense Comment Nishihama Reloaded

2002

ADC Defense Comment Reasonable Treatment Means Actual Cost

2000

California Lawyer Magazine Expert Advice Column: Getting More our of your Depositions

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution